Certainty and Subjectivity in English Education Research: A Cross Cultural Systemic Functional Analysis
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
Full PDFReferences
Abu-Rass, R. (2011). Cultural transfer as an obstacle for writing well in English: The case of Arabic speakers writing in English. English Language Teaching, 4(2): 206–212.
Akbas, E. & Hardman, J. (2018). Strengthening or weakening claims in academic knowledge construction: A comparative study of hedges and boosters in postgraduate academic writing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(4): 831–859.
Al-Mudhaffari, M., Hussin, S. & HoAbdullah, I. (2020). Interactional strategies in L2 writing: An exploration of hedging and boosting strategies in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1): 171–186.
Alotaibi, H. (2015). Metadiscourse in Arabic and English Research Article Abstracts. World Journal of English Language, 5(2): 1-8.
Alramadan, M. M. (2020a). Authorial Stance in English, Arabic and EFL Applied Linguistics Research: An Appraisal Study. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 14(1), 189-216.
Alramadan, M. M. (2020b). The Use of Engagement Resources in English, Arabic, and EFL Applied Linguistics Research: A Contrastive Study Within an Appraisal Theoretic Perspective. In E. El-Sadig & T. Drid (eds.), Teaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education, 23-54. IGI Global.
Anderson, G. & Arsenault, N. (1998). Fundamentals of educational research. Taylor and Francis Group.
Butler, C. (1990). Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. In W. Nash (ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse, 137–170. New York: Sage.
Collins, P. (2009). Modals and quasi-modals in English. New York: Rodopi.
Crosthwaite, P. Cheung, L. & Jiang, F. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46: 107–123.
Doğan, Z. N. & Akbaş, E. (2021). An exploratory study of epistemic stance in results and discussion sections of medical research articles. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(3), 252-270.
El-Seidi, M. (2000). Metadiscourse in English and Arabic argumentative writing: A cross-linguistic study of texts written by American and Egyptian university students. In Z. Ibrahim, N. Kassabgy & S. Aydelott (eds.), Diversity in language: Contrastive studies in English and Arabic theoretical and applied linguistics, 111–126. Cairo and New York: The American University in Cairo Press.
Farnia, M., & Gerami, S. (2021). Comparative Study of Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in the Discussion Section of Soft and Hard Science Research Articles: Hedges and Boosters in Focus. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(2), 263-280.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Academic discourse. London: Pearson Education.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Education.
Holmes, J. (1982). Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal, 13(2): 9–28.
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3): 345–365.
Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1): 21–44.
Hu, C. & Li, X. (2015). Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 8(6): 20–31.
Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3): 239–256.
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied linguistics, 17(4): 433–454.
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3): 349–382.
Hyland, K. & Milton. J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in Ll and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2): 183–205.
Koutsantoni, D. (2005). Certainty across cultures: A comparison of the degree of certainty expressed by Greek and English speaking scientific authors. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(2): 121–149.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concept. Chicago Linguistics Society Papers, 8: 183–228.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mirzapour, F. & Mahand, M. (2012). Hedges and boosters in native and non-native library and information and computer science research articles. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2): 119–128.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1): 1–35.
Piqué-Angordans, J., Posteguillo, S. & Andreu-Besó, V. (2002). Epistemic and deontic modality: a linguistic indicator of disciplinary variation in academic English. LSP and Professional Communication, 2(2): 49–65.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Special Purposes, 13(2): 149–170.
Sultan, A. (2011). A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Arabic linguistics research articles. Acta Linguistica, 5(1): 28–41.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1): 95–105.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
Vold, E. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross‐linguistic and cross‐disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1): 61–87.
Wishnoff, J. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19(1): 119–148.
Yang, A., Zheng, S. & Ge, G. (2015). Epistemic modality in English-medium medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 38: 1–10.
Yates, L. (2004). What does good educational research look like? New York: Open University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i1.4548
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 May Mahdi Alramadan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.