Content Structure Analysis of Merdeka Curriculum on Chemical Equilibrium Topic in F Phase

Siti Sarah, Faizah Qurrata Aini, Zonalia Fitriza

Abstract


The implementation of the merdeka curriculum as an improvement and replacement for the previous curriculum needs to be studied on the structure and depth of its learning content. This study aims to describe the suitability of the content structure of chemical equilibrium material based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and university textbooks as standards. The research method used is descriptive qualitative to describe the object according to the data and information obtained. The research design uses the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) by Reinders Duit which focuses on Content Structure Analysis. The data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman model by collecting, reducing, presenting, and concluding data. There are research instruments: knowledge, skill, and attitude level analysis sheets, as well as content standard analysis of chemical equilibrium topic. The results of curriculum analysis show a deriving in operational verbs from the level of knowledge, skills, and attitudes based on the Pancasila profile. For content analysis, it is found that the depth and breadth of chemical equilibrium learning materials from the Cambridge book grade XI of the Ministry of Education and Culture and the University textbook by Brady are consistent but the development of the material sequence is different. The sub-chapter on equilibrium constants Kc and Kp should be the prerequisite material before learning the concept of equilibrium shift.

Keywords


Merdeka curriculum, content structure analysis, model of educational reconstruction (MER), chemical equilibrium

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agusta, I. (2003). Teknik Pengumpulan dan Analisis Data Kualitatif.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2014). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom (I). Pustaka Pelajar.

Anggraheni, A. (2014). Implementasi Karakter Peduli Sosial dan Gotong Royong Dalam Komunitas di Rumah Susun (Rusun). 2013–2015.

Bahri, S. (2017). Pengembangan Kurikulum Dasar dan Tujuannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i1.61

Brady, J. E., & Jespersen, N. D. (2012). Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter (Sixth edit).

Duit, R., Gropengieber, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction – a Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2848.6720

Duit, R., & Tesch, M. (2010). On The Role of The Experiment in Science Teaching and Learning – Visions and The Reality of Instructional Practice. 17–30.

Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2019). DNA Sang Inovator, Diperbarui, dengan Kata Pengantar Baru: Menguasai Lima Keterampilan Inovator Disruptive.

Huda, N. (2017). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Al-Tanzim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v1i2.113

Indriani, A., Suryadharma, I. B., & Yahmin , Y. (2017). Identifikasi Kesulitan Peserta Didik dalam Memahami Kesetimbangan Kimia. J-PEK (JurnalPembelajaranKimia), 2(1), 9–13.

Jaspersen, Brady, & Hyslop. (2004). Chemistry the Molecular Nature of Matter (Issue 1).

Makbul, M. (2021). Metode Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian. 1996, 6.

Mulyasa. (2021). Menjadi Guru Penggerak Merdeka Belajar (L. I. Darojah (ed.)). PT. Bumi Aksara.

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252

Nissa, I. C. (2018). Mengukur Pengetahuan Konten Pedagogik Guru Matematika : Suatu Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Kependidikan, 4.

Nordine, J., Sorge, S., Delen, I., Evans, R., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Nilsson, P., Ropohl, M., & Stadler, M. (2021). Promoting Coherent Science Instruction Through Coherent Science Teacher Education: A Model Framework for Program Design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(8), 911–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1902631

Nurani, D., Anggraini, L., Misiyanto, & Mulia, K. R. (2022). Serba-Serbi Kurikulum Merdeka. Direktorat Sekolah Dasar Kemendikbud.

Retno Utari. (2011). Taksonomi Bloom. 1–13.

Ristiyani, E., & Bahriah, E. S. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa di SMAN X Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1),18.

Rosmana, P. S., Iskandar, S., Fauziah, H., Azzifah, N., & Khamelia, W. (2022). Kebebasan dalam Kurikulum Prototype. As-Sabiqun, 4(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v4i1.1683

Ruhaliah, Sudaryat, Y., Isnendes, R., & Hendrayana, D. (2020). Pelatihan Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran “Merdeka Belajar” Bagi Guru Bahasa Sunda Di Kota Sukabumi. Dimasatra: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 42–55.

Sappaile, B. I. (2007). Konsep Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(66), 379. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v13i66.356

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.

Sukaesih, S., Ridlo, S., & Saptono, S. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Calon Guru Biologi. Jurnal Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 46(1), 68–74. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LIK/article/view/11026/6830

Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. 4, 61–69.

Wu, M. Y. M., & Yezierski, E. J. (2019). Total Iron Measurement in Human Serum with a Smartphone. Aiche Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings, 2019-Novem. https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x

Wulandari, R. S., & Hendriani, W. (2021). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Sekolah Inklusi di Indonesia (Suatu Pendekatan Systematic Review). Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i1.3152

Yusuf, A. M. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. UNP Press.

Zellatifanny, C. M., & Mudjiyanto, B. (2018). The Type of Descriptive Research in Communication Study. Jurnal Diakom, 1(2), 83–90.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i5.9066

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.