Email this article 
Literature Review on the Use of Interactive Labs Technology in The Context of Science Education
Abstract
Science education is a cornerstone in preparing students for the complexities of the contemporary world. In this vein, the integration of Interactive Labs technology resources into science learning presents a promising avenue. This literature review delves into the expansive realm of Interactive Labs within science education, shedding light on their myriad advantages and burgeoning trends. Employing the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)" methodology, the review meticulously scrutinizes pertinent articles, elucidating the transformative potential inherent in Interactive Labs, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) technologies in the realm of science education. One of the primary revelations of this review is the manifold benefits that Interactive Labs offer. These technologies not only enhance students' attitudes towards science but also bolster their academic performance, foster critical thinking skills, and augment engagement levels. Furthermore, Interactive Labs present a cost-effective, scalable, and safe alternative to traditional laboratory settings, thereby democratizing access to hands-on scientific experimentation. Particularly noteworthy are the transformative capabilities of VR and AR technologies within the educational landscape. By immersing students in simulated environments, VR and AR facilitate experiential learning, allowing students to interact with scientific concepts in ways previously unimaginable. This immersive approach not only enhances comprehension but also kindles a sense of wonder and curiosity, vital for nurturing a lifelong passion for science. In conclusion, this literature review underscores the pivotal role that technology plays in shaping the future of science education. By equipping educators and institutions with innovative tools, such as Interactive Labs, VR, and AR, it paves the way for enriched learning experiences and contributes to the continual evolution of science education. The integration of technology promises to be instrumental in realizing the full potential of science education, thereby fostering a generation of adept and inspired scientific minds.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abouhashem, A., Abdou, R. M., Bhadra, J., Santhosh, M., Ahmad, Z., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2021). A Distinctive Method of Online Interactive Learning in STEM Education. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413909
Ahmed, M. E., & Hasegawa, S. (2021). Development of Online Virtual Laboratory Platform for Supporting Real Laboratory Experiments in Multi Domains. Education Sciences, 11(9), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090548
Ali, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Review to Analyze and Compare Virtual Chemistry Laboratories for Their Use in Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3563–3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00185
Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022a). Interactive Laboratories for Science Education: A Subjective Study and Systematic Literature Review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(10), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100085
Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022b). Minimization of students’ cognitive load in a virtual chemistry laboratory via contents optimization and arrow-textual aids. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7629–7652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10936-6
Arista, F. S., Kuswanto, H., & Physics Education, Postgraduate Program, University Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [email protected]. (2018). Virtual Physics Laboratory Application Based on the Android Smartphone to Improve Learning Independence and Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a
Bonser, S. P., De Permentier, P., Green, J., Velan, G. M., Adam, P., & Kumar, R. K. (2013). Engaging students by emphasising botanical concepts over techniques: Innovative practical exercises using virtual microscopy. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.764344
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Daineko, Y., Dmitriyev, V., & Ipalakova, M. (2017). Using virtual laboratories in teaching natural sciences: An example of physics courses in university. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21777
De Jong, T., Gillet, D., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Hovardas, T., Dikke, D., Doran, R., Dziabenko, O., Koslowsky, J., Korventausta, M., Law, E., Pedaste, M., Tasiopoulou, E., Vidal, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: The case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09904-z
El Kharki, K., Berrada, K., & Burgos, D. (2021). Design and Implementation of a Virtual Laboratory for Physics Subjects in Moroccan Universities. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073711
Elmoazen, R., Saqr, M., Khalil, M., & Wasson, B. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y
Faulconer, E. K., & Gruss, A. B. (2018). A Review to Weigh the Pros and Cons of Online, Remote, and Distance Science Laboratory Experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386
Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A.-N., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G.-M. (2020). Evaluation of an Interactive Personalised Virtual Lab in Secondary Schools. In H. C. Lane, S. Zvacek, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Computer Supported Education (Vol. 1220, pp. 538–556). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_26
Ghoniem, R. M., Abas, H. A., & Bdair, H. A. (2018). A novel intelligent object-oriented three-dimensional simulation system for physics experimentation. Applied Computing and Informatics, 16(1/2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.10.003
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Herayanti, L. (2017). Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Skills on Electricity Concept. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9481
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E., Brauneis, A., Diaz, M., Saltarelli, A., Blikstein, P., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2018). Design Guidelines and Empirical Case Study for Scaling Authentic Inquiry-based Science Learning via Open Online Courses and Interactive Biology Cloud Labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 478–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0150-3
Ibrahem, U. M., Alsaif, B. S., Alblaihed, M., Ahmed, S. S. I., Alshrif, H. A., Abdulkader, R. A., & Diab, H. M. (2022). Interaction between cognitive styles and genders when using virtual laboratories and its influence on students of health college’s laboratory skills and cognitive load during the Corona pandemic. Heliyon, 8(4), e09213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09213
Jagodziński, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of Application Technology of Natural User Interfaces in the Creation of a Virtual Chemical Laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5
Lee, S. A., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2022). Micro-HBI: Human-Biology Interaction With Living Cells, Viruses, and Molecules. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 849887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.849887
Lestari, D. P., Supahar, Paidi, Suwarjo, & Herianto. (2023). Effect of science virtual laboratory combination with demonstration methods on lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability in a science course. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11857-8
Miyamoto, M., Milkowski, D. M., Young, C. D., & Lebowicz, L. A. (2019). Developing a Virtual Lab to Teach Essential Biology Laboratory Techniques. Journal of Biocommunication, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/jbc.v43i1.9959
Ng, M. E., & Chua, K. H. (2023). The Effect of Using PhET in Changing Malaysian Students’ Attitude to Learning Physics in a Full Virtual Environment. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 31(2), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.2.05
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Paxinou, E., Panagiotakopoulos, C. T., Karatrantou, A., Kalles, D., & Sgourou, A. (2020). Implementation and Evaluation of a Three‐Dimensional Virtual Reality Biology Lab versus Conventional Didactic Practices in Lab Experimenting with the Photonic Microscope. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21307
Petersen, G. B., Stenberdt, V., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2023). Collaborative generative learning activities in immersive virtual reality increase learning. Computers & Education, 207, 104931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104931
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Prayogi, S., Ahzan, S., Indriaturrahmi, I., & Rokhmat, J. (2022). Opportunities to Stimulate the Critical Thinking Performance of Preservice Science Teachers Through the Ethno-Inquiry Model in an E Learning Platform. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), Article 9. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/5818
Price, C. B., & Price-Mohr, R. (2019). PhysLab: A 3D virtual physics laboratory of simulated experiments for advanced physics learning. Physics Education, 54(3), 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab0005
Reilly, J. M., & Dede, C. (2019). Differences in Student Trajectories via Filtered Time Series Analysis in an Immersive Virtual World. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303832
Sanzana, M. R., Abdulrazic, M. O. M., Wong, J. Y., Karunagharan, J. K., & Chia, J. (2023). Gamified virtual labs: Shifting from physical environments for low-risk interactive learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0281
Sarkingobir, Y., Egbebi, L. F., & Awofala, A. O. A. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of the Thinking Styles in Math and Its’ Implication on Science Learning. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 2(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v2i1.1391
Sasmito, A. P., & Sekarsari, P. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Understanding and Motivation During Covid-19 Pandemic by Development of Virtual Laboratory: Research Article. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.117
Stahre Wästberg, B., Eriksson, T., Karlsson, G., Sunnerstam, M., Axelsson, M., & Billger, M. (2019). Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09857-0
Su, C.-H., & Cheng, T.-W. (2019). A Sustainability Innovation Experiential Learning Model for Virtual Reality Chemistry Laboratory: An Empirical Study with PLS-SEM and IPMA. Sustainability, 11(4), 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041027
Suhirman, & Prayogi, S. (2023). Problem-based learning utilizing assistive virtual simulation in mobile application to improve students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i3.3380
Toth, E. E., Ludvico, L. R., & Morrow, B. L. (2014). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: The role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ernita, N., & Prayogi, S. (2022). Enhancing the Reasoning Performance of STEM Students in Modern Physics Courses Using Virtual Simulation in the LMS Platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.31459
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Rijal, K., & Grendis, N. W. B. (2023). Examining STEM Students’ Computational Thinking Skills through Interactive Practicum Utilizing Technology. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 2(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v2i1.1360
Winkelmann, K., Scott, M., & Wong, D. (2014). A Study of High School Students’ Performance of a Chemistry Experiment within the Virtual World of Second Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1432–1438. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500009e
Wirzal, M. D. H., Nordin, N. A. H. M., Bustam, M. A., & Joselevich, M. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scientific Literacy between 2018 and 2022: Science Education Subject. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1070
Wu, B., Wong, S., & Li, T. (2019). Virtual titration laboratory experiment with differentiated instruction. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 30(3–4), e1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1882
Xie, H., Wang, L., Pang, Z., Chen, S., Xu, G., & Wang, S. (2022). Application of problem-based learning combined with a virtual simulation training platform in clinical biochemistry teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 985128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.985128
Yakob, M., Sari, R. P., Hasibuan, M. P., Nahadi, N., Anwar, S., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2023). The feasibility authentic assessment instrument through virtual laboratory learning and its effect on increasing students’ scientific performance. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.631
Zourmpakis, A. I., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Education of preschool and elementary teachers on the use of adaptive gamification in science education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2022.120556
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.12154
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education is licensed under CC BY 4.0
ISSN: 3046-6946 (online)