Description of Science Literacy Epistemic Knowledge Ability of Chemistry Education Students on the Material of Colligative Properties of Solutions

Rahmad Ulwan, Eny Enawaty, Rini Muharini, Hairida Hairida, Ira Lestari

Abstract


The ability of science literacy epistemic knowledge is a fundamental thing that must be owned by students in facing the global era to be able to meet the needs of life in various situations. Epistemic knowledge can be said to be a more advanced level of knowledge because epistemic knowledge is closely related to the process of knowledge construction. This study aims to determine the science literacy skills of chemistry education students on the material of colligative properties of solutions. The research method used was a descriptive quantitative method. The study used a sample of 25 samples of 6th semester and 4th semester students using purposive samples. Data collection techniques in this study through measurement techniques and direct communication techniques. The research instrument used in this research is a science literacy test that has been modified and adapted to the material of the colligative properties of the solution. The validation used in this study used construct validity and was validated by judgment experts in material and literacy with valid final results. The results of the research on the ability of epistemic knowledge of science literacy of chemistry education students FKIP Untan shown based on the test of science literacy skills with epistemic knowledge of science literacy on indicators explaining the process of scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 75% with sufficient category. Explaining observations of scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 74% with a sufficient category. Concluding scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 69% with a sufficient category. The overall total average of students' science literacy skills is 73.33% with a sufficient category.


Keywords


chemistry; colligative properties solution; epistemic knowledge; science literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adly Mohamed Ahmad Ibrahim Alnagar. (2007). Using a Constructivist Learning Model for Developing Some Critical Reading and Argumentative Writing Skills Among.

Cerelia, J. J., Sitepu, A. A., N, F. A. L., Pratiwi, I. R., Almadevi, M., Farras, M. N., Azzahra, T. S., & Toharudin, T. (2021). Learning Loss Akibat Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Seminar NASIONAL Statistik, 1–14. http://semnas.statistics.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/erf_uploads/2021/11/Learning-Loss-Akibat-Pembelajaran-Jarak-Jauh-Selama-Pandemi-Covid-19-di-Indonesia.pdf

Dan, I., & Depdendent, F. (2015). Perbedaan kemampuan literasi sains siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent dan field depdendent. 8(2), 27–34.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fauziyah, A., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Biru, L. T. (2021). Analysis of Scientific Literacy Skills in Solving Question Science on Food Security Themes in Serang City. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v6n2.p56-63

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026

Indicators, O. (2016). Education at a Glance 2016 (Summary in Italian). https://doi.org/10.1787/8d06afc6-it

Indicators, O. S. (2019). Society at a Glance 2019 (Summary in English). https://doi.org/10.1787/dbbb7a05-en

Istyadji, M., & Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: a systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.016

Kartimi, K., & Winarso, W. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Science Literacy Skills; Implications for Scientific Approach in Elementary School. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 8(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v8i2.9175

Mellyzar, M., Alvina, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121

Putri, T. R., Masriani, Rasmawan, R., Hairida, & Erlina. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia di Universitas Tanjungpura Pendahuluan. 6(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i2.25460

Subaidah, T., Muharrami, L. K., Rosidi, I., & Ahied, M. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Konteks dan Knowledge Menggunakan Cooperative Proplem Solving ( CPS ) dengan Strategi Heuristik. 2(2), 113–122.

Sumanik, N. B., Nurvitasari, E., & Siregar, L. F. (2021). Analysis of Science Literation Abilities Profile Prospective Teachers of Chemical Education. 12(1), 22–32.

Sutrisna, N., & Anhar, A. (2019). Analysis_of_Scientific_Literacy_Capabili. 314–317.

Utami, A. U. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) Berbasis Daring pada Pembelajaran IPA untuk Mengukur Literasi Sains. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v11i2.157

Wardhana, S. O., & Hidayah, R. (2021). Profil Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Ditinjau Dari Domain Pengetahuan The Science Literacy Profile of Senior High School Students in Terms of Knowledge Domains. 313–321.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i6.14230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.