PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR ANTARA GAYA BERPIKIR DIVERGEN DAN KONVERGEN MATA KULIAH GELOMBANG MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN FISIKA

Sukainil Ahzan, Syifa’ul Gummah

Abstract


This study aims to determine differences in student learning outcomes between divergent and convergent thinking styles. The sample of research is the fourth semester students in the Department of Physics Education IKIP Mataram. The experimental design uses a pre-test-post-test one-group design. The data analyzed is the result of cognitive learning and questionnaire of students' thinking character. The research hypothesis was tested by using t test statistic. The result of data analysis can be concluded that there is no difference between learning achievement with convergent and divergent thinking style.


Keywords


Thinking style, cognitive learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamolhodaei, Hassan. 2001. Convergent/Divergent Cognitive Styles and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, p.102-117,(Online), http://www.recsam.edu.my/R&D_Journals/YEAR2001/2001Vol24No2/102-117.pdf, diakses tanggal 10 juni 2011)

Arikunto, S. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. 2010. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Child D. and Smithers A., (1973), An attempted validation of the Joyce-Hudson scale of convergence and divergence, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, pp. 57-61.

Danili, E., & Reid, N. 2006. Cognitive factors that can potentially affect pupils’ test performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2006, 7 (2), 64-83. The Royal Society of Chemistry

De Bono, E. 1970. BerpikirLateral. Terjemahan oleh Sutoyo. 1991. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga

Guilford, J.P. 1959. Personality. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc.

Sons.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2009. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hyerle, D., & Williams, K. 10 Juni 2011. Bifocal Assessment in the Cognitive Age: Thinking Maps for Assessing Content Learning and Cognitive Processes. The New Hampshire Journalof Education, (Online),

http://www.thinkingfoundation.org/david/books/TMapsAssessJournal.pdf, diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2011)

Kharkhurin, A.V. 2009. The Role of Billingualism in Creative Performance on Divergent Thinking and Invented Alien Creatures Tests. Journal of Creative Behavior, Volume 43 Number 1 First Quarter 2009, P. 59-71

Khery, Y. 2012. Pengaruh Strategi Problem Based Learning pada Pembelajaran Kimia Bahan Alam Terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif, Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Divergen dan Konvergen. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang.

Kozhevnikov, M. 2007. Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin , Vol. 133, No. 3, p. 464–481. The American Psychological Association

Messick S., (1993), The matter of style: manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching, Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service.

Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., Fehm, H.L. & Born, J. 1999. EEG Complexity And Performance Measures Of Creative Thinking. Psychophysiology, 36(1999), p. 95–104

Stanley, C. 1995. Differences in Divergent Thinking as a Function of Handedness and Sex. The American Journal of Psychology. Urbana: Fall 1995. Vol. 108, Iss. 3, p. 311

Subali, B. 2009. Pengembangan Tes Pengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen Mata Pelajaran BiologiSMA. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Biologi, Lingkungan dan Pembelajarannya, Jurdik Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 4 Juli. Hal. 581-593




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v2i1.294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.