The Impact of Disregarding Formulaic Competence in Developing Senior High School English Textbooks in Indonesia

Silvester Goridus Sukur

Abstract


This research aims to uncover the impact of disregarding the formulaic competence in designing electronic English textbooks for SMA students in Indonesia. This research belongs to qualitative content analysis one, conducted by using content analysis research method in Indonesia from 2018 to 2019. NVivo 12 Plus was applied to manage and analyze the data that had been stored in this qualitative research software. The data were obtained from three SMA English textbooks for SMA students nationwide as the data sources. The aforesaid textbooks are Bahasa Inggris X by Widiati, U. et al., Bahasa Inggris XI by Bashir, M.; and Bahasa Inggris XII by Widiati, U. et al., all of which were issued by the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture in 2017 and 2018 respectively. One of the techniques applied to achieve the trustworthiness of this study was by using Kappa statistic reliability test in NVivo 12 Plus, the result of which gained the value of reliability agreement level of data > 0.75, which means that it was in excellent category. The research result demonstrated that the three chosen SMA English textbooks lacked the topics for the students to promote their formulaic competence. The impact of this point made the students unable to learn such formulaic-competence-related materials. This case would make them find it hard to improve their communicative competence and reading comprehension skill. Therefore, it is suggested that, for the future revised edition, the writers of the textbooks for SMA students all around Indonesia develop the content of the textbooks comprehensively including the materials for formulaic competence.

 Keywords: textbook, formulaic competence, communicative competence

Keywords


textbook; formulaic competence; communicative competence

Full Text:

PDF Full Paper

References


Allan, R. (2009). Can a graded reader corpus provide “authentic” input? ELT Journal, 63(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn011

Aronoff, M., & Rees-Miller, J. (2008). The Handbook of Linguistics. In The Handbook of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756409

Bazeley, P. (2000). The NVivo qualitative project book. Qualitative Project Book.

Biel, Ł., Biernacka, A., & Jopek-bosiacka, A. (2018). Language and Law. Language and Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90905-9

Brown, K., Cook, G., Cruse, A., Runcie, M., Stein, G., Whitney, N., &

Widdowson, H. (2003). Oxford Collocations Dictionary. !!Dictionary, pp. 1–2.

Celce-Murcia, M. (1995). Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jorda, Eds.). Netherlands: Springer.

Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics (J. Heigham & R. A. Croker, Eds.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. In Journal of Education for Teaching (Vol. 40). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724

Fan, M. (2009). An exploratory study of collocational use by ESL students - A task based approach. System, 37(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.004

Fleiss et al. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

GAO. (1989). Content Analysis : A Methodology for Structuring and Analyzing Written Material. Transfer Paper 10.1.3 Content Analysis, 31. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Girard, M., & Sionis, C. (2004). THE FUNCTIONS OF FORMULAIC SPEECH IN THE L2 CLASS. 53, 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir

Hughes, A., Brown, J. D., Andrews, S., Senior, R., & Burns, A. (n.d.). Materials Development in Language Teaching The Experience of Language Teaching Language Teachers.

Liu, S. (2014). Formulaic Language: An Analytical Review. International Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 1–11.

Myles, F., & Mitchell, R. (1999). & Hooper, J+~ 1999!+ Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction+. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 49–80. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:INTERROGATIVE+CHUNKS+IN+FRENCH+L2+A+Basis+for+Creative+Construction+?#1%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:&+Hooper,+J+~+1999!++Interrogative+chunks+in+French+L2:+

Nesselhauf, N. (2003). . Applied Linguistics, 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223

O’Dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2008). English Collocations in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Quassdorf, S. (2010). Alison Wray: Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Yearbook of Phraseology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222623.3.203

Weinert, R. (1995). The Role of Formulaic Language in Second Language Acquisition: A Review. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.180

Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative analysis using nvivo: The five-level QDA® method. Qualitative Analysis Using NVivo: The Five-Level QDA Method, 1–212. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181660

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative Analysis of Content (B. Wildemuth, Ed.). CT Westport: Libraries Unlimited.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i2.2521

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Silvester Goridus Sukur

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.