Evaluating Hots and Lots in ‘English for Nusantara’: A Content Analysis af A Grade VII English Textbook

Agvy Rena Fakhrillah, Suharyadi Suharyadi

Abstract


In the 21st century, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills is essential for students. This study analyzes the manifestation of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) in the English textbook ‘English for Nusantara’ for Grade VII. HOTS involves higher-level cognitive processes such as analysis, evaluation, and creation, while LOTS focuses on recall and comprehension. Involving a qualitative research design with a content analysis approach, this study applied Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, which categorize exercises into LOTS (remember, understand, and apply) and HOTS (analyze, evaluate, and create). A total of 116 exercises in the form of instructions and 67 exercises in the form of questions from listening, speaking, reading, and writing tasks were analyzed. To maintain consistency, inter-rater reliability was ensured, where the analysis was cross-verified through discussions with a validator. The findings show that LOTS dominates the exercises, with 81% of the exercises are in the form of instructions and 89% in the form of questions. This indicates a heavy emphasis on LOTS and suggests an opportunity for more HOTS integration. Based on these findings, the study recommends that teachers incorporate more HOTS-focused activities, and textbook authors should design future editions with a stronger emphasis on HOTS exercises to foster critical thinking skills. Such adjustments would better equip students to meet the demands of the 21st century.

Keywords


English textbook; Exercises; HOTS; LOTS; Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Full Text:

Full PDF

References


Al-Qahtani, E. M. (2019). Critical thinking pedagogy: Using Textbooks evaluation and content analysis techniques for Saudi university students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(5), 239–244

Al Raqqad, Y. M., & Ismail, H. H. (2018). Analyzing the reading questions of AP12 textbook according to Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 3(22), 84–94.

Alharbi, S. M., Elfeky, A. I., & Ahmed, E. S. (2022). The effect of e-collaborative learning environment on development of critical thinking and higher order thinking skills. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 6848–6854.

Anderson, L. W. (Ed).), Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.), Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives; abridged edition. (abridged). Longman.

Atiullah, K., Fitriati, S. W., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in reading comprehension questions of English textbook for year X of high school. English Education Journal, 9(4), 428-436.

Barut, M. E. O., & Wijaya, A. (2021). Examining Middle School Student’s Lower Order Thinking Skill: In 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020). Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.052

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fifth edition). Pearson.

Damayanti, I. L., Febrianti, Y., Nurlaelawati, I., Suharto, P. P., Fellani, A. J., & Rahmadhani, R. (2022). English for Nusantara. Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Daniels, E. (2022). Understanding middle school teachers’ levels of efficacy to meet the needs of young adolescents. Middle Grades Review, 8(3). https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol8/iss3/5

Dewantara, K. A. K. (2023). Type analysis of speaking performance assessment task in English for Nusantara textbook. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 11(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i1.64928

Febrina, Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy on higher order thinking skill (HOTS). English Education Journal (EEJ), 10(1), 1–15.

Febriyani, R. A., Yunita, W., & Damayanti, I. (2020). An analysis on higher order thinking skill (HOTS) in compulsory English textbook for the twelfth grade of indonesian senior high schools. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.170-183

Feller, R. (2018). Audio production and critical listening: Technical ear training. Computer Music Journal, 42(1), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/comj_r_00454

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Indrawati, S., Erna, E., Sri Utami, S., Turama, A. R., & Novritika, N. (2022). Pelatihan penyusunan soal-soal tes high order thinking skill (HOTS) pada guru-guru smp sekolah mitra FKIP UNSRI di Palembang. Journal of Sriwijaya Community Service on Education (JSCSE), 1(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.36706/jscse.v1i1.362

Jameel, A. H., Gafur, A., & Sapta, A. (2023). Hots question analysis on e-learning: a 21st century competency evaluation. Edukasi, 17(1), 56–66.

Jamil, M., Bokhari, T. B., & Ahmad, D. (2024). Evaluation of critical thinking elements: A qualitative content analysis of Physics textbook grade IX. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.337110358

Janah, N. F. (2020). Lots and Hots Item Analysis Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy Revision in Exercise of English Textbook Entitled Bahasa Inggris: When English Rings A Bell for SMP/MTS Kelas VII. [Bachelor’s thesis, IAIN Surakarta]. IAIN Surakarta Repository. https://eprints.iain-surakarta.ac.id/90/1/163221024%20Nurul%20Fatkhuril%20Jannah.pdf.

Kamarulzaman, M. S., Sailin, S. N., Mahmor, N. A., & Shaari, A. J. (2017). Correlation between LOTS and HOTS scores among UUM students. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 71–76

Khashabi, D., Chaturvedi, S., Roth, M., Upadhyay, S., & Roth, D. (2018). Looking beyond the surface: a challenge set for reading comprehension over multiple sentences. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1023

Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of Primary Leaving English Exam questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2

Prajapati, R., Sharma, B., & Sharma, D. (2017). Significance of life skills education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 10(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v10i1.9875

Prihatiningsih, F., Petrus, I., & Silvhiany, S. (2021). Cultural representation in EFL textbooks for the seventh graders: A multimodal analysis. Lingua Cultura, 15(1), 121–133 https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i1.7319

Purnama, Y. I., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2019). The impact of higher order thinking skills (hots) instructions in teaching EFL speaking skill from the perspective of students’ motivation. Lingua Cultura, 13(4), 313. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i4.6105

Qasrawi, R., & BeniAbdelrahman, A. (2020). The higher and lower-order thinking skills (hots and lots) in unlock english textbooks (1st and 2nd editions) based on bloom’s taxonomy: An analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3). 744-758. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/866

Raiyn, J., & Tilchin, O. (2016). The impact of adaptive complex assessment on the hot skill development of students. World Journal of Education, 6(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n2p12

Rosmawaty, R., Sumarsih, S., Joharis, M., & Yuhdi, A. (2024). Learning Design of Creative Writing in Higher Education Based on Case and Team Based Project Methods in Creating High Order Thinking Skill. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2023, 24 October 2023, Medan, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-10-2023.2342320

Sari, R. N., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2020). An analysis of the English course book viewed from higher-order thinking skills. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 97–106

Sarnoko, Asrowi, Gunarhadi, & Usodo, B. (2024). Feasibility of a problem-based social constructivism learning model to improve higher-order thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 11(3), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i3.5927

Shalihah, M., Fikri, D., & Mustofa, M. (2022). Analyzing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) questions of reading essay tasks in senior high school English textbook. English Education Journal, 13(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i1.23956

Sinayev, A., Peters, E., Tusler, M., & Fraenkel, L. (2015). Presenting numeric information with percentages and descriptive risk labels: A randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 35(8), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15584922

Singh, C. K. S., & Marappan, P. (2020). A review of research on the importance of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in teaching English language. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(08), 740–747. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.161

Sucipto, S., & Cahyo, S. D. (2019). A content analysis of the reading activities in “Bright 2”an English textbook for junior high school students. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i1.918

Surono, S., Pratolo, B. W., & Hanun, S. L. (2023). Analysis of HOTS and LOTS of instructional questions in the English textbook “When English Rings a Bell” for grade VIII. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i3.8168

Tahir, S. (2015). Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through Yahoo Messenger at University of Iqra Buru. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 174. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150303.20

Tikhonova, E., & Kudinova, N. (2015). Sophisticated thinking: lower order thinking skills. 2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts, Volume 2 (pp. 352–360). https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B12/S3.117

Ulum, Ö. (2016). A Descriptive Content Analysis of the Extent of Bloom’s Taxonomy in the Reading Comprehension Questions of the Course Book Q: Skills for Success 4 Reading and Writing. The Qualitative Report, 21(9). 1674–1683. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2172

Ulum, Ö. (2022). Is the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy revisited in the EFL/ESL reading textbooks?. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(45), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062878

Wijayanto, B., Sumarmi, S., Hari Utomo, D., Handoyo, B., & Aliman, M. (2023). Problem-based learning using e-module: Does it effect on student’s high order thinking and learning interest in studying geography? Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1965

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised understanding the new version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1(1), 1-8.

Xie, S. (2024). An analysis of the cognitive demands of senior high school English as a foreign language textbooks in China. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241280457. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241280457

Yurniwati, Y. & Soleh, D. A. (2020). The effectiveness of computer-based problem solving to improve higher order thinking skills on prospective teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13227a




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.13391

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Agvy Rena Fakhrillah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.