Gagasan Model Pembelajaran Mobile–NOS Untuk Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa

Yusran Khery, Baiq Asma Nufida, Suryati Suryati, Sri Rahayu, Endang Budiasih

Abstract


This article describes the idea of a mobile learning model - NOS for enhancing
students' scientific literacy and student responses to these ideas. This article is
compiled based on literature studies, simple observations on several variables
supporting mobile learning at IKIP Mataram, and evaluating prospective user
responses to the development idea using a questionnaire. Respondents were 54
students of IKIP Mataram Chemistry education. The response data is processed
by percentage formula based on category criteria. Mobile-NOS learning is
learning that applies the Nature of Science (NOS) learning steps with the support
of learning media in the form of mobile applications that can be applied in smart
mobilephone. The six main steps in implementing learning are oriented to Nature
of Science (NOS), namely: (1) Reading the context on electronic articles; (2) Indepth
questioning; (3) Observation of cases and targets; (4) Demonstration
Procedure; (5) Library Search; (6) Implementing Procedures; (7)
Communicating Science Knowledge; and (8) Authentic Assessment.The results of
this study showed an average response to the idea of developing NOS-oriented
mobile learning at 85.23% with a very good category.

Keywords


Mobile Learning, Nature of Science (NOS), Science Literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd-ElKhalick, F., &Lederman, N.G. (2001). Improving science teachers‟ conceptions of

nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science

Education, 22(7), 665-701.

Alden, J. Accommodating Mobile Learning In College Programs. Journal of Asynchronous

Learning Networks, Volume 17: Issue 1 pp. 109-122

Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2013). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based

learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE).

Prospects Quarterly Review of Comparative Education ISSN 0033-1538.Prospects

DOI 10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7.

Cabanban, C. L.G. 2013.Development of Mobile Learning Using Android

Platform.International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science, Vol.

No. 1, pp. June, 2013. Artikel telah disajikan dalam : 3rd International Conference

on E-Learning and Knowledge Management Technology (ICEKMT 2013 ) ,

Bangkok, Thailand on April 6 - 7, 2013 pp. 98 – 106.

Calimag, J. N., Mugel, P. A., Conde, R. S., & Aquino, L. B. (2014). Ubquitous learning

environment using android mobile application. International Journal of Research

inEngineering & Technology, 2(2), 119-128.

Celik, S. 2014. Chemical Literacy Levels of Science and Mathematics Teacher Candidates.

Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 39(1).

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A.S., Nicoloch, M. (2014). Developing a measure of

scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education. 98: 549-580

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based

learning on students‟ science literacy skills and confidence. International journal for

the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16.

Hudson, D. (2014). Nature of science in the sience curriculum: origin, development,

implications and shifting emphasis. In Mattews, M.R (Eds), International Handbook

of Research in History, Phylosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 911-970). New York:

Springer

Hanafi, H. F., & Samsudin, K. (2012). Mobile learning environment system (MLES): the

case of Android-based learning application on undergraduates' learning. arXiv

preprint arXiv:1204.1839.

HANDOKO, E. A. (2012). Analisis hakikat sains (the nature of science) dalam buku teks

pelajaran kimia SMA kelas XI. SKRIPSI Jurusan Kimia-Fakultas MIPA UM.

Haristy, D. R., Enawaty, E., & Lestari, I. (2013). Pembelajaran Berbasis Literasi Sains pada

Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit di SMA Negeri 1 Pontianak. Jurnal

Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(12).

Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for

contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in

Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics

Education, 9 (6), 1459-1438

Lederman, N.G., And-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of

science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners‟

conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6):497-

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific

inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific

literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and

Technology, 1(3).

Laugksch, R. C. 2000. Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education,

(1),71-94.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098237X(200001)84:1<71::AIDSCE6>3.0.CO;2-C

New Zealand Curriculum Guides. (2013). Senior Secondary Science. Wellington: Ministry of

Education

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What „ideasaboutscience‟

should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of expert

community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7):692-720

PISA 2015.2013. Draft Science Framework, 1–54.

Rahayu, S. (2016). Mengembangkan Literasi Sains Anak Indonesia melalui Pembelajaran

Berorientasi NatureofScience. Makalah disampaikan pada Sidang Terbuka Senat

universitas Negeri Malang, 17 Maret 2016.

Ratnawati, E. (2013). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains (NOS) Mahasiswa Tahun Ketiga Program

Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang. SKRIPSI Jurusan Kimia-

Fakultas MIPA UM.

Rychen, D. S.,& Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Definition and Selection of Key

competencies: Executive Summary. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe

Santyasa, I. W. (2006). Pembelajaran inovatif: Model kolaboratif, basis proyek, dan orientasi

NOS. Semarapura: Makalah.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for

assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students, Journal

of Chemistry Education Research and Practice: 7(4), 203–225

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta

didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Tsaparlis, G. 2000. The states-of-matter approach (SOMA) to introductory chemistry.

Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 161-168.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a9rp90017a

UNEP. 2012. 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on

Emerging Environmental Issues. United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP).

Nairobi, Kenya.

Wenning, C. J. 2006. “A Framework for Teaching the Nature Of Science”. Journal of Physics

Teacher Education (Online, http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/jpteo. Diunduh tanggal 12

Oktober 2017).

Wiliam, D. 2010. What Counts as Evidence of Educational Achievement? The Role of

Constructs in the Pursuit of Equity in Assessment. Review of Research in Education,

, 254-284.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1600

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.