The Effectiveness of Fishbowl Technique towards Students’ Self-Efficacy in Speaking
Abstract
This study is generally attempted to find out whether or not of Fishbowl technique effective towards students’ self efficacy in speaking for second grade students of SMPN 1 Sikur academic year 2017/2018. method of this research was applied is experimental research (quantitative approach). The population of this research was of second grade students at SMPN 1 Sikur. which consistes of eight classes. the samples, were VIII A as experimental class, and VIII C as control class. They were chosen by using cluster random sampling technique with lottery. Experimental class was treated by using fishbowl technique, and control class was treated by using role play. The technique which was used to analysis the data was test formula. From the research data found out that the students’ t-test score (1,73) and t-table (1,667) from (df) was 64. Based on the result of the study, and the correlation between self-efficacy and speaking was r-test (2,70) > r-table (0,320). It can be concluded that the use of fishbowl technique has positive effect toward students’ self-efficacy in speaking and has correlation both of them at the second grade students SMPN 1 Sikur academic year 2017/2018.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anas Sudijono. 2010. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Bandura, A. 1994. Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Bandura. 1997. Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. Toward an unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review.
Brown, Douglas H. 2007. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.
Brown D. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.
Brown D. 2003. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California:Longman.
Brown D. 2002. Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.
Brown D. 2001. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Channey, A. L. 1998. Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Fathurrahman Imran. 2015. Penelitian Experimental. Mataram Institute of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Language and Art Education English Department.
John. Wileyand Sons.2005. Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. Hoboken, New Jersey, simultaneously in Canada.
Miller, Steve. 2005. Experimental Design and Statistics (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge.
Silberman, Malvin L. 2002 active learning 101 strategies to teach any subject,(copyright: simon and Schuster Company) in http://budiman2013.blogspot.co.id.
Suharsimi. 2003. Prosedur Penelitan Suatu TindakanPraktik. Jakarta: PT. RinekaCipta.
Schunk, D. H. 1995. Self- Efficacy for Reading and Writing: Influence of Modeling, Goal Setting and Self Evaluation. Educational Psychologist.
Schunk, D. H. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Tindakan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. RinekaCipta.
Thornbury, Scott. 2002. How to Teach Speaking. New York: Longman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v5i2.345
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Languages and Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.