Depicting Life Through Conceptual Metaphor: an Art-Linguistic Analysis of Students’ Works in an Aesthetics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i3.18561Keywords:
Art education, Cognitive linguistics, Critical discourse studies, Conceptual metaphor, Multimodal analysisAbstract
Metaphor is recognized in cognitive linguistics as a mechanism through which individuals conceptualize abstract experiences in concrete terms. While extensive research has examined metaphor in verbal discourse, comparatively less attention has been given to how conceptual metaphors work in students’ visual artworks, particularly within an aesthetics course, which is a mandatory university subject for all regular students. Investigating conceptual metaphors of ‘life’ in student artworks is valuable because it reveals how cognitive processes, disciplinary backgrounds, and multimodal resources interact in meaning-making practices. This study probes how students use visual metaphors in the aesthetics subject. Data collected from artworks, titles, essays, interviews, and discussions were analyzed; the analysis was conducted in two stages: CMT (Conceptual Metaphor Theory) was used to identify source–target mappings underlying students’ metaphors (e.g., Life is a Ladder, Life is a Reflection); MDA (Multimodal Discourse Analysis)was applied to examine how visual elements such as composition, colour, material choice, and spatial arrangement reinforced and expanded metaphorical meanings. The findings reveal a clear disciplinary pattern: students from scientific backgrounds tend to construct structured, linear metaphors, whereas students from social sciences and humanities produce more layered, abstract, and narrative-driven metaphors. This indicates the multiple cognitive structures of metaphor as an art form and their societal settings. These findings contribute to art education by demonstrating how metaphor-based pedagogy fosters reflective thinking, interdisciplinary awareness, and multimodal literacy. Moreover, the study provides empirical evidence that meaning-making of ‘life’ in art classrooms emerges through the interaction of cognitive mapping and semiotic resources.
References
Abdulaal, M. A. A.-D., Abuslema, N. F. M. A., Hal, A. Z. M., Amer, A. A., & Altohami, W. M. A. (2023). A multimodal investigation of EFL upper-intermediate learners’ conceptual metaphors of language learning with some psychological implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01546-9
Asare, S., Walden, P., Aniagyei, E., & Emmanuel, M. K. (2023). A comparative study of traditional art techniques versus digital art techniques in the context of college visual art education. American Journal of Arts Social and Humanity Studies, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajashs.1556
Baalen, S. van, & Boon, M. (2024). Understanding disciplinary perspectives: A framework to develop skills for interdisciplinary research collaborations of medical experts and engineers. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1000. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05913-1
Benczes, R., & Ságvári, B. (2018). Life is a battlefield: Conceptualizations of life among Hungarian adults. Society and Economy, 40(4), 571. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2018.40.4.6
Botsis, H., & Bradbury, J. (2018). Metaphorical sense-making: Visual-narrative language portraits of South African students. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15, 412. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1430735
Charteris-Black, J. (2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9
Deacon, S. A. (2000). Creativity within qualitative research on families: New ideas for old methods. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2000.2077
Faigley, L., Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. College Composition and Communication, 54(2), 318. https://doi.org/10.2307/1512155
Gualberto, C. L., Santos, Z. B. dos, & Meira, A. C. G. A. de. (2020). Multimodal metaphors: From language as a condition to text to the notion of texture as a meaning-making semiotic resource. Revista de Estudos Da Linguagem, 28(2), 893–915. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.893-915
Guerrieri, A., Ervas, F., & Gola, E. (2023). Multimodal artistic metaphors: Research on a corpus of Sardinian art. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146639
Han, Y., Peng, Z., & Chen, H. (2022). Bibliometric assessment of world scholars’ international publications related to conceptual metaphor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1071121
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0
Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
Kövecses, Z., & Benczes, R. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction.
Kress, G. (2009). Assessment in the perspective of a social semiotic theory of multimodal teaching and learning. In Multimodal education (p. 19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_2
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
Lähdesmäki, T., Baranova, J., Ylönen, S. C., Koistinen, A.-K., Mäkinen, K., Juškienė, V., & Zaleskienė, I. (2021). Multimodality: Art as a meaning-making process. In Springer eBooks (p. 31). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89236-4_3
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lei, X. G., & Zhang, W. (2024). The application of multimodal metaphors in senior high school English argumentative writing class. SHS Web of Conferences, 199, 1013. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419901013
Li, Z., Shi, Y., & Lei, L. (2025). Metaphor as a springboard to scientific communication: A large-scale study of the use of lexical metaphors across disciplines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05677-z
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2013). The impact of cross-curricular competences and prior knowledge on learning outcomes. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p214
Ortiz, A., & Rojo, A. M. (2021). The pedagogical potential of visual metaphor in the multilingual classroom. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(5), 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.1937616
Paltridge, B., & Hyland, K. (2011). Continuum companion to discourse analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Parsons, M. (2010). Interpreting art through metaphors. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(3), 228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01621.x
Peffer, M., & Renken, M. (2016). Practical strategies for collaboration across discipline-based education research and the learning sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0252
Riley, H. (2023). The drive to draw: Perceptual attention and communicative intention. Leonardo, 56(5), 501. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02405
Schnall, S. (2013). Are there basic metaphors? In American Psychological Association eBooks (p. 225). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-010
Shipe, B. (2018). Facilitating productive encounters with difference: A visual essay. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/jcrae.4879
Sirait, A. (2021). Conceptualizing and schematizing heart metaphors through a cognitive semantic approach. Sapientia Humana: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 1(02), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.26593/JSH.V2I01.5365
Sirait, A., Seva, K., Lingga, R., & T. (2020). Conceptualizing coronavirus metaphor in media headlines: A cognitive semantic approach. English Journal Literacy Utama. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol5.iss2.2020.2655.4585
Smith, J. (2017). Necessary abuse: The mirror as metaphor in the sixteenth century. Necessary Abuse: The Mirror as Metaphor in the Sixteenth Century, 4, 1. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/necessary-abuse-the-mirror-as-metaphor-in-the-sixteenth-century
Stanič, D. (2023). Metaphorical conceptualization of positive and negative emotions in Italian. Journal for Foreign Languages, 15(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.15.21-43
Tay, D. (2022). Metaphor in psychotherapy: Functions, limitations, and implications. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 35(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1897783
Thibodeau, P. H., Matlock, T., & Flusberg, S. J. (2019). The role of metaphor in communication and thought. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12327
Velasco, I., & Sans, N. (2023). Art, cognition, and metaphor in education: A multimodal approach to creative thinking. International Journal of Education through Art, 19(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00067_1
Xia, Z., Zheng, Y., & Zhao, X. (2023). Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121
Yan, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, X. (2024). Metaphorical conceptualizations of generative artificial intelligence use by Chinese university EFL learners. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1430494
Ye, C., & Sangiamvibool, A. (2025). Human versus hybrid creation: A comparative study on AIGC assisted oil painting in art education. Perinatal Journal, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.57239/prn.25.0333001
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Yıldırım, A., Demirtaş, T., & Sevim, S. (2023). Examining metaphorical perceptions of preservice teachers from different departments on the concept of art. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(2), 315. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buefad/issue/81406/1326199
Zhang, X., Cob, S. A. C., & Liu, C. (2024). Mapping the intellectual structure of metaphor research in visual communication: A bibliometric analysis. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i9.2995
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kristining Seva, Ignatius Bambang Sugiharto, Asnita Sirait, Anniek Orye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
