The Effect of Team Product to Improve Students’ Creativity in Writing at SMPN 1 Jonggat

Zukhairatunniswah Prayati

Abstract


This study investigated the effect of team product to improve students’ creativity in writing at the 8th-grade students of SMPN 1 Jonggat, Central Lombok in the academic year 2018/2019. The research was designed as quasi experiment research. The students were divided into the experimental group and control group. The experimental group was treated using the team product method while the control group was subjected to a conventional method. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis. The data in this research was taken from the mean scores of students’ achievement and the score percentages. The subject of this research was the 8th-grade students of SMPN 1 Jonggat, which consisted of 54 students. The instruments of this research were tests and questionnaires. The mean score of students’ creativity in the experimental group was 75 and the writing skill was 76. It was higher than the students in the control group. It can be concluded that the team product had a positive effect on students’ writing skills in relation to creativity at SMPN 1 Jonggat.

Keywords


Team Product; Creativity; Writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, N., & Besancon, M. (2017). Creativity as a stepping stone towards developing other competencies in classrooms. Education Research International https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1357456

Arikunto, S., Suhardjono., & Supardi. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Babayigit, O. (2019). Examining the effect of creative writing activities on reading, writing and language lesson attitudes of elementary school fourth grade students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 213-220 https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.8.1.213

Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence. England: University of Sussex.

Cretu, D. (2017). Fostering 21st century skills for future teachers. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 23, 672-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.05.02.82

Dunn, L. L. S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of North Texas.

Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ reading comprehension in relation to motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011

Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. A. (2019). Practicing Genre-Based Language Teaching Model to Improve Students’ Achievement of Writing Skills. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1), 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.246

Haerazi, H., Irwansyah, D., Juanda, J., & Azis, Y. A. (2018). Incorporating Intercultural Competences in Developing English Materials for Writing Classes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 540-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.13

Hartana, S. (2013). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Deskripsi dengan Metode Field Trip. Skripsi, Universitas Negri Yogyakarta.

Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English Language. New york. Longman Inc.

Hidayat, B. (2008). Pengembangan Kreativitas Menurut Tipologi Berpikir. Yogyakarta.

Huda, M. (2013). Cooperative Learning Metode, Teknik, Struktur dan Model Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Hongkong: The University of Cambridge.

Imran, F., & Sumarni, Bq. (2015). ELT Material Development. unpublished: IKIP Mataram.

Karolina, I. (2006). Teaching Narrative Text in Improving Writing to The Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri Petarukan. Skripsi. Semarang. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Lin, T.-J., Anderson, R. C., Jadallah, M., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., et al. (2015). Social infuences on children’s development of relational thinking during small-group discussions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.004

Ma, S., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T.-J., Zhang, J., Morris, J. A., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., et al. (2017). Instructional infuences on English language learners’ storytelling. Learning and Instruction, 49, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.004

Morris, J. A., Miller, B. W., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Lin, T.-J., Scott, T., et al. (2018). Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. International Journal of Educational Research., 90, 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001

Pelton, R. P. (2010). Action Research for Teacher Candidates. United States of America Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY.

Plucker, J. A., R. A. Beghetto, and Dow. G. T. (2004) “Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research,” Educational Psychologist, 39(2), pp. 83–96.

Purwanto, N. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rafida, T. (2017). The integration of vocabulary and effective sentence mastery towards students’ argumentative writing skills. REGISTER JOURNAL, Language & Language Teaching Journals, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017, pp.1-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v10i1.1-11

Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence.

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), pp.

–117

Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thorne. Kaye, 2007. Essential Creativity in the Clasroom Inspiring Kids . 270 Madison Ave. New york

Torrance, E. Paul. 2016. Comunicating Creativity as Delineated. The Center for Gifted. Geoge.

Yuniarti, E. (2014). Keefektifan Metode Team Product Dalam Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berpidato Persuasive Siswa Kelas x SMKN 1 Karanganyar Kebumen. Thesis, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i1.2213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Zukhairatunniswah Prayati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.