Validity of Student Worksheet Based on Scientific Literacy to Train Argumentation Skills on Buffer Solution

Maya Kumalasari, Suyono Suyono

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to produce student worksheet based on scientific literacy to train argumentation skills on buffer solution seen from content and construct validation. The research subject were high school students grade XI. This research is development research with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) which is limited to the development stage to find out the validation of student worksheet. The instrument used to obtain validity data (content and construct) is a validation sheet. The validity of the developed student worksheet is based on the assessment of three validators through expert judgment namely two chemistry lecturers and one chemistry teacher. Student worksheet based on scientific literay is declared the validity criteria if it gets a minimum assessment mode of 4 (valid) from a range of 1 to 5 on a Likert scale. The results showed that all components of the assessment both content validity (relevance) and construct validity (consistency) received an assessment mode of 4 with a valid category. So that the student worksheet based on scientific literacy was declared valid to train argumentation skills on buffer solution.


Keywords


student worksheet, scientific literacy, argumentation skills, buffer solution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afni, A. N., & Suyono. (2022). Kelayakan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 16-25.

Arryanto, Y., Sulawatty, A., Rahman, A., Artsanti, P., & Yohan. (2006). Strategi Pengembangan Ilmu Kimia Indonesia. Jakarta: RISTEK.

Asrofi, E. (2010). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri (PBI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis bagi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMKN 4 Malang. SEMNAS MIPA. Hal. 28–36.

Branch, Robert Maribe. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Spinger Science & Business Media

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 152-159.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAP into Argumentation:

Development in the Application of Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education.

Fadlika, R. H., Hernawati, D., & Meylani, V. (2022). Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas XI MIPA Pada Materi Sel. Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 9-18.

Handayani, N.N.L. (2015). Membangun Masyarakat Melek Sains Berkarakter Bangsa Melalui Pembelajaran. Proceedings Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA V, 364-368.

Hanri, C., Rosli, M. S., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Ismail, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2019). Scientific Argumentation Practice and Verbal Interaction in Chemistry Classroom Among 10th Grade Students. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 733-738.

Hasibuan, M. H. E., Harizon, Ngatijo, & Fuldiaratman. (2019). Efektifitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi di Kota Jambi. Talenta Conference Series: Science and Technology (ST), 2(2), 1-11.

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual Versus Group Argumentation: Student’s Performance in a Malaysian Context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109-124.

Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada Isu Sosiosainfik Konsumsi Genetically Modified Organism (GMO). JPPI 3(1), 51–59.

Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Berbasis Pola Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) Menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dan Diskusi pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 318-324.

Kusdiningsih, E. Z., Jalmo, T., & Agung, J. (2016). Penerapan LKPD Berbasis Kemampuan Argumentasi-SWH untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis dan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 6(2), 101-110.

Manz, E. (2015). Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590.

Mcneill, K. (2011). Elementary Students’ Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments Over The School Year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.

Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil Literasi Sains dan Model Pembelajaran dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223-228.

Muna, Aulia Nihayatul, & Rusmini. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 1(2), 159-171.

Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2011). Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach: Its application and development through the use of a Table of Specifications Methodology. American Evaluation Association, 7(3), 1-27.

Nieveen, N. (2010). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at Shanghai (PR China): The East China Normal University.

Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974-978.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Draft Science Famework. Paris: OECD

Pisa. (2015). Draft Science Framework. PISA OECD.

Probosari, Riezky Maya, Murni Ramli, Harmita, Meti Indrowati, dan Sajidan. (2016). Profil Keterampilan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS Pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29-33.

Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Roesminingsih & Susarno, L. H. (2016). Teori dan Praktek Pendidikan. Surabaya: Lembaga Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan.

Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56-66.

Sanubari, F., Yamtinah, S., & Redjeki, T. (2014). Penerapan metode pembelajaran tutor teman sebaya dilengkapi dengan media interaktif flash untuk meningkatkan minat dan prestasi belajar siswa kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Sukoharjo tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 pada materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(4), 145–154.

Suyono, & Hariyanto. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Westen, Drew & Robert R. (2003). Quantifying Construct Validity: Two Simple Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608-6018.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8635

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.