The Integration of Ethnoscience and Technology: A Review

Norazmie Yusof, Lalu Nurul Yaqin, Pg Mohd Rahiman Pg Aliudin, Saidatul Nornis Mahali

Abstract


This literature review critically examines the integration of ethnoscience and technology, highlighting the transformative impact of this amalgamation on the field of social sciences. Ethnoscience, with its focus on understanding the diverse ways in which human communities perceive and interact with their world, and ethnography, a methodology for the immersive study of cultures and social interactions, together provide a robust framework for exploring human cognition, behavior, and societal constructs. The review delves into the key principles of ethnoscience, emphasizing the development and significance of ethnography in anthropological research and the methodological flexibility required to address contemporary challenges. This study further explores the integration of technological innovations such as wearables, digital traces, and information and communication technology (ICT) into ethnographic studies, underscoring the opportunities and challenges presented by the digital era. The paper argues that the incorporation of technology not only expands the methodological toolkit available to researchers but also enhances the depth and breadth of ethnographic insights into socio-economic, policy, and environmental factors influencing technology adoption across various sectors. Despite the methodological, socio-economic, and infrastructural hurdles, the integration offers unprecedented opportunities for understanding complex social phenomena, contributing significantly to policy-making, community development, and technological innovation. This review underscores the necessity of evolving ethnographic practices to keep pace with technological advancements, fostering a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the intricacies of human life in the digital age.


Keywords


Ethnoscience; Technology integration; Ethnographic; Technological innovations; ICT in research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aida, J., Kuriyama, S., Ohmori-Matsuda, K., Hozawa, A., Osaka, K., & Tsuji, I. (2010). The association between neighborhood social capital and self-reported dentate status in elderly japanese - the ohsaki cohort 2006 study. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 39(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00590.x

Akemu, O., & Abdelnour, S. (2018). Confronting the digital: doing ethnography in modern organizational settings. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 296-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118791018

Alinejad, D. (2018). Digital ethnography: principles and practice. New Media & Society, 20(1), 428-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733962c

Alinejad, D., Candidatu, L., Mevsimler, M., Minchilli, C., Ponzanesi, S., & Vlist, F. (2018). Diaspora and mapping methodologies: tracing transnational digital connections with ‘mattering maps’. Global Networks, 19(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12197

Andreasson, R., Jansson, A., & Lindblom, J. (2018). The coordination between train traffic controllers and train drivers: a distributed cognition perspective on railway. Cognition Technology & Work, 21(3), 417-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0513-z

Ashraf, M., Grunfeld, H., Hoque, M., & Alam, K. (2017). An extended conceptual framework to understand information and communication technology-enabled socio-economic development at community level in bangladesh. Information Technology and People, 30(4), 736-752. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-03-2016-0067

Azarova, M., Hazoglou, M., & Aronoff-Spencer, E. (2020). Just slack it: a study of multidisciplinary teamwork based on ethnography and data from online collaborative software. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1435-1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820975723

Baker, S., Warburton, J., Hodgkin, S., & Pascal, J. (2016). The supportive network: rural disadvantaged older people and ict. Ageing and Society, 37(6), 1291-1309. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x16000350

Bariya, M., Nyein, H., & Javey, A. (2018). Wearable sweat sensors. Nature Electronics, 1(3), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y

Barvinski, C., Ferreira, G., Machado, L., Longhi, M., Behar, P., & Ribeiro, A. (2019). Affective and social aspects in distance education: the interdisciplinarity in focus. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(6), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss6.1525

Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. (2014). Design ethnography in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12055

Bath, C. (2009). When does the action start and finish? making the case for an ethnographic action research in educational research. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790902914183

Beller, J., & Wagner, A. (2017). Disentangling loneliness: differential effects of subjective loneliness, network quality, network size, and living alone on physical, mental, and cognitive health. Journal of Aging and Health, 30(4), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316685843

Beneito-Montagut, R., Begueria, A., & Cassián, N. (2017). Doing digital team ethnography: being there together and digital social data. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 664-682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117724500

Berg, U., León, S., & Tosh, S. (2022). Carceral ethnography in a time of pandemic: examining migrant detention and deportation during Covid-19. Ethnography, 146613812110724. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381211072414

Bressers, G., Brydges, M., & Paradis, E. (2020). Ethnography in health professions education: slowing down and thinking deeply. Medical Education, 54(3), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14033

Burns, R., & Wark, G. (2019). Where’s the database in digital ethnography? exploring database ethnography for open data research. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119885040

Bvuma, S., & Marnewick, C. (2020). Sustainable livelihoods of township small, medium and micro enterprises towards growth and development. Sustainability, 12(8), 3149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083149

Califf, C., & Stumpf, T. (2018). Sharpening the ethnographer’s toolkit: introducing the freelist method to information systems research. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.666

Clowater, V. (2022). Pokémon go as palimpsest. Loading, 14(24), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.7202/1084841ar

Costa, M., Luna, I., Pinheiro, P., Rodrigues, R., Vieira, N., & Gubert, F. (2016). Social determinants of health: risks and vulnerability in adolescence. International Archives of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3823/2037

Crabtree, A., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Tennent, P., Chalmers, M., & Brown, B. (2006). Supporting ethnographic studies of ubiquitous computing in the wild. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142417

Creese, J., Byrne, J., Olson, R., & Humphries, N. (2022). A catalyst for change: developing a collaborative reflexive ethnographic approach to research with hospital doctors during the covid-19 pandemic. Methodological Innovations, 16(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221137813

Dong, B., Yang, Y., Shi, Q., Xu, S., Sun, Z., Zhu, S., … & Lee, C. (2020). Wearable triboelectric–human-machine interface (thmi) using robust nanophotonic readout. Acs Nano, 14(7), 8915-8930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03728

Dwivedi, Y., & Lal, B. (2007). Socio‐economic determinants of broadband adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5), 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710750417

Fatková, G., & Šlehoferová, T. (2021). Structured methods of data production and their visualization using gis: semantic domains in ethnographic research of landscapes. Łódzkie Studia Etnograficzne, 60, 53-75. https://doi.org/10.12775/lse.2021.60.04

Fehrer, J., Woratschek, H., & Brodie, R. (2018). A systemic logic for platform business models. Journal of Service Management, 29(4), 546-568. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-02-2017-0036

Ferguson, R. (2017). Offline ‘stranger’ and online lurker: methods for an ethnography of illicit transactions on the darknet. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 683-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117718894

Ferreira, S., Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2016). Older people’s production and appropriation of digital videos: an ethnographic study. Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(6), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1265150

Fonseca, L., Aredes, N., Leite, A., Santos, C., Lima, R., & Scochi, C. (2013). Evaluation of an educational technology regarding clinical evaluation of preterm newborns. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 21(1), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692013000100011

Fujiwara, Y., Kondo, K., Koyano, W., Murayama, H., Shinkai, S., Fujita, K., … & Horiuchi, F. (2022). Social frailty as social aspects of frailty: research, practical activities, and prospects. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 22(12), 991-996. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14492

Gertner, A., Franklin, J., Roth, I., Cruden, G., Haley, A., Finley, E., … & Powell, B. (2021). A scoping review of the use of ethnographic approaches in implementation research and recommendations for reporting. Implementation Research and Practice, 2, 263348952199274. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489521992743

Githinji, R. (2022). Application of information and communication technologies for development (ict4d) to rural communities in kenya. Science Mundi, 2(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.2.1.1.1

Greenhalgh, T., & Swinglehurst, D. (2011). Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography. BMC Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-45

Greenhalgh, T., Procter, R., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., & Rouncefield, M. (2015). What is quality in assisted living technology? the archie framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Medicine, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6

Haight, W., Kayama, M., & Korang-Okrah, R. (2013). Ethnography in social work practice and policy. Qualitative Social Work, 13(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013507303

Hallett, R., & Barber, K. (2013). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613497749

Horbel, C., Buck, C., Diel, S., Reith, R., & Walter, Y. (2020). Stadium visitors' smartphone usage and digital resource integration. Sport Business and Management an International Journal, 11(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-10-2019-0099

Hsieh, J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2011). Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: forms of capital that affect ict utilization. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0256

Jewitt, C., & Mackley, K. (2018). Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory ethnography: digital touch communication. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 90-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118796992

Jm, O., Tt, D., & Este, D. (2012). Using critical ethnography to explore issues among immigrant and refugee women seeking help for postpartum depression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(11), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2012.701707

Jones, P., Simmons, G., Packham, G., Beynon-Davies, P., & Pickernell, D. (2012). An exploration of the attitudes and strategic responses of sole-proprietor micro-enterprises in adopting information and communication technology. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612461802

Kabir, K., Roy, D., & Kashem, M. (2016). Social computing behavior of the students of bangladesh agricultural university, mymensingh. Social Sciences, 5(6), 86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160506.12

Kang, H., & Exworthy, M. (2022). Wearing the future—wearables to empower users to take greater responsibility for their health and care: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 10(7), e35684. https://doi.org/10.2196/35684

Kałużna-Czaplińska, J., Żurawicz, E., & Jóźwik-Pruska, J. (2017). Focus on the social aspect of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(5), 1861-1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3407-7

Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., Sörhammar, D., & Sklyar, A. (2022). Digital servitization: how data-driven services drive transformation. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.155

Krah, E., & Kruijf, J. (2013). An ethnographic assessment of electronic cash transfers in ghana's remote rural north. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517899.2517910

Kratz, C. (2010). In and out of focus. American Ethnologist, 37(4), 805-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01286.x

Kuhlen, A., & Rahman, R. (2023). Beyond speaking: neurocognitive perspectives on language production in social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 378(1875). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0483

Kumar, S., & Daniel, B. (2016). Integration of learning technologies into teaching within fijian polytechnic institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0036-8

Leksono, E., & Vanany, I. (2019). Integration of a balanced scorecard, dematel, and anp for measuring the performance of a sustainable healthcare supply chain. Sustainability, 11(13), 3626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133626

Li, N. (2020). Understanding ethnographic research and cross-cultural differences. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v3-i08-01

Liu, L., Qu, J., Maraseni, T., Niu, Y., Zeng, J., Zhang, L., … & Xu, L. (2020). Household co2 emissions: current status and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197077

Lokot, T. (2018). Be safe or be seen? how russian activists negotiate visibility and security in online resistance practices. Surveillance & Society, 16(3), 332-346. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i3.6967

Magnussen, I., Alteren, J., & Bondas, T. (2021). “Human flourishing with dignity”: a meta-ethnography of the meaning of gardens for elderly in nursing homes and residential care settings. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8, 233339362110357. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211035743

Mamonov, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2020). Unlocking the smart home: exploring key factors affecting the smart lock adoption intention. Information Technology and People, 34(2), 835-861. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-07-2019-0357

Mbuyisa, B., & Leonard, A. (2016). The role of ict use in smes towards poverty reduction: a systematic literature review. Journal of International Development, 29(2), 159-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3258

McDougall, C., Welsh, A., Gosselin, T., Anderson, W., & Nelson, P. (2017). Rethinking the influence of hydroelectric development on gene flow in a long-lived fish, the lake sturgeon acipenser fulvescens. Plos One, 12(3), e0174269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174269

Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Yildiz, B., Çiğdem, Ş., & Činčikaitė, R. (2021). Do people prefer cars that people don’t drive? a survey study on autonomous vehicles. Energies, 14(16), 4795. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164795

Meinert, E., Alturkistani, A., Brindley, D., Knight, P., Wells, G., & Pennington, N. (2018). Weighing benefits and risks in aspects of security, privacy and adoption of technology in a value-based healthcare system. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0700-0

Mensah, J., Adu, G., Amoah, A., Abrokwa, K., & Adu, J. (2016). What drives structural transformation in sub‐saharan africa?. African Development Review, 28(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12187

Meso, P., Musa, P., & Mbarika, V. (2005). Towards a model of consumer use of mobile information and communication technology in ldcs: the case of sub‐saharan africa. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00190.x

Messias, L., Reis, I., Bielik, V., Garbuio, A., Gobatto, C., & Manchado-Gobatto, F. (2021). Association between mechanical, physiological, and technical parameters with canoe slalom performance: a systematic review. Frontiers in Physiology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.734806

Mirski, A. (2015). Social and cognitive aspects of children’s play. European Humanities Studies State and Society, 3, 72-83. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2015.3.07

Molloy, L., Walker, K., & Lakeman, R. (2017). Shared worlds: multi-sited ethnography and nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 24(4), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2017.e1506

Monahan, T., & Fisher, J. (2010). Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research, 10(3), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110362874

Mulac, A., Mathiesen, L., Taxis, K., & Granås, A. (2021). Barcode medication administration technology use in hospital practice: a mixed-methods observational study of policy deviations. BMJ Quality & Safety, 30(12), 1021-1030. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013223

Murphy, P., Kornetskyy, A., & Nixon, J. (2021). Delineating novel aspects of social enterprise theory. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(2), 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-04-2021-0036

Myers, M. (1999). Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00223

Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2019). Democratizing health insurance services; accelerating social inclusion through technology policy of health insurance firms. Business Strategy & Development, 2(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.59

Nolan, J., & Pieroni, A. (2013). Recollections, reflections, and revelations: ethnobiologists and their “first time” in the field. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-12

Ochs, E., & Solomon, O. (2010). Autistic sociality. Ethos, 38(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01082.x

Oh, K. (2020). Social aspects of personal information organization. Journal of Documentation, 77(2), 558-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0104

Park, H., & Choi, S. (2019). Digital innovation adoption and its economic impact focused on path analysis at national level. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 5(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030056

Pink, S., & Fors, V. (2017). Ethnography, stakeholders, and audiences: toward openness and inclusivity. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417746029

Prox, L., & Farine, D. (2019). A framework for conceptualizing dimensions of social organization in mammals. Ecology and Evolution, 10(2), 791-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5936

Prytuliak, R., Pfeiffer, F., & Habermann, B. (2018). Slalom, a flexible method for the identification and statistical analysis of overlapping continuous sequence elements in sequence- and time-series data. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2020-x

Putra, H. (2021). Ethnoscience a bridge to back to nature. E3s Web of Conferences, 249, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124901002

Rafi, M., Zheng, J., & Ahmad, K. (2020). Digital resources integration under the knowledge management model: an analysis based on the structural equation model. Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(4), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-12-2019-0087

Rajan, R., Dhir, S., & Sushil, S. (2020). Technology management for innovation in organizations: an argumentation-based modified tism approach. Benchmarking an International Journal, 28(6), 1959-1986. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2020-0019

Reyes-Cruz, G., Fischer, J., & Reeves, S. (2022). Demonstrating interaction: the case of assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(5), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514236

Rodrigues, E., Seixas, C., Sauini, T., & Adams, C. (2022). The importance of ethnoecological studies for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity: a critical analysis of six decades of support by fapesp. Biota Neotropica, 22(spe). https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2022-1403

Sanches, P., & Brown, B. (2018). Data bites man. Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274422

Sattarov, F., & Nagel, S. (2019). Building trust in persuasive gerontechnology: user-centric and institution-centric approaches. Gerontechnology, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2019.18.1.001.0

Schoepfle, M., Burton, M., & Begishe, K. (1984). Navajo attitudes toward development and change: a unified ethnographic and survey approach to an understanding of their future. American Anthropologist, 86(4), 885-904. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.4.02a00040

Simanjuntak, E., Suryanto, S., & Hendriani, W. (2022). Using ethnography in psychological research: challenges and opportunities. Buletin Psikologi, 30(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.56215

Smith, R., & Turpin, M. (2017). Design science research and activity theory in ict4d: developing a socially relevant ict platform for elderly women in remote rural South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_29

Tallyn, E., Fried, H., Gianni, R., Isard, A., & Speed, C. (2018). The ethnobot. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174178

Taylor, B., Barley, W., Brummans, B., Ellingson, L., Ganesh, S., Herrmann, A., … & Tracy, S. (2021). Revisiting ethnography in organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(4), 623-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211026700

Tileagă, C., Popoviciu, S., & Aldridge, J. (2021). Short-term ethnography and women’s voices: insights from fieldwork with roma communities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(5), 1246-1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2021.1941819

Tognoli, E., Zhang, M., Fuchs, A., Beetle, C., & Kelso, J. (2020). Coordination dynamics: a foundation for understanding social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317

Tripathi, V., Popli, M., Ghulyani, S., Desai, S., & Gaur, A. (2020). Knowledge creation practices at organizational boundaries: the role of ict in sickle-cell care for tribal communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(3), 595-617. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2019-0521

Underberg-Goode, N. (2016). Digital ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_49-1

Vesa, M., & Vaara, E. (2014). Strategic ethnography 2.0: four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745

Viswam, D., Sujatha, R., & Mohan, J. (2022). Unsung voices of technology in school education-findings using the constructivist grounded theory approach. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00182-7

Vollmer, H. (2023). Accounting theory, ethnography, and the silence of the social. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-09-2022-0145

Walters, J., Kaminsky, J., & Gottschamer, L. (2018). A systems analysis of factors influencing household solar pv adoption in Santiago, Chile. Sustainability, 10(4), 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041257

Wang, D., & Liu, S. (2021). Doing ethnography on social media: a methodological reflection on the study of online groups in china. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(8-9), 977-987. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211014610

Wentzel, K. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62(5), 1066. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131152

Williams, A., Martinez-Santos, A., McAdam, J., & Nester, C. (2016). ‘trial and error…’, ‘…happy patients' and ‘…an old toy in the cupboard’: a qualitative investigation of factors that influence practitioners in their prescription of foot orthoses. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0142-9

Winter, R., & Lavis, A. (2019). Looking, but not listening? theorizing the practice and ethics of online ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1-2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619857529

Zewge, A., & Dittrich, Y. (2017). Systematic mapping study of information technology for development in agriculture (the case of developing countries). The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 82(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00602.x

Zhao, Y. (2024). Tiktok and researcher positionality: considering the methodological and ethical implications of an experimental digital ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231221374




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i2.11334

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats

International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education is licensed under CC BY 4.0

ISSN: 3046-6946 (online)