Utilizing AI for Physics Problem Solving: A Literature Review and ChatGPT Experience

Hisbulloh Als Mustofa, Muhammad Roil Bilad, Nuraqilla Waidha Bintang Grendis

Abstract


The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in physics education is gaining traction, driven by their potential to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. This study aims to investigate the use of AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, in solving physics problems and enhancing educational practices. Utilizing a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, the research identifies current trends and practical applications of AI in physics education. The results indicate that AI tools effectively support lesson planning, introduce innovative teaching methodologies, and assist in solving complex physics problems, significantly enhancing problem-solving skills and personalized learning experiences. However, challenges such as inaccuracies in handling advanced content, the lack of useful visual aids, and the need for human intervention to ensure the completeness and accuracy of AI-generated content were noted. Personal experiences, supplemented by an interview with a thermodynamics lecturer, revealed that while ChatGPT can simplify complex concepts and improve comprehension, it could not replace the mentorship and nuanced feedback provided by human educators. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating AI tools into physics education, emphasizing the need for balanced integration with traditional teaching methods, improved AI literacy among educators and students, and future developments focusing on personalized learning and enhanced visualization capabilities. The findings demonstrate the transformative potential of AI in physics education and highlight the importance of addressing its limitations to maximize educational outcomes.


Keywords


Artificial intelligence; Physics problem-solving; ChatGPT; Literature review; Personal experience; Thermodynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007). Problem Solving Skill Evaluation Instrument—Validation Studies. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883, 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508681

Araújo, J. L., & Saúde, I. (2024). Can ChatGPT Enhance Chemistry Laboratory Teaching? Using Prompt Engineering to Enable AI in Generating Laboratory Activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1858–1864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00745

Bedolla, E., Padierna, L. C., & Castañeda-Priego, R. (2021). Machine learning for condensed matter physics. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 33(5), 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/abb895

Borisova, M., Hadzhikoleva, S., & Hadzhikolev, E. (2023). Use of Artificial Intelligence technologies in studying the phenomenon of electric current in physics education. 18, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.58503/icvl-v18y202318

Carrasquilla, J. (2020). Machine learning for quantum matter. Advances in Physics: X, 5(1), 1797528. https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528

Clark, T. M., Fhaner, M., Stoltzfus, M., & Queen, M. S. (2024). Using ChatGPT to Support Lesson Planning for the Historical Experiments of Thomson, Millikan, and Rutherford. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1992–1999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00200

Cui, S., Tseng, H., Pakela, J., Ten Haken, R. K., & El Naqa, I. (2020). Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists. Medical Physics, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14140

Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1

ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926

Eysenbach, G. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e46885. https://doi.org/10.2196/46885

Fahy, S., Niemann, M., Böhm, P., Winkler, T., & Oehme, S. (2024). Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Osteoarthritis. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(5), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14050495

Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Atlas, S. (2024). Generative AI and Marketing Education: What the Future Holds. Journal of Marketing Education, 46(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753231215436

Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in Education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52

Hutchison, A. (2024). Making Artificial Intelligence Your Friend, Not Your Foe, in the Literacy Classroom. The Reading Teacher, 77(6), 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2296

Kieser, F., Wulff, P., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2023). Educational data augmentation in physics education research using ChatGPT. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020150

Kucirkova, N., & Leaton Gray, S. (2023). Beyond Personalization: Embracing Democratic Learning Within Artificially Intelligent Systems. Educational Theory, 73(4), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12590

Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7

Mahligawati, F., Allanas, E., Butarbutar, M. H., & Nordin, N. A. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in Physics Education: A comprehensive literature review. 2596(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012080

Muther, T., Dahaghi, A. K., Syed, F. I., & Van Pham, V. (2023). Physical laws meet machine intelligence: Current developments and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(7), 6947–7013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10329-8

Piccione, A., Massa, A. A., Ruggiero, M. L., Serio, M., Rinaudo, M., Marocchi, D., & Marino, T. (2024). Training teachers on new topics and new tools in Physics education. 2693(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2693/1/012010

Rico, A. M. M., Regueiro, J. M. P., Garcia-Ortiz, C. E., Rabanales, E. G. A., Ontiveros, L. A. O., Lopez, O. O., & Tejeda, S. (2023). Similarities between human and artificial intelligence evaluations applied on engineering students on first-year kinematics learning through an argumentative item. 2023-May. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125171

Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887

Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019). Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. Npj Computational Materials, 5(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0

Song, N. (2024). Higher education crisis: Academic misconduct with generative AI. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), e12532. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12532

Thaler, J., Williams, M., & LaFleur, M. (2024). Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (IAIFI): Infusing physics intelligence into artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 45(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12150

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Tschisgale, P., Wulff, P., & Kubsch, M. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence-based methods into qualitative research in physics education research: A case for computational grounded theory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020123

Tyson, J. (2023). Shortcomings of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 3098–3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361

Wang, K. D., Burkholder, E., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., & Haber, N. (2023). Examining the potential and pitfalls of ChatGPT in science and engineering problem-solving. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330486

Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., & Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education: Generative AI, Chatbots, Analytics, and International Student Success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116716

Xu, Z., Fang, Q., Huang, Y., & Xie, M. (2024). The public attitude towards ChatGPT on reddit: A study based on unsupervised learning from sentiment analysis and topic modeling. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0302502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302502

Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024). The impact of AI in physics education: A comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. Physics Education, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1fa2

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhu, Y., & Yu, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) for quantum and quantum for AI. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 55(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-04914-6




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v12i1.11748

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.