Stance in Advanced Academic Writing by Saudi EFL Postgraduates: A Corpus-Based Study of Critique Writing

Abdulwahid Qasem Al Zumor

Abstract


Whether the postgraduate students in the EFL context are adequately trained to express their authorial voice in academic writing in an appropriate tone has not been clarified enough in the literature. The aim of this study is to explore the linguistic resources used by Saudi postgraduate students of Applied Linguistics to construct stance when they write critique essays. To achieve this goal, a corpus of 78000 words was built from 73 critique essays collected in five years. To analyze this corpus, LancsBox corpus analysis software was used to generate the concordances with frequencies of key words in context. The model of corpus analysis used was Hyland’s (2005) which views stance as a construct within a model of interaction in academic discourse that comprises boosters, hedges, attitude markers, and self-mentions. The major findings of the study showed that the most frequently used stance markers were hedges, followed by attitude markers, then boosters, and finally self-mentions. In addition, the linguistic resources used in these strategies of stance construction by the students in this particular context need to be enhanced in order to conform with conventional standards of academic writing. To meet this ambitious requirement, the study recommends explicit instruction, training, and showcasing these textual resources as they occur in high quality discipline-specific publications.


Keywords


EFL writers’ Stance; Hedges; Boosters; Attitude Markers; Self-mentions

Full Text:

Full PDF

References


Al-Mudhaffari, M., Hussin, S., & HoAbdullah, I. (2020). Interactional strategies in L2 writing: An exploration of hedging and boosting strategies in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.1.9

Alharbi, M. (2020). Reimagining the Ever-Changing Construct of Saudi Writerly Identity: A Heuristic Approach. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.17

Alramadan, M. M. (2020). Authorial stance in English, Arabic and EFL applied linguistics research: An appraisal study. Asiatic, 14(1), 189–216.

Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. In Written Communication (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055

Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. (2019). The impact of attitude markers on enhancing evaluation in the review article genre. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-09

Bahrami, L., Dowlatabadi, H., Yazdani, H., & Amerian, M. (2018). Authorial Stance in Academic Writing: Issues and Implications for Research in English Language Teaching. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(2), 69–80.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1994). Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.2.169

Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing Attitudes in Academic Research Articles Written By English and Serbian Authors. Linguistics and Literature, 7(1), 63–73.

Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005

Cheung, L. (2017). Development of Evaluative Stance and Voice in Postgraduate Academic Writing. 1–122.

Christian Fallas Escobar, C., & Chaves Fernández, L. (2018). EFL Learners’ Development of Voice In Academic Writing: Lexical bundles, Boosters/Hedges and Stance-taking Strategies. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 15(15), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.392

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2016). Formulating Writer Stance: A Contrastive Study of EFL Learner Corpora. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_006

Hamdi Kareem Al-Rubaye, M., & Hamdi Kareem, M. (2015). BearWorks BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Metadiscourse in the Academic Writing of EFL and ESL Arabic-Metadiscourse in the Academic Writing of EFL and ESL Arabic-Speaking Iraqi Graduate Students Speaking Iraqi Graduate Students "Metadiscourse in the Academi. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theseshttps://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/17

Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00040-9

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing, 1–227. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl

Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 134–150). Palgrave macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825

HYLAND, K. (2001). Bringing in the Reader. Written Communication, 18(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005

Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and Certainty in L1 and L2 Students’ Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3

Hyland, K., & Nelson, M. E. (n.d.). Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing Cite this paper Related papers Discursive Const ruct ion of Aut horial Voice in English Book Reviews: A Cont rast ive Analysis Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic wr. www.elsevier.com/locate/pragma

Lee, S. (2008). Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 23(3), 43–58.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, 1–278. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Martin, James R, & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: The Appraisal Framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 256.

Mcenery, T., Brezina, V., Gablasova, D., & Banerjee, J. (2019). Corpus Linguistics, Learner Corpora, and SLA: Employing Technology to Analyze Language Use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(2019), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000096

Nivales, M. L. M. (2011). Hedging in College Research Papers: Implications for Language Instruction. Asian EFL Journal, 52(May), 35–46.

Orta, I. V. (2010). A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in business management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica, 19(1), 77–96.

Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and Boosters in Academic Writing A Study of Gender Differences in Essays Written by Swedish Advanced Learners of English. Linguistic C-essay in English at advanced undergraduate level for general purpose course (EN1C03) Title: Hedges and Boosters i.

Uysal, H. H. (2012). Argumentation across l1 and l2 writing: Exploring cultural influences and transfer issues. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 133–159.

Wei, Y., Wherrity, M., & Zhang, Y. (2015). An Analysis of Current Research on the Appraisal Theory. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 3(5), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2015.030506

Yazılarda, A., İşaret, Y., Kullanımı, E. S., & Kafes, H. (2017). International Journal of Language Academy THE USE OF AUTHORIAL SELF-MENTION WORDS IN ACADEMIC WRITING. 5, 165–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3532

Yoon, H. J., & Römer, U. (2020). Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful Student Writing. In Written Communication (Vol. 37, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319898672




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4288

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Abdulwahid Qasem Al Zumor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.