Email this article Development of 21st Century Skills-Based Stereochemistry Learning Tools to Train Students' Argumentation Skills
Abstract
This study aims to describe the validity of 21st century skills-based stereochemistry learning tools to train students' argumentation skills. This research is an educational design research with reference to the design of the Wademan development research model. The research instrument used was a learning tools validation sheet consisting of several validation sheets, namely: syllabus validation sheet, lesson plan validation sheet, teaching material validation sheet, student worksheet validation sheet, and argumentation skills assessment instrument validation sheet. The research data obtained from the validation and review sheets were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The expert's assessment of validation for each aspect of the assessment has good and very good validity criteria. These results indicate that learning tools that integrate the nature and complexity of the stereochemical structure of natural compounds from tropical rain forests can be used in the stereochemistry learning process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (ENGLISH)References
Adalikwu, S.A. & Iorkpilgh, I.T. (2013). The influence of instructional materials on academic perfomance of senior secondary school students in chemistry in cross river state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 12, 39-45. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v12i1.6
Ahmad, D. & Nur, H.K. (2015). Developing english lesson plans for the first students of SMA 18 Makassar based on the 2013 curriculum. ETERNAL (English, Teaching Learning, and Research Jounal), 1 (2), 187-200.
Alberida, H., Lufri, Festiyed, & Barlian, E. (2018). Problem Solving Model for Science Learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012084
Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Setin, P.S., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and students’s conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1303-1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1
Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G.M. (2005). It gets me to the product: How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1402-1407. DOI:10.1021/ed082p1402
Borich, G.D. (2003). Observation Skill for Effective Teaching. Fourth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Bulgren, J.A. & Ellis, J.D. (2012). Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes: Teaching and Learning with Toulmin. In M. S. Kwine (Eds.), Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research (pp. 135-154). Dordrecht; New York: Springer.
Cardoso, D.C., Cristiano, M.P. & Arent, C.O. (2009). Development of New Didactic Materials for Teaching Science and Biology: The Importance of the New Education Practices. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 9 (1), 1-5. ISSN 1608-4217.
Cartrette, D. P., & Dobberpuhl M. R. (2009). The concept inventory as a diagnostic of understanding and achievement in a year-long organic chemistry course. Chem. Educator, 14, 1–10.
Cartrette, D.P. & Mayo, P.M. (2011). Students’ understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2011, 12, 29–39. Doi: 10.1039/C1RP90005F
Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Jounal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(10), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
Cooper, M.M., Underwood, S.M., & Hilley, C.Z. (2012). Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties?. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 195–200. DOI: 10.1039/C2RP00010E
Demoin, D.W. & Jurisson, S.S. (2013). Chemical Kinetics Laboratory Discussion Worksheet. J. Chem. Educ. 90 (9), 1200–1202. doi:10.1021/ed400059f.
Dwyer Anne O’ & Childs Peter (2011). Second level irish pupils’ and teachers’ view of difficulties in organic chemistry. ebook-esera2011-Odwyer. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/
Duffy, A.M. (2006). Students’ ways of understanding aromaticity an electrophilic
aromatic substitution reactions. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8mb6v54x
Erduran S., Simon S. & Osborne J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. DOI 10.1002/sce.20012
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: a journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Ferguson, R. & Bodner, G. M. (2008). Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2008, 9, 102–113. 10.1039/B806225K
Fink, S.B. (2012). The Many Purposes of Course Syllabi: Which Are Essential and Useful. Syllabus, 1 (1), 1-12.
Garcia-Mila M., Gilabert S., Erduran S. & Felton M. (2013). The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse. Science Education, 97(4), 497–523. DOI 10.1002/sce.21057
Graulich, N. (2015). The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: how do students deal with the invisible? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00165F
Ilma, S. dan & Wijarini, F. (2017). Developing of Environmental Education Textbook Based on Local Potencies. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3 (3), 194-201. p-ISSN: 2442-3750; e-ISSN: 2527-6204.
Jim’enez-Aleixander, M.P., Rodri’guez, A.B., & Duschl, R.A. (2000). Doing the lesson or Doing science: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, John Wiley&Sons Inc. 758-792.
Jim’enez-Aleixandre M.P., & Erduran, Sibel. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jim’enez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp 3-28). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Kelly, G.J., & Takao, A.(2002). Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analysis of University Oceanography Students’Use of Evidence in Writing. Science education, 2002, Wiley Periodicals Inc. 314-342.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Buku Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. Direktorat jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2017). Panduan Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran dan Bahan Ajar. Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. Direktorat Pembelajaran.
Kereh, C.T., Liliasari, Tjiang, P.C. & Sabandar, J. (2015). Validitas dan Realibilitas Instrumen Tes Matematika Dasar yang Berkaitan dengan Pendahuluan Fisika Inti. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2 (1), 36-46.
Kibar, Z. B., & Ayas, A. (2010). Developing a worksheet about physical and chemical event. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.094
Kraft, A., Strickland, A.M., & Bhattacharyya, G. (2010). Reasonable reasoning: multi-variate problem-solving in organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2010, 11, 281–292. Doi: 10.1039/C0RP90003F
Kurnia, F., Rosana, D. & Supahar (2017). Developing Instruments using CIPP Evaluation Model in the Implementation of Portfolio Assessment in Science Learning. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12 (8), 1989-1998.
Ludy, M.J., Brackenbury, T., Folkins, J.Wm., Peet, S. H., Langendorfer, S.J., & Beining, K. (2016). Student Impressions of Syllabus Design: Engaging Versus Contractual Syllabus. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 1-23.
Muhtarom, Juniati, D. & Siswono, T.Y.E. (2017). Pengembangan Angket Keyakinan terhadap Pemecahan Masalah dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (1), 55-64.
Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslim, Suhandi, A. & Nugraha, M.G. (2017). Development of Reasoning Test Instruments Based on TIMSS Framework for Measuring Reasoning Ability of Senior High School Student on the Physics Concept. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 812 012108. MSCEIS. (pp.1-5). Bandung.
Nieveen, N., McKenney, S. & Van den Akker (2007). In Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., Van de Akker (Eds.). Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
Ningsih, F., Suratno., & Narulita, E. (2018). The Development of Student’s Book Based on STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) With LBL (Life Based Learning) Integration On The Subject of Biotechnology in Class XII Senior High School. Pancaran Pendidikan, 7 (3), 7-12.
Nuffield Practical Work for Learning: Argumentation. (2013). Argumentation and practical work – An introduction. Nuffield Foundation.
Pabuccu,A., Erduran, S. & Moncada, A. (2012). Argumentation in organic chemistry education. Strand 7 Discourse and argumentation in science education. esera.org.
Plomp, T. & Nieveen, N. (2013). Introduction to the Collection of Illustrative Cases of Educational Design Research. In Plomp, and Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research-Part B: Illustrative Cases. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Prasetiyo, N.A. & Perwiraningtyas, P. (2017). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Berbasis Lingkungan Hidup pada MataKuliah Biologi di Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3 (1), 19-27.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D.B. (2008). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions. Science Education, 2008, Wiley Periodicals Inc. 448-472.
Sekerci, A. R., & Canpolat, N. (2014). Impact of argumentation in the chemistry laboratory on conceptual comprehension of turkish students. Educational Process: International Journal, 3 (1-2), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2014.312.2
Supeno, Nur, M. dan Susantini, E. (2015). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Untuk Memfasilitasi Siswa Dalam Belajar Fisika Dan Berargumentasi Ilmiah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Jurusan Fisika FMIPA UM. (pp. 36-40). Malang.
Sari, B.P., Feranie, S. & Winarno, N. (2017). The Use of Conceptual Change Text toward Students’ Argumentation Skills in Learning Sound. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 895 012169, 1-5. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012169.
Susantini, E. (2009). The Development of Biology Material Resources by Metacognitive Strategy. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 16 (2), 88-93.
Susanti, L. B., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Taufikurohmah, T. (2018). Validity of worksheet-based guided inquiry and mind mapping for training students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012015
Taber, S.K. (2009). Learning at The Symbolic Level: In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education (pp. 75-106). Dordrecht: Springer.
Venville,G.J. & Dawson, V.M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(8), 952-977.
Walker, J. & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn in science: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(50),561-596.
Widodo, C.S. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Rencana Pembelajaran Semester (RPS). Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu. Universitas Brawijaya.
Widodo, W., Sudibyo, E., & Sari, D. A. P. (2018). Analysis of expert validation on developing integrated science worksheet to improve problem solving skills of natural science prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012026
Wulanzani, U.T., Lestari, U. & Syamsyuri, I. (2016). Hasil Validasi Buku teks Matakuliah Bioteknologi Berbasis Bahan Alam Tanaman Pacing (Costus speciosus smith) sebagai Antifertilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1 (9), 1830-1835.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4088
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Farah Erika, Agung Rahmadani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran
E-ISSN: 2442-7667
Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
Email: [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.