Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Laju Reaksi Dengan Multipel Representasi Berbasis Inkuiri

Pahriah Pahriah, Hendrawani Hendrawani

Abstract


This development aims to determine the characteristics and feasibility of multiple
inquiry-based representation modules in the reaction rate material through the
ADDIE stage (Analyze, Design, Development Implementation and Evaluation)
developed by Thiagarajan. This research and development was carried out until
the development stage with adjustments based on development needs. The
assessment instrument used to determine the feasibility of the module is a
questionnaire sheet. The module feasibility was assessed by 2 material experts, 1
media expert, 1 linguist, 1 colleague, 1 practitioner, and 10 students as subjects.
Students involved in this study came from chemistry education study programs
that had undergone basic chemistry courses through limited trials. The data on
the value of the grievances obtained are still in the form of qualitative data and
then processed into quantitative data. Quantitative data are analyzed for each
aspect of the assessment. The final score obtained is converted to the level of
product feasibility qualitatively with the guidelines according to the criteria of
the assessment category. The results of expert validation showed the average
percentage (a) of material experts was 84% with very feasible categories; (b)
media experts 90% with very decent categories; (c) linguists 97% with very
decent categories; (d) colleagues 79.6 categories worth%; (e) practitioners
86.4% are very decent categories. The average response of students to product
development results 89.5% with a very feasible category. This shows that the
modules developed are feasible to be used at the stage of large-scale trials.

Keywords


Teaching materials, Reaction Rate, Multiple Representations, Inquiry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cheng, M. & Gilbert, J.K. (2009).Toward a better utilization of diagrams in research into the

use of representative levels in chemical education. In: J.K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds).

Multiple Representations in Chemical Education: Models and Modeling in Science

Education. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 251-28.

Cracolice, M.S. (2009). Guided inquiry and learning cycle. Norbet J. Pienta, Melanie M.

Cooper, & Thomas J. Greenbowe (Eds), Chemist’s Guide to Effective Teaching Volume II

(page. 20−33). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Dewi, N.L. Dantes, N & Sadia, W. (2013).Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing

Terhadap Sikap Ilmiah dan Hasil Belajar IPA.e-Journal Program Pascasarjana

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar.(Volume 3 Tahun 2013).

Farida, I. (2012). Interkoneksi Multipel Level Representasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pada

Kesetimbangan Dalam Larutan Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Web.Program Studi

Pendidikan IPA Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung.

Effendy, (2008).Teori VSEPR (Kepolaran dan Gaya Antarmolekul) Edisi 3. Malang

Bayumedia.

Eilks, I., Moelering, M., & Valanides, N.(2007). Seventh-Grade Students Understanding of

ChemicalReactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study, Eurasia

Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol. 3, No. 4, Hal. 271-286.

Gilbert, J.K. & Treagust, D. (2009).Multiple Representations in Chemical Education: Models

and Modeling in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 251-283.

Johnstone, A.H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry - Logical or Psycological?,Chemistry

education: Research and Practice in Europe. Vol. 1. No.1, Hal 9-15.

Kirik, O.T & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative Learning Instruction For Conceptual Change In

The Concepts Of Chemical Kinetics. RSC. Pract, 2012, 13, 221–236.

Perna , J. & Aksela, M. (2008).Concept Maps as Meaningful Learning Tools in A Web–

Based Chemistry material, Concept Mapping: Connecting EducatorsProc. of the Third

Int.Conference on Concept Mapping.

Riduwan. (2013). Skala Pengukuran Vaiabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rizal, Muhammad. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Multi

Representasi terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA Mahasiswa

SMP.Jurnal Pendidikan Sains. Vol. 2 No.3, 159-165.

Sa’adah, Effendy & Ibnu, S. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing

Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Materi Bentuk Molekul. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajarannya (SNKP).27 November 2016 Aula FMIPA

Universitas Negeri Malang.

Suhandi, A & Wibowo, F.C. (2012).Pendekatan Multirepresentasi Dalam Pembelajaran

Usaha-Energi dan Dampak Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa.Jurnal Pendidikan

Fisika Indonesia. Vol. 8, No.1, 1-7.

Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into Practice: Visualisation of the Molecular

World Using Animations, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2,

Hal.141-159.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M.I. (1974). Instructional Development for

Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington.

Trout, L., Lee C., Moog, R., & Rickey D., (2008). Inquiry Learning: What Is It? How Do

You Do It?. Dalam Bretz, S. L. (Ed.), Chemistry in The National Science Education

Standards: Model forMeaningful Learning in The High School Chemistry Classroom

Second Edition (hlm. 29-43). Washington: American Chemical Society.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1598

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.