Exploring Google Calssroom-Based Writing Assessment in EFL Classrooms: A Lesson from Semi-Rural Indonesian Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i4.20963Keywords:
Digital writing assessment, Google classroom, Recount text, Formative assessment, Semi-rural schoolsAbstract
Writing is a complex skill that requires learners to integrate ideas, language knowledge, and genre awareness. Providing formative feedback can be challenging in digitally constrained semi-rural school contexts, particularly when students have digital literacy and technological skills. This study aimed to explore (1) the aspects of writing assessed by the teacher, (2) the process of digital writing assessment through Google Classroom, and (3) students’ responses to the assessment. The study employed an exploratory qualitative case-study design in a Grade VIII classroom at a semi-rural public junior high school in Central Java. Participants were one English teacher and fifteen students, five of whom participated in interviews. Data were collected over four weeks through classroom observations, interviews, document analysis, and Google Classroom records, supported by observation guidelines and interview protocols, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that the teacher employed an analytic, genre-based assessment covering content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics, with particular emphasis on recount-text structure and grammatical accuracy, especially the use of the Simple Past Tense. Google Classroom supported a systematic assessment process involving assignment distribution, rubric-based assessment, digital submission, teacher feedback, revision opportunities, and grading. Students responded positively, reporting greater motivation, engagement, responsibility, and perceived improvement in their writing. Despite technological and time constraints, teachers and students adapted collaboratively. The study suggests that digital writing assessment depends on technology, pedagogical strategies, formative feedback, and students’ digital readiness.
References
Afzal, A., Khan, S., Daud, S., Ahmad, Z., & Butt, A. (2023). Addressing the digital divide: Access and use of technology in education. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.326
Ahmad, M., Wilkins, S., & Neil. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Albashtawi, A., & Al Bataineh, K. B. (2020). The effectiveness of Google Classroom among EFL students in Jordan: An innovative teaching and learning online platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.12865
Almås, H., Pinkow, F., & Giæver, F. (2023). Reimagining how to understand learning game experiences: A qualitative and exploratory case study. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 14, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00234-0
Amalina, I., & Yulianto, H. J. (2024). Analysing tenth-grade students’ difficulty and their perceptions in writing recount text. English Education Journal, 14(3), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.15294/6c15jt72
Asror, K., Fadhilawati, D., & Aini, M. R. (2024). Lifting eighth-grade students’ recount text writing skills through mind mapping. Academy of Education Journal, 15(1), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2221
Becker, A. (1980). A review of writing model research based on cognitive processes. In Revision: History, theory, and practice (pp. 25–49). Parlor Press.
Cahyani, F., Yuliana, B. D., & Putri, K. (2025). Peran media digital dalam meningkatkan motivasi menulis kreatif di kalangan mahasiswa. Jurnal Bima: Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 3(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v3i3.2181
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Ghosh, A., & Sen, S. (2023). Relationship between different components of English writing skill. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(10), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20231058
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Graves, J., Abshire, D., Amiri, S., & Mackelprang, J. (2021). Disparities in technology and broadband internet access across rurality: Implications for health and education. Family & Community Health, 44(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000306
Hadizadeh, A., & Kanık, M. (2025). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of academic writing at the intersection of English medium instruction and the digital age. European Journal of Education, 60(3), Article e70162. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70162
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Kakar, Z., Rasheed, R., Rashid, A., & Akhter, S. (2023). Criteria for assessing and ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. International Journal of Business Reflections. https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44
Karunia, N. (2019). Qualitative research design. In SAGE Research Methods Foundations. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-51
Kurniawati, K. (2022). The students’ perception towards peer feedback as social-affective strategy in writing recount text skill. Journal of English Educational Study, 5(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v5i1.1609
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Mochizuki, N. (2025). EFL undergraduate students’ thinking and awareness in genre-based writing: Conceptualizing rhetorical moves and experimenting with linguistic knowledge. Journal of Second Language Writing, 70, Article 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101243
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2021). Thriving or surviving emergency remote teaching necessitated by COVID-19: University teachers’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00567-9
Moussaoui, S. (2024). Enhancing writing quality and self-efficacy beliefs through process-oriented task-based instruction and multiple feedback forms. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 18(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.53543/jeps.vol18iss1pp96-116
Mustafa, F., Nguyen, H., & Gao, X. (2024). The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
Mustika, R., Nurdin, N. E., & Sakina, R. (2021). Theme and thematic progression in students’ recount texts: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. In Proceedings (pp. 196–203). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210312.030
Nguyen, T., & Truong, A. (2021). EFL teachers’ perceptions of classroom writing assessment at high schools in Central Vietnam. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.06
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2020). Triangulation and member checking. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(6), 407. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12383
Nurhayati, A. (2020). The implementation of formative assessment in EFL writing: A case study at a secondary school in Indonesia. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2263
Odendahl, N., Fowles, M., Bivens-Tatum, J., Deane, P., Quinlan, T., & Welsh, C. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill.
Ouafi, A. (2017). Students’ use of information from their readings to write an argumentative essay. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 35(1), 25–41.
Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 564294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Panadero, E., Fernández-Ortube, A., Krebs, R., & Roelle, J. (2025). Analysis of online rubric platforms: Advancing toward e-rubrics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2345657
Phạm, V., & Bui, T. (2021). Genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n2p95
Phuong, H., Phan, Q.-T., & Le, T.-T. (2023). The effects of using analytical rubrics in peer and self-assessment on EFL students’ writing proficiency: A Vietnamese contextual study. Language Testing in Asia, 13, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00256-y
Ramadani, N., & Melani, M. (2023). An analysis of teacher’s assessment task in teaching writing at MAS TI Paninggahan. Journal of Educational Management and Strategy, 2(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v2i2.241
Rao, P. (2017). The characteristics of effective writing skills in English language teaching. 2, 75–86.
Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388
Rosyada, A., & Sundari, H. (2021). Learning from home environment: Academic writing course for EFL undergraduates through Google Classroom application. Studies in English Language and Education, 8, 710–725. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18374
Sartika, D., Khairinisaak, K., & Asmara, R. (2022). The analysis of students’ difficulties in writing recount text. Journal of English Education Program, 3(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v3i1.50496
Silalahi, N. S., & Siregar, M. (2021). The implementation of genre-based approach in teaching writing text for tenth grade at SMA Yayasan Pendidikan Mulia. REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v10i1.24670
Taufiqullah, T., Fahdly, F. Z., Rosdiana, I., Ferrer, C. N., & Ratsamemonthon, C. (2025). Comprehensive review of writing assessments in EFL contexts: A meta-synthetic study. International Journal of Language Testing, 15(1), 193–213.
Tayyebi, M., Abbasabady, M. M., & Abbassian, G.-R. (2022). Examining classroom writing assessment literacy: A focus on in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00161-w
Tiwari, H. P. (2023). Use of Jacobs ESL Composition Profile to evaluate university students’ writing. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i2.51632
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.70725/307718pkpjuu
Ulbricht, J., Schachner, M. K., Civitillo, S., & Juang, L. (2024). Fostering culturally responsive teaching through the Identity Project intervention: A qualitative quasi-experiment with pre-service teachers. Identity, 24(4), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2361890
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1261955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Yunus, A. A., & Syafi’i, A. (2020). Google Classroom as learning platform in teaching writing. British: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 9(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.31314/british.9.1.48-64.2020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pratiwi Indah Sulistiyowati, Djatmika Djatmika, Ngadiso Ngadiso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
