Cover Image

Implementation of Expository Learning Integrated with Active Students Learning Strategy to Improve Learning Outcomes in Stoichiometry

Ion Wijaya, Muchlis Muchlis, Ariwati Wahyu Mumpuni

Abstract


Stoichiometry material is often still considered difficult for students in learning chemistry, causing low learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the effect of integrating the Expository Learning with the Active Student Learning  on student learning outcomes in stoichiometry material in class X-4 SMA Negeri 1 Kediri. This research involved 36 students of class X-4 SMA Negeri 1 Kediri as research subjects. This research used classroom action research method with two cycles. The results showed an increase in the average learning outcomes of students. Before the research (T0), the average score was 65.33, categorized as low, with a learning completeness rate of 55.56%. In cycle 1 (T1), the average score increased to 80.56, classified as good, with a learning completeness rate of 75%. In cycle 2 (T2), the average score increased to 88.47, classified as very good, with a learning completeness rate of 88.89%. Based on these results, the integration of the expository learning with active student learning can be considered for use in students who have a low understanding of chemical concepts in order to improve their learning outcomes on stoichiometry material.

Keywords


classroom action research, expository learning, learning outcomes, stoichiometry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anitah, S. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran. Univeristas Terbuka.

Aqib, Z., Jaiyaroh, S., Diniati, E., & Khotimah, K. (2011). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas untuk Guru SMP, SMA, SMK. Yrama Widya.

Arikunto, S. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Effendy. (2008). A-Level Chemistry for Senior High School Students Based on 2007 Cambridge Curriculum Volume 1A. Bayumedia Publishing.

Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 29–35.

Heryadi, D., & Sundari, R. S. (2020). Expository Learning Model. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(1), 207–216.

Jannatu, N., Imah, N. ’, Dan, S., & Wardani, S. (2015). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berbantuan E-Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 9(2), 1566–1574.

Kean, A., & Middlecamp, C. (1985). Panduan Belajar Kimia Dasar. Gramedia.

Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ Misconceptions About Basic Chemical Ideas. Durham University.

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Nugrahaeni, A., Redhana, I. W., & Kartawan, I. M. A. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 1(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v1i1.12808

Putri, N. S., & Mahdian, L. (2019). Penerapan Model Problem Solving terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Stoikiometri. Journal of Chemistry and Education, 3(2), 55–63.

Sappaile, N. (2019). Hubungan Pemahaman Konsep Perbandingan dengan Hasil Belajar Kimia Materi Stoikiometri. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 10(2), 58–71.

Sastrawijaya, T. (1998). Proses Belajar Mengajar Kimia. Kanisius.

Smith, J. P., DiSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions Reconceived : A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302

Sudijono, A. (2008). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sukmawati, D., & Purbaningrum, E. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Ekspositori terhadap Kemampuan Berbicara Anak. Paud Teratai, 4(2), 1–6.

Sunaringtyas, K., Saputro, S., & Masykuri, M. (2015). Pengembangan Modul Kimia Berbasis Masalah pada Materi Konsep Mol Kelas X SMA/MA sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa, 4(2).

Symington, D., & Kirkwood, V. (1996). Lecturer Perceptions of Student Difficulties in A First-Year Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(4), 339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed073p339

Utami, B., Saputro, A. N. C., Mahardiani, L., Yamtinah, S., & Mulyani, B. (2009). Kimia Untuk SMA dan MA Kelas X Program Ilmu Alam. HaKa MJ.

Wahyuni, N. D., Bahar, A., & Handayani, D. (2017). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Kimia Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Think Talk Write. ALOTROP : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Kimia, 1(2), 144–147. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/alotropjurnal/article/view/3546.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i5.8700

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.