Social Actor Representation in Joe Biden’s Speech about the End of Afghan War (A Critical Discourse Analysis)

Astri Dwi Floranti, Wawan Gunawan, Yasir Mubarok

Abstract


On August 31, 2021, Joe Biden announced officially the drawdown of the United States military forces from Afghanistan war indicating the end of the longest war in American history for 20 years. This study posits that Biden's speech serves as a means of political engagement not only as the announcement of a decision but also as the cultivation of a shared perspective and consciousness on the role and position of the United States and its allies in the Afghanistan war. This study aims at examining the representation of social actors in his speech using van Leeuwen's approach of critical discourse analysis (van Leeuwen, 2008). This study investigates the ways how the social actors are depicted in the speech and uncovers the underlying ideology behind their portrayal. According to the result, the dominance of inclusion strategies (84.1%) indicates various ways of portrayal the social actors either. The recontextualization of the Afghanistan war in the speech is constructed significantly by beliefs and attitudes of social actors within US sides. The speech expresses the role of the current president, US forces and government aiming at the shape of public opinion positively for the future of Americans and the latest national interest of United States Furthermore, this speech emphasizes the American foreign policy during Biden's administration about the multilateralism. Its implementation is proposing the diplomacy, specifically using non-military means to protect the human rights and build strong international collaboration. Biden's decision to end the Afghan war is a deliberate attempt to promote peace and stability in the United States by focusing on its future rather than dwelling on the past.

Keywords


Representation; War on Terror; Ideology; Multilateralism

Full Text:

FULL PDF

References


Adjei, A. A., Ewusi-Mensah, L., & Okoh, H. (2015). Transitivity in political discourse–A study of the major process types in the 2009 state-of-the-nation address in Ghana. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 16, 23–32.

Agbo, I. I., Ngwoke, F. U., & Ijem, B. U. (2019). Transitivity Processes in President Buhari’s’ My Covenant with Nigerians’. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 7–14.

Agung, D. (2019). Perbandingan Politik Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat terhadap ISIS pada Era Pemerintahan Barack Obama dan Donald Trump (2009 - 2019). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Ayalew Nigatu, B., & Tadesse Admassu, M. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of the second inaugural speech of Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2172805

Balog, P. S. (2019). Transitivity analysis of selected privilege speeches of Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) Volume. https://doi.org/10.59960/7.a3

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London.

Chossudovsky, M. (2005). America’s “War on Terrorism” (2 ed.). Global Research.

Chu, R.-X., & Huang, C.-T. (2021). The day after the apology: A critical discourse analysis of President Tsai’s national apology to Taiwan’s indigenous peoples. Discourse Studies, 23(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620942875

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2, hlm. 258–284). Sage.

Featherstone, M., Holohan, S., & Poole, E. (2010). Discourses of the War on Terror: Constructions of the Islamic Other after 7/7. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 6(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1386/mcp.6.2.169_1

Guswita, K. A., & Suhardi, S. (2020). Transitivity analysis of Jokowi and Prabowo campaign speech in Indonesian presidential election. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.234

Hatem, M. F. (2003). Discourses on the" War on Terrorism" in the US and its Views of the Arab, Muslim, and Gendered" Other". The Arab Studies Journal, 11(2/1), 77–97.

Hendarto, Y. M. (2020, Oktober 10). Ideologi Partai di Balik Dua Kutub Pilpres AS. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2020/10/10/ideologi-partai-di-balik-dua-kutub-pilpres-as

Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (2007). Introduction: Discourse, war and terrorism. In A. Hodges & C. Nilep (Ed.), Discourse, War and Terrorism. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hussein, I. (2016). Critical discourse analysis of the political speech of the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal inauguration ceremony. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v4n1a10

Jamil, D. U. (2014). Reading power: Muslims in the war on terror discourse. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.2.2.0029

Kedang, A. Y. (2017). Internasionalisasi dan Internalisasi Wacana War on Terror. Sospol: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 3(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v3i2.4883

Khan, M. H., Adnan, H. M., Kaur, S., Qazalbash, F., & Ismail, I. N. (2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Anti-Muslim Rhetoric in Donald Trump’s Historic 2016 AIPAC Policy Speech. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1828507

Krisnawati, E. (2021, September 10). Sejarah Peristiwa 9/11 WTC: Kronologi Serangan Teroris 11 September. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/sejarah-peristiwa-9-11-wtc-kronologi-serangan-teroris-11-september-gjjX

Liao, G., & Han, G. (2019). Ideological differences between America and China from perspectives of transitivity system—Illustrated by Trump’s and Xi Jinping’s presidential inaugural addresses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.16

Lisbet. (2021). Arah Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat di Bawah Presiden Joe Biden. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 13(3), 7–12.

Matu, P. M. (2008). Transitivity as a tool for ideological analysis. Development Strategies: Struggles for Peace, Justice and Democracy, 25(1), 199–211.

Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313–346.

Pramadya, T. P., & Rahmanhadi, A. D. (2021). A day of history and hope: A critical discourse analysis of Joe Biden’s Inauguration speech. Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies, 10(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v10i2.45383

Renaldo, Z. A. (2021). Presupposition And Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Joe Biden’s Inaugural Speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(3), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p497-503

Schaffner, C. (1996). Editorial: Political Speeches and Discourse Analysis. Current Issues In Language and Society, 3(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529609615471

Sengul, K. (2019). Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: a case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082

Tincheva, N. (2013). Political Speeches, Text Structure, Manipulation. Journal of Education, Psychology and Social.

van Dijk, T. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Ed.), Political Linguistics (hlm. 11–52). Benjamins.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.

van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Dalam R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2 ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Yulianingsih, T. (2021, September 11). 20 Tahun Tragedi WTC 11 September, Al-Qaeda Berpotensi Bangkit? Liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/global/read/4654680/headline-20-tahun-tragedi-wtc-11-september-al-qaeda-berpotensi-bangkit




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11013

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Astri Dwi Floranti, Wawan Gunawan, Yasir Mubarok

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.