The Effect of the Inquiry Learning Model on Students’ Metacognition Awareness

Samsun Hidayat, Muhammad Asy'ari, Muhali Muhali, Roniati Sukaisih


This study aims to determine the effect of inquiry learning models on the students’ metacognition awareness in senior high school. Metacognition awareness in this study consists of eight components, namely (1) declarative knowledge, (2) procedural knowledge, (3) conditional knowledge, (4) planning, (5) information management system, (6) monitoring, (7) evaluation, and (8) debugging. This research is a quasi-experimental research with one group pretest-posttest design. The sample in this study were 25 students of science in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Lombok Tengah chosen using the saturated sample technique. Metacognition Awerness Inventory (MAI) is used to collect metacognition awareness data of students who are analyzed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon test samples. The results showed that students' metacognition awareness for all indicators was stated to increase (p <0.05) after learning using inquiry learning models. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the inquiry learning model influences the metacognition awareness of secondary school students.


Learning model; Inquiry; Metacognition awareness

Full Text:



Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach. Ninth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Artayasa, I P. Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The Effect of Three Levels of Inquiry on the Improvement of Science Concept Understanding of Elementary School Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235-248.

Asy'ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Model in Improving Prospective Teachers' Metacognition Knowledge and Metacognition Awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455-470.

Flavell, J. H. (1970). Cognitive changes in adulthood. In L. R. Goulet, P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Life-spam developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 247-253). New York: Academic Press.

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.

Hussain, A., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Physics Teaching Methods: Scientific Inquiry Vs Traditional Lecture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19), 269-276.

Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading. Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4

Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31-64). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kuhlthau & Todd. 2007. Guided Inquiry: A framework for learning through school librariesin 21st century schools. New Jersey: CISSL.

Louca, E. P. (2003). Metacognition and theory of mind. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9-30.

McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 79–102). Hoboken: Wiley.

Muhali. (2013). Analisis kemampuan metakognisi siswa pada mata pelajaran kimia SMA. Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia Hydrogen, 1(1), 1-7.

Niedringhaus, K. L. (2010). Teaching Better Research Skills by Teaching Metacognitive Ability. Winter/Spring, 18(2), 113-118.

Nur, M. (2011). Strategi-strategi Belajar. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Unesa.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). San Diego: Academic.

Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology, 7(4), 351-371.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 111-139.

Schraw, G., Olafson, L., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognitive Knowledge and Field-based Science Learning in an Outdoor Environmental Education Program. In A. Zohar & Y.J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education, Trends in Current Research,Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. (pp. 57-77). New York: Springer.

Suardana, I N., Redhana, I W., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Selamat, I N. (2018). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning Using Local Culture-Based 7E Learning Cycle Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 399-412.

Tosun, C. & Senocak, E. (2013). The effects of problem-based learning on metacognitive awareness and attitudes toward chemistry of prospective teachers with different academic backgrounds. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,38(3), 61-73.

Wenning, C.J. & Rebecca, E.W. (2006). A generic model for inquiry-oriented labs in postsecondary introductory physics. Journal of Physics Teacher Education, 3(3), 24-28.

Yuliati, L., Riantoni, C. & Mufti, N. (2018). Problem Solving Skills on Direct Current Electricity through Inquiry-Based Learning with PhET Simulations. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 123-138.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.