Survival Language of Teenagers in Coastal Families in Sandi Village, Wakatobi District

Nadir La Djamudi, Risman Iye, Fithriyah Inda Nur Abida

Abstract


This research aims to describe the curses used by teenagers in the coastal area of Sandi Village, South Kaledupa District, Wakatobi Regency. The study is expected to contribute to the researcher's knowledge in the field of linguistics. The research data consists of utterances containing curses. The informants for this study were 15 individuals, comprising 8 females and 7 males aged between 12 to 18 years. This field research utilized a qualitative descriptive approach with data collection techniques including recording, listening, and note-taking. The study reveals that there are two forms of curses used by teenagers in Sandi Village, namely curses in the form of words and phrases. Curses used by teenagers in coastal families of Sandi Village can be categorized into three types: first, curses in the form of words, consisting of 14 words such as Pei (fool), Deppe (snub-nosed), kumbou (monitor lizard), Tajo (genitals), Kaffiri (infidel), Kajilo (cross-eyed), Dhobba (fat), Onitu (devil), Beka (cat), Jahannamu (damned), setani (devil), pogko (skink), Te saa (snake), and Te ibilisi (demon). Second, curses in the form of phrases, with 10 instances such as Mata kajilou (Your eyes are cross-eyed), Kapatuli pei (naughty fool), Usauri Kabeo-beo (extremely foolish), Kaleau (your genitals), Te ngarou (your mouth), Lengka nuyi ina (your mother's genitals), Teyi ama (your father), Botau (your bald head), Morusu koppe (skinny and bony), Morusu dao (ugly and skinny), Unimmiu (your vagina), sauri konduo (too crazy), teana harramu (illegitimate child), Lombu nu ngaro (mouth hole). It is important to note that some words and phrases might have specific cultural or regional meanings that are crucial to understanding the context of this research.

Keywords


Shapes; Curses; Teenage Wakatobi;

Full Text:

FULL PDF

References


Alwi, H. et.al. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Conceição Savio, E. da. (2016). Studi Sosiolinguistik Bahasa Fataluku di Lautém. In Leiden University. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/37552

Chaer, A. dan Agustina, L. (2014). Sosiolingustik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT Efersco.

I Dewa Putu Wijayana. (2004). “Makian Dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Studi tentang Bentuk dan Referensinya.” Humaniora 4004, XVI (3); 242-251.

Iye, R. (2018). Tuturan Emosi Mahasiswa Kota Baubau dalam Ranah Demonstrasi. Totobuang, 6(1), 125–138.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2008). Fungsi Bahasa dan Sikap Bahasa. Flores: Nusa Indah.

Kridalaksana, Harumurti. (1993). Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kusmana, A., & Afria, R. (2018). Analisis Ungkapan Makian Dalam Bahasa Kerinci: Studi Sosiolinguistik. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 2(02), 173 -. https://doi.org/10.22437/titian.v2i02.6090

Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa Edidi Tiga (Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya). Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, L. (2007). Metodeologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muh. Asrori. (2001). “Variasi Bahasa: Sebuah Kajian atas Pemakain Sosiolek Bahasa Jawa” dalam Jurnal Linguistik Bahasa. Volume 1 Nomor 2, Program Stidi Linguistik (S2) Pasca Sarjana UNS. Surakarta.

Nadhifa Indana Zulfa Rahman. (2019). Penggunaan Kata Tabu di Media Sosial: Kajian Linguistik Forensik The Use of Taboo on Social Media: Forensic Linguistics Analysis Nadhifa Indana Zulfa Rahman. SEMIOTIKA, 20(11), 120–128.

Nurdiyanto, E., & Resticka, G. A. (2021). Kata Makian Sebagai Alat Bukti Investigasi Tindak Kejahatan Verbal (Kajian Linguistik Forensik Berbasis Semantik dan Pragmatik). Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 7(1), 43–56.

Nurlatu, J., Bugis, R. K., Karim, K., Azwan, A., & Iye, R. (2020). Penggunaan Dieksis Sopan Santun Mahasiswa Universitas Iqra Buru. Jurnal Ilmiah FONEMA : Jurnal Edukasi Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.25139/fn.v3i2.3084

Ohoiwutun Paul. (2007). Sosiol ingustik Memahami Bahasa dan Konteks Masyarakat dan Budaya. Jakarta: Kesaint Blan.

Soeparno. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sofie, M. S., Iye, R., Nur Abida, F. I., Bugis, R., Musyawir, M., & Yulismayanti, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of Online Learning on Buru State High School Students on Learning Achievement in Covid-19 Situation. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20230

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Pengantar Peneliti Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Lingustik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto, dkk. (1982). Kata-Kata Afektif dalam Bahasa Jawa. Laporan Proyek Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumarsono. (2014). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2006. Sosioinguistik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajara.

Yadnya, P., & Bagus, I. (2022). The Nouns of Tomia Dialect in Wakatobi Language : An Ecolinguistic. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 7(1), 394–398.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Nadir La Djamudi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.