Validity of STEM-CT Based Textbooks to Improve Students Multi-Representation Ability

A. Mafaza Kanzul Fikri, I Ketut Mahardika, Slamet Hariyadi

Abstract


This research aims to describe the validity of STEM-CT-based textbooks in improving multi-representation abilities in MTs students. This study used the Research and Development (R&D) method using the 4D model, which consists of four stages, i.e., Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. However, this study only discussed preparing textbooks' Define, Design, and Develop stages. The research participants were teachers of the Science MGMP in Banyuwangi. The data collection techniques used in this research were interviews, questionnaires, and validation sheets. The analysis used in this research was descriptive and qualitative. The data processing results for STEM-CT-based textbooks to improve multi-representational abilities in MTs students obtained a validity value of 82.86 in the very valid or usable category. The validation results showed that the STEM-CT-based textbooks developed could be used for classroom learning to improve students' multi-representation abilities.


Keywords


Multi-Representation; STEM-CT Based Textbooks; Validity.

References


Akhmad, E., Saleh, Y. R., & Pakaya, S. (2022). The Criteria of Good English Textbook for Students: A Senior English Textbook Analysis. Eloquence: Journal of Foreign Language, 1(3), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v1i3.454

Amalia, A. F., Aini, N., & Pradani, R. Y. (2022). Pengembangan Video Tutorial Pewarnaan Tekstur Bahan Sesuai Desain Di SMK Negeri 3 Malang. JVTE: Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 4(2), 26–32.

Aregehagn, E., Lykknes, A., Getahun, D. A., & Febri, M. I. M. (2023). Representation of Image Formation-Observation in Optics in Ethiopian Textbooks: Student Learning Difficulties as an Analytical Tool. Education Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050445

Behnke, Y. (2018). Textbook Effects and Efficacy. In The palgrave handbook of textbook studies (pp. 383–398). Palgrave Macmillan.

Cahyani, S., & Perdana, S. (2019). Textbooks Evaluation by Ur’s Theory. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2(2), 162–171.

Candra, P. M., Mercuriani, I. S., Nugroho, E. D., & Vlorensius, V. (2020). The Biological Content Accuracy of Natural Science Textbooks for VIII Grade. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10837

Cook, D. A., & Hatala, R. (2016). Validation of Educational Assessments: A Primer for Simulation and Beyond. Advances in Simulation, 1(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y

diSessa, A. A. (2018). Computational Literacy and “the Big Picture” Concerning Computers in Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544

Elvionita, S., Fauzi, A., & Ratnawulan. (2019). Evaluating the Validity of Integrated Science Textbook on the Theme of Tsunami Using Webbed Model Based on Polya Problem Solving to Enhance Students’ Preparedness Toward Disaster. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012062

Eshaq, H. A. (2024). The Effect of Using STEM Education on Students’ Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423476

Gürsoy, K., Bebek, G., & Bülbül, S. (2023). The Effect of STEM Education Practices on Academic Achievement and Scientific Process Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202324071

Hussain, S., & Khan, K. (2022). The Role of Images in the Teaching and Learning of English: Practices, Issues, and Possibilities. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(4), 338–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-IV)31

Lafifa, F., Rosana, D., Suyanta, Nurohman, S., & Astuti, S. R. D. (2023). Integrated STEM Approach to Improve 21st Century Skills in Indonesia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i2.219

Li, F., & Wang, L. (2024). A Study on Textbook Use and Its Effects on Students’ Academic Performance. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00094-1

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w

Lubis, N. Z., Kaban, B. J., Nababan, S. A., Nugraha, M. A., Kusbiantoro, D., Hardiyansyah, M. R., & Alkhairi, F. (2023). Implementation of History Textbooks as A Learning Resource at SMA Brigjend Katamso 1 Medan. Jurnal Penelitian, Pemikiran, Dan Pengabdian, 11(1), 22–28.

Mariani, D. & Usmeldi. (2019). Needs Analysis in the Development of Natural Science Student Books Connected Type Integrated of Local Cultural Wisdom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012071

Murtadho, M. A. A., Eryansyah, & Silvhiany, S. (2024). Multimodal Content Analysis of 21st Century Skills in an English Textbook. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 361–371.

Muyassaroh, I., & Sunaryati, T. (2021). Urgensi Pengembangan Buku Dongeng Movable Berbasis Etnosains Sebagai Bahan Ajar Penunjang Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Ar-Riayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd. v5i1.2683

Ng, S. B. (2019). Exploring STEM Competences for the 21st Century. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368485

Nurmalasari, L., Akhbar, M. T., & Syaflin, S. L. (2022). Pengembangan Media Kartu Hewan Dan Tumbuhan (TUTUHETU) Pada Pembelajaran IPA Kelas IV SD Negeri. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26618/jrpd.v5i1.6291

Nursyahrifa, Mukhaiyar, & Jufrizal. (2019). Textbooks Evaluation: To What Extent Do the English Textbooks Provide Learning to Promote Cognitive Skill? Metathesis: Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching, 3(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.31002/ metathesis.v3i1.1250

Pasaribu, A. N. (2022). The EFL Students’ Perceptions of the Quality of the English Language Textbook. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(2), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i2.6242

Rochim, F. N., Munawaroh, F., Wulandari, A. Y. R., & Ahied, M. (2019). Identifikasi Profil Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Cahaya Menggunakan Metode Four Tier Test Dengan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Natural Science Education Reseach, 2(2), 140–149.

Samsinar, S. (2019). Urgensi Learning Resources (Sumber Belajar) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Didaktika : Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 194–205.

Schmitt, R., Falk, B., & Frank, D. (2015). Efficient Validation During Product Development Using a Self-Optimizing Inspection System. Procedia CIRP, 33, 47–52.

Sharma, M., & Ankit, P. (2023). Importance of Education in This Challenging World. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 11(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v11i3.11408

Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and Development in Research on Computational Thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6499–6529.

Tenti, N. P., Asrizal, Murtiani, & Gusnedi. (2020). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Integration STEM Education in Various Learning Models on Student Physics Learning Outcomes. Pillar of Physics Education, 13(4), 520–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/10331171074

Uzun, S., & Şen, N. (2023). The Effects of a STEM-Based Intervention on Middle School Students’ Science Achievement and Learning Motivation. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319315

Yang, D.-C., & Sianturi, I. A. (2017). An Analysis of Singaporean Versus Indonesian Textbooks Based on Trigonometry Content. Eurasia: Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3829–3848. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a

Zubaidah, S., Fatmawati, A., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo. (2023). Representation Skills of Students with Different Ability Levels When Learning Using the LCMR Model. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.20




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i3.11488

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Paedagogy

ISSN: 2722-4627 (Online)

Published by Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi (FIPP)

Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA)

Email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.