Email this article Integrating Constructivist and Inquiry Based Learning in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review
Abstract
This study systematically examines the integration of constructivist and inquirybased learning (IBL) strategies in chemistry education, emphasizing their transformative potential for enhancing student engagement, conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and problem solving skills. Utilizing a systematic review methodology, 30 peer reviewed articles from credible databases such as Scopus and Web of Science were analyzed. The findings reveal that gamification, virtual reality (VR), molecular visualization, and guided inquiry significantly improve learning outcomes by contextualizing abstract concepts and fostering active participation. Gamification and VR were particularly effective at the high school and tertiary education levels, respectively, while inquiry based laboratory activities enhanced higher-order thinking skills. The analysis highlights the theoretical alignment of these strategies with constructivist principles and their practical application in modern pedagogy. Despite their benefits, challenges such as resource limitations and insufficient teacher training persist, hindering wider adoption. Addressing these barriers through professional development, resource investment, and innovative curriculum design is essential for maximizing the impact of constructivist and IBL approaches. This study provides actionable recommendations for educators, policymakers, and researchers, advocating for systemic changes to advance chemistry education in diverse learning contexts. By combining theoretical insights with practical applications, this research underscores the importance of active, inquiry driven learning environments for preparing students to excel in STEM fields.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, U. A., Onowugbeda, F. U., Islami, N., & Ogolo, K. G. (2024). Fostering engagement and learning outcomes: a comparative analysis of ethnochemical and stem-based pedagogies for chemistry learning in vocational high schools. J. Pendidik. Sains, 12(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17977/jps.v12i12024p001
Aditomo, A. and Klieme, E. (2019). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems.. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/aqsbj
Ahmedi, V., Kurshumlija, A., & Ismajli, H. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards constructivist approach to improving learning outcomes: The case of Kosovo. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16124a
Aidoo, B., Anthony-Krueger, C., Gyampoh, A., Tsyawo, N., & Quansah, F. (2022). A mixed-method approach to investigate the effect of flipped inquiry-based learning on chemistry students’ learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12339
Akuma, F. and Callaghan, R. (2018). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry‐based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516
Aliev, R. (2023). Enhancing chemistry education’s relevance and comprehension through immersive virtual reality. Bio Web of Conferences, 76, 09006. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237609006
Al-Zahrani, A. (2023). Empowering girls' higher education through social learning platforms. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijvple.331383
Anfa, Q. (2021). Training natural science education students as a pre-service teacher in constructing assessment instruments of cognitive domain through constructivist classroom. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v6n1.p1-6
Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2020). Learning outcomes in online citizen science communities designed for inquiry. International Journal of Science Education Part B, 10(4), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1836689
Aşıksoy, G. and Özdamlı, F. (2017). The flipped classroom approach based on the 5e learning cycle model - 5elfa/nastavni pristup obrnute učionice uutemeljen na 5e modelu ciklusa učenja. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i4.2564
Asmara, J. (2023). Online learning in supporting students' procedural abilities viewed from a constructivist approach.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3466684/v1
Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D., & Rini, E. (2022). Gender analysis in measurement materials: critical thinking ability and science processing skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 11(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509
Aubrecht, K., Dori, Y., Holme, T., Lavi, R., Matlin, S., Orgill, M., … & Skaza-Acosta, H. (2019). Graphical tools for conceptualizing systems thinking in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2888-2900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00314
Azer, S. and Azer, D. (2014). Group interaction in problem‐based learning tutorials: a systematic review. European Journal of Dental Education, 19(4), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12121
Bamidele, E., Adetunji, A., Awodele, B., & Irinoye, J. (2013). Attitudes of nigerian secondary school chemistry students towards concept mapping strategies in learning the mole concept. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p475
Barak, M., Nissim, Y., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Aptness between teaching roles and teaching strategies in ict-integrated science lessons. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 7, 305-322. https://doi.org/10.28945/1526
Bardakci, S., Dilara, K., Derya, A., & Alkan, M. (2021). How to become a constructivist teacher: the impact of philosophical thoughts on constructivist learning beliefs. Research in Pedagogy, 11(1), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2101v214b
Barthlow, M. and Watson, S. (2014). The effectiveness of process‐oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12076
Bayram, A., Özsaban, A., Durgun, H., Aksoy, F., Turan, N., Dalcalı, B., … & Şahin, A. (2022). Nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses, critical thinking motivations, and problem‐solving skills during distance learning: a multicentral study. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 33(4), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12362
Beck, K., Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2010). Open experimentation on phenomena of chemical reactions via the learning company approach in early secondary chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237
Berry, M. (2023). Automated messaging delivered alongside behavioral treatment for weight loss: qualitative study. Jmir Formative Research, 7, e50872. https://doi.org/10.2196/50872
Bishop, R. (2023). The inclusion of adults with intellectual disabilities in health research – challenges, barriers and opportunities: a mixed‐method study among stakeholders in england. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 68(2), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13097
Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Adumat, S., Rogan-Klyve, A., & Bouwma, A. (2019). Modeling tropical diversity in the undergraduate classroom: novel curriculum to engage students in authentic scientific practices. The American Biology Teacher, 81(6), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2019.81.6.417
Bramasta, I., Suartama, I., & Sudarma, I. (2022). Mesari (melajah aksara bali): interactive multimedia based on local wisdom for seventh grade in junior high school. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(2), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i2.48979
Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Christensson, C. (2020). Relevant or interesting according to upper secondary students? affective aspects of context-based chemistry problems. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(4), 478-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1824177
Burgh, G. and Nichols, K. (2012). The parallels between philosophical inquiry and scientific inquiry: implications for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1045-1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00751.x
Cabalsa, J. and Abraham, L. (2020). Exploring biochemical reactions of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids through a milk-based demonstration and an inquiry-based worksheet: a covid-19 laboratory experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2669-2677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00666
Cahyani, D., Yunita, F., & Ubaidillah, M. (2022). Application of inquiry collaborative constructivism model in biology learning respiratory system to improve students' critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (Jps), 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.10.1.2022.28-35
Cahyono, A., Asikin, M., Zahid, M., Laksmiwati, P., & Miftahudin, M. (2021). The roboste[m] project: using robotics learning in a stem education model to help prospective mathematics teachers promote students’ 21st-centuryskills. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.5
Chang, B. (2019). Reflection in learning. Online Learning, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1447
Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: analysis of a new learning management model for thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
Chen, Q. (2023). The influence of constructivist learning style on college students' learning of basic subjects. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 22(1), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/22/20230334
Corr, C., Snodgrass, M., Love, H., Scott, I., Kim, J., & Andrews, L. (2020). Exploring the landscape of published mixed methods research in special education: a systematic review. Remedial and Special Education, 42(5), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520924030
Cullipher, S., Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2015). Reasoning about benefits, costs, and risks of chemical substances: Mapping different levels of sophistication. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00025d
Daher, W., Diab, H., & Rayan, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence generative tools and conceptual knowledge in problem-solving in chemistry. Information, 14(7), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070409
Daudt, H., d'Archangelo, M., & Duquette, D. (2018). Spiritual care training in healthcare: does it really have an impact?. Palliative & Supportive Care, 17(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951517001134
Deng, X. (2023). Applying hands-on inquiry learning in physical chemistry teaching practice to improve teaching quality. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 57(4), 1175-1182. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.57.4.140
Dewi, C., Inayah, S., Purba, L., & Awaliyah, N. (2023). Student perceptions of online-based chemistry learning implementation during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 9(6), 4827-4835. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.4098
Diery, A., Vogel, F., Knogler, M., & Seidel, T. (2020). Evidence-based practice in higher education: teacher educators' attitudes, challenges, and uses. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00062
Duis, J. (2011). Organic chemistry educators’ perspectives on fundamental concepts and misconceptions: an exploratory study. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 346-350. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1007266
Duran, M. and Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
Dymond, S., Butler, A., Hopkins, S., & Patton, K. (2018). Curriculum and context: trends in interventions with transition-age students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918768776
Eilks, I., Gulacar, O., & Sandoval, J. (2018). Exploring the mysterious substances, X and Y: Challenging students’ thinking on acid–base chemistry and chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(4), 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00404
Elisanti, E., Sajidan, S., & Prayitno, B. (2018). The effectiveness of inquiry lesson-based immunity system module to empower the students’ critical thinking skill. Edusains, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i1.7259
Eom, S. and Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: an update*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097
Erdem, E., Özgür, S., Bayram, Z., Oskay, Ö., & Şen, Ş. (2014). Self-regulated learning in constructivist approach based science laboratory practices and opinions on constructivist approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 59(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/14.59.25
Fajardo, M. and Bacarrisas, P. (2017). First-year college students’ knowledge in chemistry: is it adequate?. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1039-1043. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-10-5
Fang, G. and Teo, T. (2021). Investigating the associations of constructivist beliefs and classroom climate on teachers' self-efficacy among australian secondary mathematics teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626271
Faqih, A. (2023). Analysis of farmers' response to the rice farm insurance program (autp). Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 3(8), 1405-1414. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i8.876
Ferreira, D., Sentanin, F., Parra, K., Bonini, V., Castro, M., & Kasseboehmer, A. (2021). Implementation of inquiry-based science in the classroom and its repercussion on the motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00287
Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., … & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Furtak, E., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Goldschmidt, M. and Bogner, F. (2015). Learning about genetic engineering in an outreach laboratory: influence of motivation and gender on students’ cognitive achievement. International Journal of Science Education Part B, 6(2), 166-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1031293
Goodwin, A., Smith, L., Souto‐Manning, M., Cheruvu, R., Tan, M., Reed, R., … & Taveras, L. (2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114535266
Gu, X., Song, X., Sun, H., Dong, M., Jing, L., Liu, G., … & Wu, J. (2016). Teaching reform of pharmaceutical chemistry with pbl method. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 50(4), 530-533. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.50.4.4
Gunawan, G., Suranti, N., Nisrina, N., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Students’ problem-solving skill in physics teaching with virtual labs. Ijpte International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 10. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.24952
Gunnulfsen, A. (2021). Applying the integration dimensions of quantitative and qualitative methods in education policy research: lessons learned from investigating micro policymaking in norwegian schools. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211028349
Guo, F., Young, J., Deese, N., Pickens-Flynn, T., Sellers, D., Perkins, D., … & Yakubu, M. (2021). Promoting the diversity, equity, and inclusion in organic chemistry education through undergraduate research experiences at wssu. Education Sciences, 11(8), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080394
Gupta, A. and Sharma, A. (2017). An assessment of the chemistry laboratory learning environments and teacher student interactions at the higher secondary level. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2017.1713
Gupta, A., & Sharma, A. (2017). An assessment of the chemistry laboratory learning environments and teacher-student interactions at the higher secondary level. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2017.1713
Harahap, F., Situmorang, M., & Nurfajriani, N. (2022). The development of guided inquiry-based learning resources as a strategy to achieve student competence in analytical chemistry.. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2022.2324794
Harta, J., Pamenang, F., Listyarini, R., Wijayanti, L., Hapsari, N., Ratri, M., & Lee, W. (2019). Analysis students’ science process skills in senior high school practicum based on small scale chemistry (ssc). Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v8i3.31857
Hasan, R., Lukitasari, M., Utami, S., & Anizar, A. (2019). The activeness, critical, and creative thinking skills of students in the lesson study-based inquiry and cooperative learning. Jpbi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7328
Hendratmoko, A. (2023). The impact of inquiry-based online learning with virtual laboratories on students’ scientific argumentation skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1129263
Hunt, P., McDonnell, J., & Crockett, M. (2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812804153471
Ibad, E. (2018). The effect of inquiry based chemistry laboratory on critical thinking. Journal of International Scientific Researches. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.423570
Islam, R., Haidoub, I., & Tarique, K. (2019). Enhancing quality of education: a case study on an international islamic school. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(Supp. 1), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.s1.10
Jensen, M., Mattheis, A., & Johnson, B. (2012). Using student learning and development outcomes to evaluate a first-year undergraduate group video project. Cbe—life Sciences Education, 11(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-06-0049
Jordan, C. (2013). Comparison of international baccalaureate (ib) chemistry students’ preferred vs actual experience with a constructivist style of learning in a moodle e‐learning environment. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311323397
Juntunen, M. and Aksela, M. (2013). Life-cycle thinking in inquiry-based sustainability education – effects on students’ attitudes towards chemistry and environmental literacy. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.244
Kaatrakoski, H., Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2016). Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within open educational practice. Higher Education, 74(4), 599-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0067-z
Kanapathy, S., Lee, K., Mokhtar, M., Zakaria, S., Sivapalan, S., & Zahidi, A. (2019). Sustainable chemistry teaching at the pre-university level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(4), 784-802. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-10-2018-0186
Karpudewan, M., Ismail, Z., & Mohamed, N. (2011). Greening a chemistry teaching methods course at the school of educational studies, universiti sains malaysia. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340821100500210
Karpudewan, M., Roth, W., & Sinniah, D. (2016). The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students' understanding of acid–base concepts and argumentation skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 893-901. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00079g
Karyadi, P., Paristiowati, M., & Afrizal, A. (2020). Analysis the 21st century skills of students in chemical equilibrium learning with flipped classroom-collaborative problem solving model. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 5(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v5i1.7971
Kausar, A., Maryono, D., & Aristyagama, Y. (2021). Effective use of blended learning flipped classroom type reviewed from student learning outcomes in digital simulation subjects at smk negeri 3 surakarta. Journal of Informatics and Vocational Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/joive.v3i3.47248
Kırkıç, K. and Arıkan, E. (2023). Primary school teachers’ attitudes and views toward stem education. Science Education International, 34(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i2.7
Konst, T. and Scheinin, M. (2020). Why education 4.0 is not enough – education for sustainable future.. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.1661
Kucharczyk, S., Reutebuch, C., Carter, E., Hedges, S., Zein, F., Fan, H., & Gustafson, J. (2015). Addressing the needs of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563703
Kuter, S. and Özer, B. (2020). Student teachers’ experiences of constructivism in a theoretical course built on inquiry-based learning. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.7m
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lazonder, A. and Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Li, J. (2024). Molecular visualization device for education purposes: a novel approach for pedagogical enhancement in chemistry education.. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2024.140432
Li, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, D., & Hu, W. (2021). Curriculum innovation in times of the covid-19 pandemic: the thinking-based instruction theory and its application. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601607
Lieber, L. and Graulich, N. (2020). Thinking in alternatives—a task design for challenging students’ problem-solving approaches in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3731-3738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00248
Loshbaugh, H., Laursen, S., & Thiry, H. (2011). Reactions to changing times: trends and tensions in u.s. chemistry graduate education. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 708-715. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1008574
Mack, M. and Towns, M. (2016). Faculty beliefs about the purposes for teaching undergraduate physical chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00148j
Maeng, J., Whitworth, B., Bell, R., & Sterling, D. (2020). The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform‐based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21562
Mahaffey, A. (2020). Mock urinalysis demonstration: Making connections among acid–base chemistry, redox reactions, and healthcare in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1976–1983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01086
Mahaffey, A. (2020). Mock urinalysis demonstration: making connections among acid–base chemistry, redox reactions, and healthcare in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1976-1983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01086
Mahato, P., Angell, C., Teijlingen, E., & Simkhada, P. (2018). Using mixed-methods research in health & education in nepal. Journal of Health Promotion, 6, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.3126/jhp.v6i0.21803
Manan, A., Susanto, S., Yudianto, E. (2024). Developing the geometry teaching module by using a metacognitive approach in kurikulum merdeka to improve the students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 07(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i5-14
Mandler, D., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Blonder, R., Yayon, M., & Hofstein, A. (2012). High-school chemistry teaching through environmentally oriented curricula. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90071d
Mangubat, F. (2023). Anecdotes of university students in learning chemistry: a philippine context. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 12(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.42120
Marshall, J., Smart, J., Lotter, C., & Sirbu, C. (2011). Comparative analysis of two inquiry observational protocols: striving to better understand the quality of teacher‐facilitated inquiry‐based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 111(6), 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00091.x
McGaghie, W., Issenberg, S., Petrusa, E., & Scalese, R. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003â“2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., & Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with steam and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
Michelene, T., Adams, J., Bogusch, E., Bruchok, C., Kang, S., Lancaster, M., & Yaghmourian, D. (2018). Translating the icap theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1777-1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12626
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2012). Increasing interactivity and authenticity of chemistry instruction through data acquisition systems and other technologies. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 477-481. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1008443
Mitchell, E., Amer, Z., DiPillo, M., Mccall, M., & Wieser, S. (2021). University–church partnerships: a mechanism to enhance relationship health. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 51(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2021.1924595
Mohammed, S. and Amponsah, K. (2021). Teachers’ and educational administrators’ conceptions of inquiry: do they promote or constrain inquiry-based science teaching in junior high schools?. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 10(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v10n3p58
Moreno, R., Özoğul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: effects on students' problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021995
Morgan, K., Campbell, K., Sargeant, S., & Reidlinger, D. (2019). Preparing our future workforce: a qualitative exploration of dietetics practice educators’ experiences. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 32(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12620
Morgan, K., Reidlinger, D., Sargeant, S., Crane, L., & Campbell, K. (2018). Challenges in preparing the dietetics workforce of the future: an exploration of dietetics educators’ experiences. Nutrition & Dietetics, 76(4), 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12438
Mulyanti, S., Mardhiya, J., & Solihah, M. (2022). Perspectives on green chemistry and the application of nvivo 12 software: a case study of pandemic period in chemistry education. Scientiae Educatia, 11(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v11i1.10280
Neally, K. (2022). An analysis of the underrepresentation of minoritized groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics, 122(5), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12542
Ngah, R., Junid, J., & Osman, C. (2019). The links between role of educators, self-directed learning, constructivist learning environment and entrepreneurial endeavor: technology entrepreneurship pedagogical approach. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 414-427. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.25
Noguera, I., Albó, L., & Beardsley, M. (2022). University students’ preference for flexible teaching models that foster constructivist learning practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7968
Ntim, S., Opoku-Manu, M., & Kwarteng, A. (2021). Post covid-19 and the potential of blended learning in higher institutions: exploring students and lecturers perspectives on learning outcomes in blended learning. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(6), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.6.162
Nusantoro, E., Kurniawan, K., & Suharso, S. (2017). Graduate profile of guidance and counseling department faculty of education universitas negeri semarang. Couns-Edu| the International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(2), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.23916/002017026820
Ocak, G. and Eğmir, E. (2016). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ critical thinking tendencies and problem solving skills. Participatory Educational Research, spi16(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.16.spi.2.4
Onwuegbuzie, A., Collins, K., Leech, N., & Jiao, Q. (2010). Mixed data collection and analysis for conducting research on giftedness and beyond.., 113-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/12079-006
Osman, K. and Sukor, N. (2013). Conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: a discussion of the difficulties experienced by students. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2013.433.441
Othman, M. (2024). A journey into the thrilling depths of chemistry through gamification. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i2.349
Pagliaro, M. (2019). Chemistry education fostering creativity in the digital era. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6-7), 565-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800179
Pecore, J. (2012). Beyond beliefs: teachers adapting problem-based learning to preexisting systems of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1359
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., Jong, T., Riesen, S., Kamp, E., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pence, H. and Losoff, B. (2011). Going beyond the textbook: the need to integrate open access primary literature into the chemistry curriculum. Chemistry Central Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153x-5-18
Pernaa, J. and Wiedmer, S. (2019). A systematic review of 3d printing in chemistry education – analysis of earlier research and educational use through technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Chemistry Teacher International, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0005
Pramila‐Savukoski, S., Juntunen, J., Tuomikoski, A., Kääriäinen, M., Tomietto, M., Kaučič, B., & Mikkonen, K. (2019). Mentors' self‐assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(5-6), 684-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15127
Pratiwi, I., Ismanisa, I., & Nugraha, A. (2019). Development of guided inquiry-based modules to improve learning outcomes and metacognition skills of students. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v11i2.14462
Pratiwi, I., Ismanisa, I., & Nugraha, A. (2019). Development of guided inquiry based modules to improve learning outcomes and metacognition skills of student. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v11i2.14462
Pratiwi, I., Ismanisa, I., & Nugraha, A. (2019). Development of guided inquiry based modules to improve learning outcomes and metacognition skills of student. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v11i2.14462
Prayitno, B., Widoretno, S., & Titikusumawati, E. (2022). Effectiveness of collaborative constructivist strategies to minimize gaps in students’ understanding of biological concepts. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 17(11), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29891
Purba, R. (2021). The effectiveness combination of blended learning and flipped classroom with edmodo as a digital media innovation for learning from home. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.36210
Putri, A., Hadi, M., & Izzah, L. (2021). Analysis the influence of online learning on students' learning enthusiasm. Jetl (Journal of Education Teaching and Learning), 6(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v6i1.2312
Ralph, V., Scharlott, L., Schwarz, C., Becker, N., & Stowe, R. (2022). Beyond instructional practices: Characterizing learning environments that support students in explaining chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(5), 841–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21746
Ralph, V., Scharlott, L., Schwarz, C., Becker, N., & Stowe, R. (2022). Beyond instructional practices: characterizing learning environments that support students in explaining chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(5), 841-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21746
Reib, M., Hoyles, C., Mujtaba, T., B, R., Rodd, M., Simon, S., & Stylianidou, F. (2011). Understanding participation rates in post-16 mathematics and physics: conceptualising and operationalising the upmap project. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 273-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9286-z
Rendoth, T., Duncan, J., & Foggett, J. (2021). Inclusive curricula for students with severe intellectual disabilities or profound and multiple learning difficulties: a scoping review. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 22(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12544
Rodriguez, J. (2024). Self-reported limitations in chemistry education research: providing specific and contextualized limitations supports researchers and practitioners. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(7), 2602-2607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00217
Ryu, M., Nardo, J., & Wu, M. (2018). An examination of preservice elementary teachers’ representations about chemistry in an intertextuality- and modeling-based course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 681-693. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00150a
Şahin, U. (2013). The classroom teachers’ skılls to organıze constructıvıst learnıng envıronment. International Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20130202.11
Samosir, B. (2022). Implementation of process oriented guided inquiry learning model learning (pogil) on understanding of science concepts, skills science process and student's critical thinking ability. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 3(9), 1673-1682. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.09.08
Sandlin, B., Harshman, J., & Yezierski, E. (2015). Formative assessment in high school chemistry teaching: investigating the alignment of teachers’ goals with their items. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1619-1625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00163
Sari, M. and Muchlis, M. (2022). Improving critical thinking skills of high school students through guided inquiry implementation for learning reaction rate concept in chemistry. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3278
Schrader, D. (2015). Constructivism and learning in the age of social media: changing minds and learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(144), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20160
Shamir‐Inbal, T. and Blau, I. (2021). Active learning by visual programming: pedagogical perspectives of instructivist and constructivist code teachers and their implications on actual teaching strategies and students’ programming artifacts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 28-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211017793
Shatayeva, A., Boranbayeva, A., Massaliyeva, Z., Batayev, D., & Makina, L. (2022). Technologies used in teaching children with special educational needs by future chemistry teacher. World Journal on Educational Technology Current Issues, 14(4), 1152-1162. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i4.7672
She, H., Lin, H., & Huang, L. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the programme for international student assessment 2015 (pisa 2015) performance of students in taiwan: the role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21553
Siddique, M. (2023). The role of resilience for developing the self-efficacy among chemistry students in pakistan. Vfast Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 11(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i1.1401
Situmorang, M., Sinaga, M., Sitorus, M., & Sudrajat, A. (2022). Implementation of project-based learning innovation to develop students’ critical thinking skills as a strategy to achieve analytical chemistry competencies. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 56(1s), s41–s51. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.56.1s.41
Soicher, R., Becker-Blease, K., & Bostwick, K. (2019). Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f5kds
Sugano, S. and Nabua, E. (2020). Meta-analysis on the effects of teaching methods on academic performance in chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 881-894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13259a
Suningsih, T., Rukiyah, R., & Andarini, R. (2023). Development of digital teaching material in the south sumatra traditional games course. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v10i1.54862
Suprabha, K. and Subramonian, G. (2021). Higher secondary commerce students’ engagement and attitude towards blended learning environment. Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v3i2.2965
Susilawati, D., Prayogo, T., & Santoso, A. (2022). Appreciative inquiry approach in limited face-to-face learning at sman 1 pusakanagara. Edunesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v3i2.225
Sutarto, S., Indrawati, I., Prihatin,J., Dwi, P. A.(2018). Geometrical optics process image-based worksheets for enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills and self-regulated learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14563
Syahgiah, L. (2023). Effects of inquiry learning on students' science process skills and critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Jurnal Pendidik IPA, 1(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol1-iss1/9
Syahid, A. (2023). Meta-analysis of constructivist learning models in improving student learning outcomes. Tafkir Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 4(4), 625-634. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v4i4.718
Szozda, A. (2024). “systems thinking (st) encourages a safe space to offer different perspectives and insights”: student perspectives and experiences with st activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(6), 2290-2307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00080
Szozda, A., Bruyere, K., Lee, H., Mahaffy, P., & Flynn, A. (2022). Investigating educators’ perspectives toward systems thinking in chemistry education from international contexts. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2474-2483. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00138
Szteinberg, G., Balicki, S., Banks, G., Clinchot, M., Cullipher, S., Huie, R., & Sevian, H. (2014). Collaborative professional development in chemistry education research: bridging the gap between research and practice. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1401-1408. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5003042
Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn't always better: the curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.006
Terrion, J. and Aceti, V. (2012). Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement: a study of freshmen chemistry students. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2), 16150. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16150
Tham, T., Burr, B., & Boohan, M. (2017). Evaluation of feedback given to trainees in medical specialties. Clinical Medicine, 17(4), 303-306. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-303
Theobald, E., Hill, M., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E., Behling, S., & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
Thomas, A., Menon, A., Boruff, J., Rodríguez, A., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-54
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students' chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., Masykuri, M., & Sutanto, A. (2017). Implementation of problem solving with concept map to improve critical thinking skills and chemistry learning achievement.. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.39
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Vintere, A. (2018). A constructivist approach to the teaching of mathematics to boost competences needed for sustainable development. Rural Sustainability Research, 39(334), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2018-0001
Walker, P., Carson, K., Jarvis, J., McMillan, J., Noble, A., Armstrong, D., & Palmer, C. (2018). How do educators of students with disabilities in specialist settings understand and apply the australian curriculum framework?. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 42(02), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2018.13
Walters, L. (2015). Perceptions of the effects of a constructivist classroom approach on academic service-learning: an exploratory study. The BRC Academy Journal of Business, 5(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.15239/j.brcacadjb.2015.04.01.ja03
Wan, Y. and Bi, H. (2015). Representation and analysis of chemistry core ideas in science education standards between china and the united states. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500861g
Wardani, S., Nurhayati, Safitri, S., A. (2016). The effectiveness of the guided inquiry learning module towards students. International Journal of Science and Research (Ijsr), 5(6), 1589-1594. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i6.nov164512
Watagodakumbura, C. (2015). Reviewing the purpose of education and challenges faced in implementing sound pedagogical practices in the presence of emerging evidence from neuroscience. World Journal of Education, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n6p23
Wati, S., Idrus, A., & Syukur, A. (2021). Analysis of student scientific literacy: study on learning using ethnoscience integrated science teaching materials based on guided inquiry. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(5), 624-630. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i5.2292
Weil, L., Fleming, S., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E., Weil, R., Rees, G., … & Blakemore, S. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004
Wells, T., Matthews, J., Caudle, L., Lunceford, C., Clement, B., & Anderson, R. (2015). The infusion of inquiry-based learning into school-based agricultural education: a review of literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04170
Wiles, M. (2019). Designing a 21st century chiropractic educational program: a time for reflection, a time for action. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 34(2), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.7899/jce-18-31
Wilhelm, J. and Fisher, M. (2019). Creating academic teacher scholars in stem education by preparing preservice teachers as researchers., 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6_18
Windasari, W., Karwanto, K., Supriyanto, S., & Setiani, P. (2022). Factors affecting teacher digital competence : an exploratory factor analysis. Jurnal Kependidikan Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 8(4), 1029. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i4.6095
Witri, R. (2023). Integrated green chemistry problem-based learning module development to improve science process skills senior high school students on basic chemicals law. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 9(8), 6188-6196. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4380
Wright, L., Fisk, J., & Newman, D. (2014). Dna → rna: what do students think the arrow means?. Cbe life Sciences Education, 13(2), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.cbe-13-09-0188
Wu, M. and Yezierski, E. (2023). Secondary chemistry teacher learning: precursors for and mechanisms of pedagogical conceptual change. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00160h
Yakar, U., Sulu, A., & Calis, N. (2020). From constructivist educational technology to mobile constructivism: how mobile learning serves constructivism?. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.818487
Yong, L., Xin, X., Wee, J., Poopalalingam, R., Kwek, K., & Thumboo, J. (2020). Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of covid-19 pandemic in singapore. BMC Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2
Yuksel, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of the chemistry education by using the analytic hierarchy process. International Education Studies, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n5p79
Yulkifli, Y., Jaafar, R., & Resnita, L. (2020). Developing student worksheets using inquiry-based learning model with scientific approach to improve tenth grade students’ physics competence. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (Jpfa), 10(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n1.p56-70
Zhang, X. (2019). An empirical approach and implications for teachers to begin constructivist teaching. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 07(10), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.710032
Zoller, U. (2012). Science education for global sustainability: What is necessary for teaching, learning, and assessment strategies? Journal of Chemical Education, 89(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300047v
ssИванова, Е., Klarin, M., & Osmolovskaya, I. (2021). Topical directions of didactics development in the xxi century. SHS Web of Conferences, 101, 03016. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110103016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i5.13571
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.