Email this article Portrait of Indonesian and Pakistan EFL Students’ Engagement in Online Classroom Based on Neuroscience Approach
Abstract
The integration of neuroscience principles in online teaching can enhance student engagement and create a more engaging and brain-friendly learning experience. This study aims to portray the comparation of Indonesian and Pakistan EFL students’ behaviour, cognitive and emotional engagement in online classroom based on neuroscience approach. The participants in this research were students from Indonesian and Pakistan EFL students. The purposive sampling was used to select the participants who were taking from students of STKIP PGRI Jombang of English language education students from Indonesia and students of Government College Peshawar, Pakistan. This study employed a mixed case study by using a quantitative and qualitative data. The instruments of this study were close- ended and open-ended questionnaires. close-ended questionnaire. The quantitative data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics and the qualitative data was analyzed by thematic analysis. The findings showed that online learning in Indonesia and Pakistan shown to have positive levels of behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement. The most positive engagement from both Indonesia and Pakistan students was behavioral engagement. Then, students’ cognitive engagement was more positive than emotional engagement. Then the finding also showed that the students engagement in Pakistan students was high positive level than Indonesia students.
Keywords
Full Text:
FULL PDFReferences
Adnan, M, & Kainat, A. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2(1):45–51. https://doi.org.10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583.
Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L. E. (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 313–340.
Crampton, A., Ragusa, A.T., & Cavanagh, H. (2012). Cross-discipline investigation of the relationship between academic performance and online resource access by distance education students. Research in Learning Technology, 7(5), 20-31 https://doi,org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14430
Casimiro, L. (2015). Engagement-for-Achievement: Creating a Model for Online Student Engagement. Paper presented at the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2015, Montreal,Quebec, Canada.
Casimiro, L. T. (2016). Cognitive engagement in online intercultural interactions: Beyond analytics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 441-447.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain(2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
D’Errico, F., Paciello, M., Cerniglia, L.(2016). When emotions enhance students’ engagement in e-learning processes. J e-Learn Knowledge Soc, 12(1), 12-24.
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465
Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Sternad Zabukovšek, S. (2019). Factors 197 affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2018-0559
Fudan, J. (2021). Online teaching experience During the COVID-19 in Pakistan. Pedagogy–Technology Balance and Student Engagement. Online Teaching Experience, 7(2), 120-130.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, stateof the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org.10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction,43, 5-15. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
García A., Rodríguez, N. H., González, C., & Bores, G. (2020). Brain activity during different throwing games: eeg exploratory study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 1 (7), 1-18.
Gil-Doménech, D., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2019). Stimulating students’ engagement in mathematics courses in non-STEM academic programmes: A game-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 57–65.
Hospel, V., Galand, B., & Janosz, M. (2016). Multidimensionality of behavioural engagement: Empirical support and implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 37-49.
Jensen, E. (2012). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2021). Analysing students’ cognitive engagement in e-learning discussion forums through content analysis. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.003
Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153–160.
Laksana, A., & Tanduklangi, A. (2019). The significance of teacher-students relationship and students’ academic achievement. Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology, 1(12), 1–12.
Mukhtar, Khadijah, Kainat, Javed, Mahwish, Arooj, and Ahsan, Sethi. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 3(6), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 3(6), 12-24.
Monkaresi, H., Bosch, N., Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.K..(2016). Automated detection of engagement using video-based estimation of facial expressions and heart rate. IEEE Trans. Afect. Comput. 8(1), 15–28 (2016).
Oraif, I., & Elyas, T. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on learning: Investigating EFL learners’ engagement in online courses in Saudi Arabia. Education Sciences, 11(3), 99-119.
Pittaway, S., & Moss, T. (2014). Initially, we were just names on a computer screen: Designing engagement in online teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(7), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL Students’ Perception of Online Learning via Microsoft Teams: University Level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163–173.
Riva, G., Wiederhold, & Mantovani, F. (2021). Surviving COVID-19: The neuroscience of smart working and distance learning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(2), 79-85.
Reyes-Fournier, Edward J. Cumella, Michelle March, Jennifer Pedersen, & Gabrielle Blackman.(2021). Development and validation of the purdue global online teaching effectiveness scale. Online Learning, 24(2) 2, 111–127.
Rukminingsih, A. G. & Latief, M.A. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Erhaka Utama.
Redmond, P. (2014). Reflection as an indicator of cognitive presence. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 46–58.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
Rukminingsih., Mujiyanto, J., Nurkamto, J., & Hartono, R. (2021). The impact of online instruction integrated with brain based teaching to EFL students with different motivation level. Journal of e -Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971- 8829/1135339
Rukminingsih. (2018). Integrating neurodidactics stimulation into blended learning in accommodating students English learning in EFL setting. Paper presented at The Asian Conference on Education (ACE)- IAFOR.
Ruisoto, P. & Juanes, J.A. (2019). Fostering student’s engagement and active learning in neuroscience education. Journal of Medical System, 4(3), 66-78.
Saputra, W. N. E., Wahyudi, A., Supriyanto, A., Muyana, S., Rohmadheny, P. S., Ariyanto, R. D., & Kurniawan, S. J. (2021). Student perceptions of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A study of phenomenology. European Journal of Educational Research, 1515–1528.
Suharti, D. S., Suherdi, D., & Setyarini, S. (2021). Exploring students’ learning engagement in EFL online classroom. Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 139–149. Trowler, V.
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction Journal, 4(3), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
Wang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2018). International student engagement: An exploration of student and faculty perceptions. Journal of International Students, 8(2), 1002–1033.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.10119
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rukminingsih Rukminingsih, Hartia Novianti, Muhammad Anees, Nala Sita Rukmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.