Reimagining Physics Education: Addressing Student Engagement, Curriculum Reform, and Technology Integration for Learning
Abstract
Physics education is essential for fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking, yet it faces persistent challenges, including declining student engagement, curriculum irrelevance, and the complexities of integrating technology. This study adopts a literature review method, analyzing peer-reviewed studies published in the last five years, sourced from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using keywords like “physics education,” “student engagement,” and “curriculum reform.” The findings highlight that the abstract nature of physics, traditional lecture-based methods, and a lack of real-world applications contribute to reduced student interest. Addressing these issues requires the adoption of interactive, inquiry-based pedagogies and the development of contextualized curricula that align with contemporary societal challenges. Technology integration, including simulations and virtual experiments, enhances engagement but faces obstacles such as resource disparities and insufficient teacher training. Teacher preparedness remains pivotal, emphasizing professional development programs that enhance subject expertise, pedagogical skills, and technological proficiency. Additionally, educational reforms often face implementation challenges due to exam-centric systems and misalignment with classroom practices. This review advocates for a holistic approach, combining curriculum reforms, balanced technology use, and sustained investment in teacher development to revitalize physics education. By addressing these interconnected issues, physics education can become more engaging and relevant, equipping students with critical skills to navigate a technology-driven world. This work provides a foundation for future research and policy initiatives aimed at fostering inclusive and impactful physics education practices.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abed, S. (2024). Impact of new media on the reform of physical education teaching in faculty. Sustainability and Sports Science Journal, 2(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.61486/mjei4480
Agyei, E., Jita, T., & Jita, L. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of simulation-based lessons in improving the teaching of high school physics: Ghanaian preservice teachers’ experiences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 816–832. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.816
Alabi, A. (2023). Effects of computer simulation on students’ performance and retention in kinetic theory of gas and gas laws. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3422193/v1
Alsharif, A. (2022). Effect of using virtual lab simulations on students’ learning in online general physics courses. International Journal of Education, 14(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i3.19931
Alvita, D. (2023). Description of student attitudes in physics subjects towards reading interest. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 4(4), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.758
Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D., Sumaryanti, S., Perdana, R., & Susbiyanto, S. (2019). Description of relationship between students' interests and attitudes in physics subjects in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i3.9309
Azzouzi, A. (2023). Exploring the evolution of student interest: Investigation of the scientific aspects of learning physics towards renewable energy. E3S Web of Conferences, 412, 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201001
Breganha, M., Lopes, B., & Costa, N. (2018). Using students’ voice towards quality improvement of Angolan secondary physics classes. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.289
Candido, K., Gillesania, K., Mercado, J., & Reales, J. (2022). Interactive simulation on modern physics: A systematic review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 3(8), 1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.08.08
Castro, R. (2023). Factors affecting the individual interest of secondary school students in natural science lessons. Migration Letters, 20(S2), 1008–1017. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20is2.4140
Coffie, I., Frempong, B., Asare, I., Appiah, E., & Taylor, I. (2019). Exploring the use of technology in teaching physics at senior high schools in the Cape Coast metropolis of Ghana. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i8/aug19043
Dewi, A. (2021). Curriculum reform in the decentralization of education in Indonesia: Effect on students’ achievements. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33821
Dunst, C., & Bruder, M. (2013). Preservice professional preparation and teachers’ self-efficacy appraisals of natural environment and inclusion practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413505873
Elizondo-García, M. (2023). Breaking boundaries. Ascilite Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.526
Gordienko, T., Svyatokho, Y., & Ilchencko, L. (2020). Students' research activities as an element of the life safety basics school course. E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 22022. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021022022
Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M., Abdullah, B., … & Farizan, N. (2023). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039
Hamamous, A., & Benjelloun, N. (2022). Impact of the use of the Physics Crocodile Simulator in the teaching and learning of electricity in high school (Morocco). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(10), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.10.1711
Hu, A., & Huang, L. (2019). Teachers’ professional development and an open classroom climate. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 3(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2871
Jing, Y. (2023). The role of integrating artificial intelligence and virtual simulation technologies in physics teaching. Advances in Education Humanities and Social Science Research, 6(1), 572. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.6.1.572.2023
Kaloka, P., Nopembri, S., & Yudanto, Y. (2023). Nonlinear learning pedagogy: Does it have an impact on physical education in elementary schools? Retos, 48, 1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v48.97760
Kinzie, J. (2023). Tracking student (dis)engagement through the pandemic: What colleges & universities can do to foster an engagement reset. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss132559
Knackstedt, K., Leko, M., & Siuty, M. (2017). The effects of secondary special education preparation in reading: Research to inform state policy in a new era. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417700960
Kurniawan, A. (2023). Reasons for students’ interest in learning physics subjects in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.09208
Liu, T., Wilczyńska, D., Lipowski, M., & Zhen, Z. (2021). Optimization of a sports activity development model using artificial intelligence under new curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179049
Martinuk, M., Moll, R., & Kotlicki, A. (2010). Teaching introductory physics with an environmental focus. The Physics Teacher, 48(6), 413–415. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3479725
Novita, R. (2023). Physics e-book with augmented reality to improve students’ interest in physics. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i1.52764
Nurazmi, & Marisda, D. (2022). High school students' interest in choosing physics as a major in college. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i12.11540
O'Sullivan, M., Moody, B., Parker, M., & Carey, M. (2021). A three-legged stool: Teachers’ views of junior cycle physical education curriculum change. European Physical Education Review, 28(2), 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x211053811
Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2008). Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.4.010110
Pratidhina, E. (2024). Designing modeling-based physics online learning assisted with home-lab-kit. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15634
Rafiepour, A., & Farsani, D. (2021). Cultural historical analysis of Iranian school mathematics curriculum: The role of computational thinking. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.14296.411-426
Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., & Alam, F. (2021). Teaching physics with interactive computer simulation at secondary level. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 14(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.n1.127-141
Saeed, N., Shah, R., & Khan, I. (2023). A qualitative inquiry into the role and issues of physical education in primary schools: Perspectives of primary school teachers. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (SJESR), 6(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol6-iss1-2023(61-67)
Sharifov, G. (2024). Enhancing lyceum physics education with Lab Disc technology: A comparative study. Physics Education, 59(4), 045025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad4b85
Sontay, G., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2023). Physics teachers' opinions on Algodoo training. Journal of Science Learning, 6(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i1.49285
Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2019). Curriculum coherence as perceived by district-level stakeholders in large-scale national curriculum reform in Finland. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1607512
Tao, G. (2023). Systematic integration of information big data and physics teaching based on deep learning algorithms. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01044
Taşlıdere, E. (2020). Factors affecting 12th-grade students' physics achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1385–1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22415
White, S., & Tyler, J. (2015). Who's teaching what in high school physics? The Physics Teacher, 53(3), 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4908083
Wu, C. (2024). Research on the influence of PE teaching reform based on behavioral psychology on college students' mental health. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 3427–3432. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.3377
Yan, C. (2014). ‘We can’t change much unless the exams change’: Teachers’ dilemmas in the curriculum reform in China. Improving Schools, 18(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214553744
Yanti, V., Suliyanah, S., Safitri, N., & Deta, U. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of cross-interest physics subject for non-mathematics and natural sciences students at senior high school. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.22
Yao, T. (2023). Lack of interest cultivation: The impact of exam-oriented education on Chinese school physical education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i4/19562
Zhang, J., Cabrera, J., Niu, C., Zippay, C., & Dietrich, S. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceived preparedness in clinically oriented and traditional teacher preparation programs. Journal of Education, 203(3), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211053581
Zhu, X., Ennis, C., & Chen, A. (2011). Implementation challenges for a constructivist physical education curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408981003712802
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14058
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0