Fatemeh Khonamri, Marjan Sangari, Baqer Yaqubi


The present research tries to investigate the impact of teaching Ground Rules (GRs) on EFL learners’ quality of interaction while they are implementing Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). To this purpose, five Iranian EFL intermediate learners who were learning English language in an institute in Iran were selected.  In this study, after three sessions of implementing CSR, 5 GRs were explicitly taught to the learners, and learners’ interaction was analyzed for three subsequent sessions to investigate whether teaching GRs has influenced learners’ quality of interaction during the implementation of CSR. The study was done on the platform of adobe-connect. The researcher recorded learners’ interactions during six sessions for further analysis. Qualitative research design was applied in this study to examine the changes in the quality of learners’ interaction. The result of the study indicated that teaching GRs promoted the quality of learners’ interaction during the implementation of CSR.


Ground Rules; Collaborative Strategic Reading ;Quality of interaction

Full Text:

Full PDF


Aarnoutse, C., & Schellings, G. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation. Educational Studies, 29(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159688

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1

Allwright, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied linguistics, 5(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.2.156

Almasi, J. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guilford Press.


Azizi, M., Pavlikova, M. & Masalimova, A.R. (2020) Exploring Literature Reading Classes in Terms of Types of Feedback Provided by EFL Teachers: Does Teaching Experience Play a determining role? Education and Self Development Journal 15 (3), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.3.02

Bennett, N., & Cass, A. (1989). The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192890150102

Boardman, A. G., Klingner, J. K., Buckley, P., Annamma, S., & Lasser, C. J. (2015). The efficacy of collaborative strategic reading in middle school science and social studies classes. Reading and Writing, 28(9), 1257-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9570-3

Buckley, P., & Boardman, A. (2014). The impact of collaborative strategic reading over time. In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.

Davis, R. L. (1997). Group work is NOT busy work: Maximizing success of group work in the L2 classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02348.x

Dawes, L., Mercer, N. & Wegerif, R. (2000). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds Ltd.

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (2013). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095287

Fan, Y. C. (2009). Implementing collaborative strategic reading (CSR) in an EFL context in Taiwan (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester.

Fan, Y. C. (2010). The effect of comprehension strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p19

Fung, D. (2014). The influence of ground rules on Chinese students’ learning of critical thinking in group work: A cultural perspective. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22(3), 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.899611

Galton, M., & Williamson, J. (1992). Group work in the primary classroom. London: Routledge.

Garton, S. (2002). Learner initiative in the language classroom. ELT journal, 56(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.47

Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 978-1-107-01123-6

Jafri, R. F., & Jufri, J. (2014). Implementing collaborative strategic reading (CSR) in teaching reading news item text to senior high school students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2), 200-208.

Karabuga, F., & Kaya, E. S. (2013). Collaborative strategic reading practice with adult EFL learners: A collaborative and reflective approach to reading. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.071

Khonamri, F., & Kazemian, M. (2016). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Students’ Critical Reading Performance. Malaysian Journal of Education (0126-6020), 41(2).

Kazemian, M., Khonamri, F., Azizi, M., & Molana, K. (2019). Dynamic Assessment in Developing EFL Learners’ Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge through Critical Reading (Pentaksiran Dinamik dalam Membangunkan Kedalaman Kosa Kata Pelajar Bahasa Kedua melalui Pembacaan Kritikal). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 44(2), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2019-44.02-03

Khonamri, F., & Kazemian, M. (2014). The impacts of dynamic assessment and call on critical reading: An interventionist approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 982-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.508

Khonamri, F. (2009). The Role of Beliefs and Metacognitive Awareness in the Strategic Reading Behavior of ESL Learners, Journal of Modern Thoughts.Vol.1 no.1(3)

Khonamri,F., & Mahmoudi, E. (2011). Metacognitive awareness and comprehension monitoring in reading ability of Iranian EFL learners. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development 13 (2), 99-111

Khonamri, F., & Karimabadi, M. (2015). Collaborative strategic reading and critical reading ability of intermediate Iranian learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(7), 1375-1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0507.09

Khonamri, F., Azizi, M.,&Kralik R.(2020).Using Interactive E-based Flipped Learning to Enhance EFL Literature Students’ Critical Reading. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin,10(1), 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.02

Khonamri, F., & Mahmoudi, E. (2011). Metacognitive Awareness and Comprehension Monitoringin Reading Ability of Iranian EFL Learners, Profile Journal: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development. Vol. 13. No. 2-3.

Khonamri, F., & Salimi, M. (2010). The Impact of a Teacher Development Program forStrategic Reading on EFL Teachers' Instructional Practice Profile Journal; Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development. Vol.12 no. 2 (10).

Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1998). Using collaborative strategic reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(6), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999803000607

Huckin, T., & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context: A cognitive model. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes and J. Coady (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning (pp. 153-178). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading. The Reading Teacher, 52(7), 738-747.

Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly 34(1), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588097

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties(2th ed). Guilford Publications.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Boardman, A., & Swanson, E. (2012). Now we get it!: boosting comprehension with collaborative strategic reading. Jossy-Bass. 978-1-118-02609-0

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during

social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The elementary School Journal,

(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/461914

Kramsch, C. J. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005350

Lambirth, A. (2006). Challenging the laws of talk: Ground rules, social reproduction and the curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170600682608

Leki, I. (2001). A narrow thinking system: Nonnative‐English‐speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587859

Littleton, K., Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., Rowe, D., & Sams, C. J. E. y. (2005). Talking and thinking together at Key Stage 1. Early Years, 25(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140500128129

Long, M., (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W., Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Language Acquisition. (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. 9780415404792

Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107

Mercer, N., Fernandez, M., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2003). Talk about texts at the computer: using ICT to develop children's oral and literate abilities. Reading, 37(2), 81- 89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.3702006

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Heck, M. J. (1993). Using small groups for response to and thinking about literature. English Journal, 82(1), 14-22.

Peterson, M. (1997). Skills to enhance problem-based learning. Medical Education Online, 2(1), 42-89. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v2i.4289

Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 99- 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2

Soleymani, M. (2019). A Study of the effect of mindfulness activities on developing critical reading ability of EFL learners and their interactions (unpublished master thesis). University of Mazandaran, Iran.

Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938-964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410305

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.

Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x

Yesid, W., & Alméciga, E. (2016). Discourse analysis applied to English language teaching in colombian contexts: Theory and methods. Universidad del Bosque.

Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. B. T. M. (2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850336.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3745


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Fatemeh Khonamri, Marjan Sangari, Baqer Yaqubi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.