Click It: The Effect of Integrating Socrative and KWL on Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
FULL PDFReferences
Abdulla, M. H. (2018). The use of an online student response system to support learning of Physiology during lectures to medical students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2931–2946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9752-0
Archila, P. A., Anne, J. M., & Mejía, M. T. de. (2018). Using bilingual written argumentation to promote undergraduates’ bilingual scientific literacy: Socrative® as an immersive participation tool. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 40(13), 1–24.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth.
Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2014). Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2014.3402
Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.-H., &Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6
Balta, N., & Tzafilkou, K. (2019). Using Socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9773-8
Chou, M. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.42
Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Eductaional research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Persey Education.
Cross, T., & Palese, K. (2015). Increasing learning: Classroom assessment techniques in the online classroom. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.1023594
Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S., & Mijatovic, I. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of Moodle: Students’ perception. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.789062
Dieu, T. T. T. (2015). Trying K-W-L strategy on teaching reading comprehension to passive students in Vietnam. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150306.33
Fengjuan, Z. (2010). The integration of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) strategy into English language teaching for non-English majors. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 77–86.
Govender, D. W. (2010). Attitudes of students towards the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) in a face-to-face learning mode of instruction. Africa Education Review, 7(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2010.515394
Greenwood, R. (2019). Pupil involvement in planning topics using KWL grids: Opinions of teachers, student teachers and pupils. Educational Studies, 45(4), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509773
Hamdan, M. H. (2014). KWL-plus effectiveness on improving reading comprehension of tenth graders of Jordanian male students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2278–2288.
Hamid, S. M., Rahman, Q., & Atmowardoyo, H. (2016). The use of Prezi with Know, Want, and Learn (KWL) strategy to enhance students reading comprehension. ELT Worldwide, 3(1), 16–31.
Ingalls, V. (2018). Students vote: A comparative study of student perceptions of three popular web-based student response systems. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9365-0
Jimenez-Silva, M., & Luevanos, R. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogy in action: Views from inside a secondary social studies teacher’s classroom. In C. Coulter & M. Jimenez-Silva (Eds.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 29, pp. 81–105). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720150000029008
Joseph, L. M., Alber-Morgan, S., Cullen, J., & Rouse, C. (2016). The effects of self-questioning on reading comprehension: A literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.891449
Lange, A. A. (2019). Technology, instructional methods, and the systemic messiness of innovation: Improving reading fluency for low socio-economic elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09675-2
Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.668576
Ndlovu, M. C., & Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher perceptions of Moodle and throughput in a blended learning programme for in-service secondary school mathematics teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241667
Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.
Oliver, R., & Vanderford, S. (2012). Evidence of English language proficiency and academic achievement of non-English-speaking background students.pdf. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 541–555.
O’Sullivan, B. (2018). IELTS (International English Language Testing System). In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0359
Sampson, M. B., Linek, W. M., Raine, I. L., & Szabo, S. (2013). The influence of prior knowledge, university coursework, and field experience on primary preservice teachers’ use of reading comprehension strategies in a year-long, field-based teacher education program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(4), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.808296
Shaban, A. E. (2017). The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms: Towards active learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 64–77.
Sinambela, E., Manik, S., & Pangaribuan, R. E. (2015). Improving students’ reading comprehension achievement by using k-w-l strategy. English Linguistics Research, 4(3), 14–29.
St Clair-Thompson, H., Graham, A., & Marsham, S. (2018). Exploring the reading practices of undergraduate students. Education Inquiry, 9(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487
Steele, J., & Dyer, T. (2014). Use of KWLS in the online classroom as it correlates to increased participation. Journal of Instructional Research, 3(1), 8–14.
Stoffelsma, L., & Spooren, W. (2017). Improving the academic reading proficiency of university students in Ghana: An educational design research approach. Language Matters, 48(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2017.1296017
Szabo, S. (2006). KWHHL: A student-driven evolution of the KWL. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 57–67.
Tsai, Y.-R., & Talley, P. C. (2014). The effect of a course management system (CMS)-supported strategy instruction on EFL reading comprehension and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.757754
Usman, B., Fata, I. A., & Pratiwi, R. (2018). Teaching reading through Know-Want-Learned (KWL) strategy: The effects and benefits. Englisia Journal, 6(1), 35–42.
Xu, S. (2012). Strategies for differentiated instruction for English learners. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek (Eds.), Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 349–378). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-0458(2012)0000001015
Yang, Y., & Badger, R. (2015). How IELTS preparation courses support students: IELTS and academic socialisation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 438–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.953463
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zou, Q., & Huang, S. (2018). What learning analytics tells us: Group behavior analysis and individual learning diagnosis based on long-term and large-scale data.Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 245-258. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26388404
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8910
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dewi Nur Suci, Merliyani Putri Anggraini, Ary Ningrum, Inas Nadifah, Qoidatul Marhumah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.