Developing a Scamper-Based Ideation Model to Support Prewriting in Senior High School Students’ Short Story Writing

Authors

  • Gunawan Sandi Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Eli Marlina Harahap Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Nikmah Sari Hasibuan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Nur Afifah Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Devinna Riskiana Aritonang Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Sumaiyah Menjamin Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i4.19930

Keywords:

SCAMPER, Writing ideation, Short story writing, Senior high school students, Muhammadiyah school

Abstract

Senior high school students often experience difficulties at the prewriting stage of short story writing, particularly in developing focused themes, meaningful conflict, and coherent plot organization. These difficulties are important because underdeveloped ideas can limit narrative progression, weaken conflict development, and result in poorly connected events in the final short story. This study aimed to develop a SCAMPER-based ideation model for short story writing and examine its validity, practicality, and effectiveness. A research and development approach using the 4D model (define, design, develop, and disseminate) was implemented in the odd semester of 2025 at SMA Muhammadiyah 11 Padangsidimpuan with 37 students (Grade X = 11, Grade XI = 10, Grade XII = 16). The developed package consisted of SCAMPER cards, a one-page SCAMPER Sprint worksheet, an ideation rubric, a short story rubric, and a peer-feedback sheet. Product validity ranged from high to very high, with combined mean scores of 3.29 for the SCAMPER cards, 3.36 for the worksheet, 3.50 for the ideation rubric, 3.08 for the short story rubric, and 3.30 for the peer-feedback sheet. Practicality mean scores were 3.31 for students and 3.50 for teachers. Students’ ideation scores increased from the pretest (M = 8.19, SD = 1.31) to the posttest (M = 12.46, SD = 1.28), with a mean gain of 4.27, t(36) = 14.15, p < .001, and Cohen’s dz = 2.33. The mean final short story score was 17.89 (SD = 1.68), with strong inter-rater agreement for the total score (r = 0.83). Within the context of this study, the findings indicate that the developed package was valid and practical and was accompanied by significant improvement in students’ ideation performance. Its main contribution is a structured prewriting routine that integrates idea generation, idea selection, conflict development, plot planning, peer feedback, and assessment before students draft a complete short story.

Author Biographies

Gunawan Sandi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Study Program of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Eli Marlina Harahap, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Study Program of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Nikmah Sari Hasibuan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Study Program of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Nur Afifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Study Program of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Devinna Riskiana Aritonang, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Study Program of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

Sumaiyah Menjamin, Prince of Songkla University

Malay Language Study Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani, Thailand

References

Alemu, M. (2020). The Role of Pre-writing Strategies to Enhance the Students ’ Idea Generating Abilities : The Case of First-Year Computer Science Students of Haramaya University. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 8(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.1p.40

Alhamdi, S. A. (2021). The Effect of Social Constructivist SCAMPER Model on Creative Writing Skill. International Journal of Linguistics, 13(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v13i1.17881

Boonpracha, J. (2023). SCAMPER for creativity of students’ creative idea creation in product design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101282

Bulqiyah, S., Arif, M., & Ayu, D. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing : Tertiary students ’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.2371

Dewangga, V., Pramudita, R. F., Rukiati, E., & Tornado, G. (2026). Students ’ Perception of the SCAMPER Technique on Creative Writing Skill : A Case Study of an ESP Class. JEAPCO, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v12i1.6035

Fitria, N., Zahra, C. M., Usman, M., & Usman, B. (2021). Exploring Strategies To Foster Cohesion And Coherence In Efl Writing: A Focus On Simple View Of Writing. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora Kodepena, 5(1), 62–73. http://jsk.kodepena.org/index.php/jsk

Gallagher, K. (2011). Write Like This: Teaching Real-World Writing Through Modeling and Mentor Texts (1st editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032683263

Gallagher, K. (2023). Teaching adolescent writers. Routledge.

Gani, R., Supratmi, N., Ernawati, T., & Wijaya, H. (2024). Mengembangkan Bakat Menulis Siswa, Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Cerpen, Serta Menumbuhkan Minat Baca Dan Tulis. Lamahu, 3(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.37905/ljpmt.v3i2.24904

Graham, S., Cao, Y., Kim, Y.-S. G., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2025). Effective writing instruction for students ingrades 6 to 12: a best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 38(4), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2

Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & Mackay, M. (2020). The Effects of Writing on Learning in Science , Social Studies , and Mathematics : A Meta-Analysis. Sage Journals, 90(2), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744

Hassan, S. M. (2023). SCAMPER as a Creative Idea Generation Method : Case Study on Graphic Design Students. Information Sciences Letters, 12(4), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/isl/120453

Husniati, W. O., Dinar, S. S., Tike, L., & Rifa’ie, M. (2025). Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Munlis Cerpen Kelas IX. Jurnal Bastra, 10(4), 1778–1788. https://bastra.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal%0AFAKTOR

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). A Practical Guide to Instrument Development and Score Validation in the Social Sciences: The MEASURE Approach. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7275/svg4-e671

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pitrianti, S., & Gasanti, R. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Siswa SMA Terbuka. Literasi, 4(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v4i2.4283

Pulungan, A. A., & Siregar, M. A. F. (2023). Fenomena deiksis dan kesantunan dalam bahasa Batak Angkola-Mandailing. Hasta Wiyata, 6(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.hastawiyata.2023.006.02.01

Rahayu, K. D., Novitasari, D. A., & Mirantika, R. (2020). S tudents ’ Collaborative Writing Method in Pre-Writing Phase. IDEAS, 8(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1615

Ramírez, B. N., Cansino, M. L. R., Campos, C. A., Borrego, D. D., & Garza, L. H. (2024). Creative Writing : Story-Based Learning in Public and Private High School for Exploration of Written Text. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121392

Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022). Structure and coherence as challenges in composition : A study of assessing less proficient EFL writers ’ text quality. Assessing Writing, 54(January), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672

Tampubolon, M. L. V., & Sipahutar, H. (2024). Development of project-based modules to improve learning outcomes , critical thinking and problem-solving skills. JPBI, 10(2), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32958 ©

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). nstructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. University of Minnesota. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED090725

UNESCO. (2025). Literacy. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/literacy/

Woo, D. J., Wang, Y., Susanto, H., & Guo, K. (2023). Understanding English as a Foreign Language Students’ Idea Generation Strategies for Creative Writing With Natural Language Generation Tools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(7), 1464–1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231175999

Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing Performance and Learning of Secondary School Students. Sage Journals, 58(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266

Yudistia, A. Y., & Chandra, O. (2025). Effectiveness of augmented reality learning media in enhancing embedded system programming competence : A 4D development study. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 9(2), 1384–1397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2243 7/irje.v9i02.46911

Yüzüak, A. V., & Recepkethüda, R. (2025). The effect of SCAMPER activities on 7th grade students’ creative thinking, science achievement and perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2575910

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12

How to Cite

Sandi, G., Harahap, E. M., Hasibuan, N. S., Afifah, N., Aritonang, D. R., & Sumaiyah Menjamin. (2026). Developing a Scamper-Based Ideation Model to Support Prewriting in Senior High School Students’ Short Story Writing. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 14(4), 1162–1176. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i4.19930

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check