PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING BERBANTUAN SIMULASI KOMPUTER TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATERI KESETIMBANGAN KIMIA

Leny Fitriah

Abstract


This research uses factorial design 2 x 2. The sample in this research is the
students of IKIP Kimia Mataram Chemistry study program that follow the
Basic Chemistry 2 course in the even semester of academic year 2013/2014
with 2 homogenously distributed classes. The sample was taken by cluster
random sampling technique. One class consists of 21 students who were
taught inquiry led by using computer simulation and other class consists of 22
students with guided Inquiry. The research data are low learning result and
high level learning result on chemical equilibrium material measured by using
test instrument choice and essay test with content validation each 80,6% and
91,7%. The measurement of the reliability of questions was obtained from
Cronbach's Alpha formula with a value of 0.73 for multiple choice tests and
0.914 for the essay test. Data analysis using ANOVA Two Ways test. The
result of the research shows that: (1) Low learning result of under guided
class students in using computer simulation is higher than guided inquiry
class without computer simulation; (2) Higher student learning result in
guided inquiry class using computer simulation higher than guided inquiry
class without computer simulation. So it can be concluded that guided inquiry
learning using computer learning can student improve learning outcomes in
chemical equilibrium material.

Keywords


Guided Inquiry, Computer Simulation, Learning Outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. 2008. The Effects of Inquiry-Based Computer Simulation With

Cooperative Learning on Scientific Thinking Conceptual Understanding of Gas Laws.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4):387-398.

Bergquist, W., & Heikkinen, H. 1990. Student Ideas Regarding Chemical Equilibrium: What

Written Test Answers Do Not Reveal. Journal of Chemical Education, 67 (1000).

Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F & Mocerino, M. 2007. The Development of two-tier

multiple-choice diagnostic instrumen for evaluating secondary school students’ ability

to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation.

Chemistry Education Research and Practise, 8 (3):293-307.

Driel, J.H., & Graber, W. 2002.”The Teaching and Learningof Chemical

Equilibrium”.Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, 271−292.

Effendy. 2002. Upaya untuk Mengurangi Kesalahan Konsep dalam Pengajaran Kimia dengan

Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Media Komunikasi Kimia, 2(6):1-20.

Gil, V. M. S., & Paiva, J. C. M. 2006. Using Computer Simulations To Teach Salt Solubility.

The Role of Entropy in Solubility Equilibrium, J. Chem. Educ. 83, 170–172.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. 2002. The Particulate Nature of Matter: Challenges in

Understanding the Submicroscopic World. In Gilbert, J.K et al (Eds), Chemical

Education: Towards Research-Based Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Publishers.

Jones, L. L. 1988. Enhancing Instruction in The Practice of Chemistry With The Computerassisted

Interactive Videodisc, Trends Anal. Chem. 7, 273–276.

Martin J. S. 2002. SIRs: Simulations and Interactive Resources for Windows, J. Chem. Educ.

, 639.

Nurrenbern, S. C., & Robinson, W. R. 1998. Conceptual Questions and Challenge Problems.

Journal of Chemical Education, 75(11):1502-1503.

Sawrey, B.A. 1990. Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Revisited. Journal of

Chemical Education, 67(3): 253-254.

Sentongo, J., Kyakulaga, R., & Kibirige, I. 2013. The Effect of Using Computer Simulations

in Teaching Chemical Bonding: Experiences with Ugandan Learners. Int. J. Edu. Sci,

(4):433-441.

Steffen, L. K., & Holt P. L. 1993. Computer Simulations of Chemical Kinetics (CS). J.

Chem. Educ. 70, 991–992.

Stieff, M. 2011. Improving Representational Competence using Molecular Simulations

Embedded in Inquiry Activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48

(10):1137-1158

Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. 2003. The Role of Sub-Microscopic

and Symbolic Representations in Chemical Explanations. International Journal of

Science Education, 25(11):1353-1368.

Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A.L. 2009. The Efficacy of An Alternative Instructional

Programme Designed to Enhance Secondary Students’ Competence In The Triplet

Relationship. In: Gilbert, J.K & Treagust, D. F (Eds). Multiple Representation in

Chemical Education: Model & Modeling in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.

pp:151-164

Tuan, H-L., Chin, C-C., Tsai, C-C., & Cheng, S-F. 2005. Investigating the Effectiveness of

Inquiry Instruction on The Motivation of Different Learning Styles Students.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3:541-566

Tuysuz, M., Ekiz, B., Bektas, O., Uzuntiryaki, E., Tarkin, A., & Kutucu, E.S. 2011. Pre-

Service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of Phase Changes and Dissolution At

Macroscopic, Symbolic, and Microskopic Levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral

Sciences, Vol 15.152-455.

Weerawardhana, A., & Ferry, B. 2006. Use of Visualization Software to Support

Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium: The Importance of Appropriate Teaching

Strategies. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Ascilite Conference: Who’s learning?

Whose technology? The University of Sydney.

Winberg, M. T., & Berg, C. A. R. 2007. Students’ Cognitive Focus During A Chemistry

Laboratory Exercise: Effects of A Computer-Simulated Prelab, J. Res. Sci. Teach.

(8):1108–1133.

Xie, D., & Tinker, R. 2006. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Chemical Reactions for Use

in Education. Journal of Chemical Education. Vol. 83 (1):54311-7001.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v5i2.1592

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.