DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICS LEARNING MATERIALS BASED ON GUIDED INQUIRY MODEL INTEGRATED WITH VIRTUAL LABORATORY TO FACILITATE STUDENT’S SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION ABILITY

Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, Wasis Wasis, Endang Susantini

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to develop physics learning materials based on guided inquiry model integrated with virtual laboratory to practice student’s scientific argumentation skill. This research uses 4D development model and tested in 91 students, divided into three classes, X MIPA 1, X MIPA 2, and X MIPA 3 SMA Senopati Sedati with try out design using one group pretest-posttest design. The learning instruments developed are: (a) syllabus (b) lesson plan, (c) student’s book, (d) student worksheet, and (e) test of students’ scientific argumentation skill. The Research data gotten through validation method, observation, test, and questionnaire. The research result was analyzed descriptively quantitative and qualitative. The students’ scientific argumentation skill was analyzed with n-gain. The research result gotten are (a) the learning instruments developed categorized as very valid, (b) the learning activity was well done, (c) the students’ scientific argumentation skill run into enhancement in middle categorized, and (d) the students responded very positively to the learning that is already implemented. Based on analysis result and discussion, it can be concluded that the physics learning material guided inquiry model integrated with virtual laboratory developed is worthy to be used to practice students’ scientific argumentation skill.

Keywords


guided inquiry model, virtual laboratory, student’s scientific argumentation skill

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acevedo, N. A. Van Dooren, W. Clarebout, G.Elen, J. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Representational flexibility in linear-function problems: a choice/no-choice study. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong and J. Elen (Eds.) Use or representations in reasoning and problem solving: Analysis and improvement,74-79. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

Aisyah, I. & Wasis. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Kalor di SMAN 1 Pacet. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF). Vol. 04 No. 02, pp. 83-87.

Akarsu, B., Bayram, K., Slisko, J., & Cruz, A.C. (2013). Understanding Elementary Students’ Argumentation Skills through Discrepant Event “Marbles in the Jar”. International Jour¬nal of Scientific Research in Education, 6(3), pp. 221-232.

Argandi, R., Martini, K. S., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2013). Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Metode Inquiry Terbimbing Dilengkapi Kegiatan Laboratorium Real & Virtual pada Pokok Bahasan Pemisahan Campuran”. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPK). Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 44-49.

Azis, A. & Yusuf, I. (2013). Aktivitas & Persepsi Peserta Didik dalam Implementasi Laboratorium Virtual pada Materi Fisika Modern di SMA. Berkala Fisika Indonesia. Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 37-42.

Bao, L. Fang, K. Cai, T. Wang, J. Yang, L. Cui, L. Han, J. Ding, L. & Luo, Y. (2009). Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison. American Journal of Physics.Vol.77 No.12, pp. 1118-1123.

Bekiroglu, F. O. & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of The Relationship Between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (2012) 10, pp. 1415-1443.

Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2010). Classroom Communities’ Adaptations of the Practice of Scientific Argumentation. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Science Education, 95, pp. 191 – 216.

Bottcher, F. & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework. Springer. (2011) 20, pp. 103-140.

Branch, J. & Oberg, D. (2004). Focus on inquiry a teacher guide to implementing inquiry based learning. Canada: Alberta Education, Alberta.

Bricker L. A. & Bell P. 2008. Conceptual of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implication for practices of science education. Science Education. 92(3), pp. 473-498.

Ch., I. F. & Gusniarti, W. F. (2014). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Koloid yang Dikembangkan Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Argumentatif. Edusains. Vol. VI No. 01, pp. 33-40.

Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). Students questions and discursive interaction: their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussion in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 883-908.

Conway, C. J. (2014). Effects of Guided Inquiry versus Lecture Instruction on Final Grade Distribution in a One-Semester Organic and Biochemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education. (2014) 91, pp. 480−483.

Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: a framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38, pp. 355–385.

Erduran, S., Simon., & Osborne, J. (2004). Taping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education. 88, pp. 915-933.

Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes. 32 (2/3), pp. 135 – 153.

Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., & Felton, M. (2013). The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Science Education, 97, pp. 497–523.

Hakyolu H. & Bekiroglu F. O. (2011). Assessment of Student’s Science Knowledge Levels and Their Involvement with Argumentation. International Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE). 2(1), pp. 264-269.

Handayani, P. & Sardianto, M. (2015). Analisis Argumentasi Peserta Didik Kelas X Sma Muhammadiyah 1 Palembang Dengan Menggunakan Model Argumentasi Toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika. Vol.2, No. 1, pp. 60-68.

Hohenshell, L. M. & Hand, B. (2006). Writing-to-learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: a mixed method study. Internationa Journal of Science Education. Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 849-871.

Ibrahim, M. (2002). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. Modul Disajikan pada Pelatihan Terintegrasi Berbasis Kompetensi Guru mata Pelajaran Biologi SLTP. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas.

Ishaq, M. (2007). Fisika Dasar Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Jaya, H. (2012). Pengembangan Laboratorium Virtual untuk Kegiatan Praktikum dan Memfasilitasi Pendidikan Karakter di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi. Vol 2 No. 1, pp. 81-90.

Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education. Sciemag. Vol. 340 (2013), pp. 306-308.

Kathchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Naaman, R. M. (2013). Argumentation in the chemistry laboratory: iquiry and confirmatory experiments. Research in Science Education. Vol. 43, pp. 317-345.

Konstantinidou, A. & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education. Springer. (2013) 22, pp.1069–1087.

Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Student reasoning about electricity: combining performance assesment with argumentation analysis. Internationa Journal of Science Education. Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 849-871.

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. England: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2010). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development. 79 (5), pp. 1310 – 1328.

Machtinger, E. T. (2014). Using a Combined Approach of Guided Inquiry & Direct Instruction to Explore How Physiology Affects Behavior. The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 76 No. 9, pp. 595–600.

Mahanta, A. & Sarma, K. K. (2012). Online Resource and ICT-Aided Virtual Laboratory Setup. International Journal of Computer Applications. Vol. 52 No. 6, pp. 44 – 48.

Martinez, G. L. F., Naranjo, A., Angel, L., Perez, Suero, M. L., & Pardo, P. J. (2011). Comparative Study of The Effectiveness of Three Learning Environments: Hyper-Realistic Virtual Simulations, Traditional Schematic Simulations and Traditional Laboratory” Physical Review Special Topics -Physics Education Research. Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 1-12.

Mercer, N. Dawes, L.Wegerif, R. & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British educational research journal. Vol.30 No.3, pp. 359-377.

Ngertini, N., Sadia, W., & Yudana, M. (2013). Pengaruh Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA PGRI 1 Amlapura. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Vol. 4 (2013), pp. 1-11.

Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T Plomp and N Nieveen (eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 89-101). Enschede: SLO, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Result: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume 1). PISA. OECD Publishing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.

Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Erduran, S. (2013). The nature of preservice science teachers argumentation in inquiry oriented laboratory context. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 35 No. 15, pp. 2559-2586.

Ratumanan, G. T. & Laurens. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classroom: social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 33 No. 8, pp. 839-858.

Riduwan. (2010). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sampson, V. & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. (2012), pp. 1-27.

Sampson, V. & Clark, D. B. (2011). A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups. Springer. (2011) 41, pp. 63–97.

Schen, M. S. (2007). Scientific Reasoning Skills Development in The Introductory Biology Courses for Undergraduates (Unpublished doctoral disertation). The Ohio State University.

Siswanto, Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 10 (2) (2014), pp. 104-116.

Squire, K., & Mingfong. (2007). Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Vol. 16 (1).

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supeno (2016). Model Pembelajaran Penyelesaian Masalah Argumentatif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Kognitif Produk, Ketrampilan Proses Sains, & Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMK (Disertasi Doktor Pendidikan tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Sutarto & Indrawati. (2010). Diktat Media Pembelajaran. Jember: Universitas Jember.

Ucar, S. & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting Guided Inquiry in Science Classes Using Authentic, Archived, Web-Based Data. Elsevier. (2011) 57, pp. 1571–1582.

Vieira, R. D., Bernardo, J. R. R., Evagorou, M., & de Melo, F. V. (2015). Argumentation in Science Teacher Education: The simulated jury as a resource for teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education. (2015), pp. 1-27.

Wasis. (2015). Hasil Pembelajaran Sains di Indonesia: Problem dan Upaya Mengatasinya. Surabaya: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains 2015 Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Yuniarti, F., Dewi, P., & Susanti, R. (2012). Pengembangan Virtual Laboratory Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer pada Materi Pembiakan Virus. Unnes Journal of Biology Education (UJBE). Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 27-35.

Yusuf, I. & Subaer. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Media Laboratorium Virtual pada Materi Dualisme Gelom¬bang Partikel di SMA Tut Wuri Handayani Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII). Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 189-194.

Yusuf, I., Widyaningsih, S. W., & Purwati, D. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Modern Berbasis Media Laboratorium Virtual Berdasarkan Paradigma Pembelajaran Abad 21 & Kurikulum 2013. Pancaran. Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 189-200.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v4i1.29

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.