STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON TEACHER-STUDENTS’ INTERACTION IN AN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Ruth Eliana Franssisca, Fransisca Endang Lestariningsih

Abstract


Online learning environment is one of the ways to conduct a learning activity. It usually uses some internet-based programs to support the learning activity including teacher-students’ interaction. Many challenges are considered to occur more on online learning rather than on site learning. Due to its limitation, online learning environment is questioned to be an effective way in providing interaction among teacher and students. Thus, this paper aims to find students’ perspective of teacher-students interaction in an online learning environment. Moreover, to collect the data from the participants, this study used an interview to get in-depth information to see students’ perspective on the related topic. The result shows that two-ways discussion was preferably chosen by the participants and feedback should be given orally, rather than in written form, to help the participants understand more about the materials.

Keywords


Online learning; Students’ perspective; Teacher-students’ interaction;

Full Text:

Full PDF

References


Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.

Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lasseter, A. (2012). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. In Educational Technology. US Department of Education. http://ctl.sri.com/publications/displayPublication.jsp?ID=913

Bušelić, M. (2012). Distance learning – concepts and contributions. Oeconomica Jadertina, 1(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.209

Coldwell-Neilson, J., Craig, A., & Goold, A. (2006). Student Perspectives of Online Learning. ALT-C 2006 Research Proceedings, 1, 97–107.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Elliott, V. F. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5304bf7f-6214-4939-9f1b-b64415d4fac1

Fleming, J., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2018). Methodologies, methods and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 205–213.

Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6

Keller, C., & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of e‐learning in university education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1–2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165020270105

Kielmann, K., Cataldo, F., & Seeley, J. (2012). Introduction to qualitative research methodology: A training manual, produced with the support of the department for international development (DfID). Evidence for Action Research Programme. www.write-arm.com

Ku, B. H., & Lohr, L. L. (2000). A case study of Chinese students ’ attitudes toward their first online learning experience. Internationa Review, 51(3), 95–102.

Lam, P., Lee, J., Chan, M., & Mcnaught, C. (2011). Students ’ use of e-learning strategies and their perceptions of e-learning usefulness (S.-M. Barton, J. Hedberg, & K. Suzuki (eds.)). Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific. http://www.editlib.org/p/37346.

Lara, S. (2006). Preparing teachers and schools for the 21st century. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 12, 44–61.

Lefoe, G., Gunn, C., & Hedberg, J. (2002). Recommendations for teaching in a distributed learning environment: The students’ perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1746

Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. 23(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6

Malinovski, T., Lazarova, M., & Trajkovik, V. (2012). Learner-content interaction in distance learning models: Students’ experience while using learning management systems. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 1(4), 362. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijiie.2012.052737

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Najeeb, S. S. R. (2013). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.183

Rahmawati, F. (2016). E-Learning implementation: Its opportunities and drawbacks perceived by EFL students. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.111

Silverman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research (D. Silverman (ed.); 3rd ed.). SAGE Publication, Ltd.

Singh, G., Donoghue, J. O., & Worton, H. (2002). A study into the effects of e-learning on higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2003.013581

Terzi, S., & Çelik, A. (2005). Teacher-Student Interactions in Distance Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 4(1), 1303–6521.

Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Vilma, Ž. (2018). Implementing Ethical Principles in Social Research: Challenges, Possibilities and Limitations. Vocational Training: Research And Realities, 29(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/vtrr-2018-0003




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3782

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ruth Eliana Franssisca, Fransisca Endang Lestariningsih

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.