Analyzing Speech Accommodation Model in 1st Debate of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates

Abdul Muhid

Abstract


In Indonesia, candidates, especially presidential candidates, are busy crafting positive narratives to build a positive image. In this study, we will look at language use from the macro level, namely, the situation and function of communication, as well as at the micro level, which is how the verbal interactions of language users communicate their ideas in front of the public. The current article uses qualitative with descriptive and interpretative types. Analysis of the Speech Accommodation Model in the first debate of the 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates reveals several key insights into how candidates strategically adapt their language to connect with different audiences and achieve their communication goals. The analysis highlights the dynamic nature of accommodation, with candidates shifting their linguistic styles based on situational factors, such as the topic of discussion, the perceived attitudes of the audience, and the rhetorical strategies employed by their opponents. This research provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between language, identity, and power in political communication. By examining how candidates navigate linguistic diversity and negotiate their rhetorical stance, we acquire a deeper understanding of the strategies employed to engage, persuade, and mobilize voters in pursuing electoral success. And detail model used by all candidates is summed up as follows; inward convergence, outward convergence, divergence, con in dive accommodation, and over-accommodation.


Keywords


Communication accomodation theory; Presidential candidates; Debate; Speech accommodation;

Full Text:

FULL PDF

References


Aboba, M., & Montgomery-Vestecka, G. (2023). Group boundary salience and nonaccommodation between healthcare workers and community members in Ghana. Language Sciences, 99, 101569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101569

Adams, A., & Miles, J. (2023). Examining textism convergence in mediated interactions. Language Sciences, 99, 101568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101568

Amaghlobeli, G. (2018). Types of Political Discourses and Their Classification. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 3(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v3i1.117

Auer, P., Frans, H., & Kerswill, P. (2005). Dialect Change. Cambridge University Press.

Bakonyi, S. (1958). Divergence and Convergence in Culture and Communication. Journal of Communication, 8(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1958.tb01125.x

Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and Political Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’S Political Speech. Arecls, 7(January 2009), 23–40. http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/volume7/bayram_vol7.pdf

Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., Shields, D. C., & Gunn, J. (2003). Defending Symbolic Convergence Theory from an Imaginary Gunn. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033563032000160990

Byrd, G. A., & Zhang, Y. B. (2023). Communication frequency, identity accommodation, and attitudes toward people with disabilities in the United States: Disability salience and intergroup anxiety. Language Sciences, 99, 101564. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101564

Cohn, M., Keaton, A., Beskow, J., & Zellou, G. (2023). Vocal accommodation to technology: the role of physical form. Language Sciences, 99, 101567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101567

Coolidge, A. A., Montagnolo, C., & Attardo, S. (2023). Comedic convergence: Humor responses to verbal irony in text messages. Language Sciences, 99, 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101566

Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2015). Communication Accommodation Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, September 2020, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic006

Edwards, C., Edwards, A., & Rijhwani, V. (2023). When in doubt, lay it out: Over vs. under-accommodation in human-robot interaction. Language Sciences, 99, 101561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101561

Eggins, S., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Genres and Registers of Discourse. Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 230–256. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n9

Ehala, M., Giles, H., & Harwood, J. (2016). Conceptualizing the Diversity of I ntergroup Settings The Web Model. 301–316.

Elhami, A. (2020a). Communication Accommodation Theory: A Brief Review of the Literature. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 04(05), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i05.002

Elhami, A. (2020b). Communication Accommodation Theory: A Brief Review of the Literature. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 04(05), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i05.002

Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory : A look back and a look ahead Communication. Centre for Social Research in Communication The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Qld, Australia 4072. May 2014.

Gasiorek, J., & Dragojevic, M. (2017). The Effects of Accumulated Underaccommodation on Perceptions of Underaccommodative Communication and Speakers. Human Communication Research, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12105

Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. In Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537

Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991a). Contexts of Accommodation (H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (eds.)). Cambridge University Press.

Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991b). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles Howard, Coupland Justine, Coupland Nikolas., editors. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press; 1991. pp. 1–68.

Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (2010). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Contexts of Accommodation (pp. 1–68). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663673.001

Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. 293–310.

Giles, H., & Smith. (1979). Accommodation Theory: Optimal Levels of Convergence. in Howard Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds), Language and Social Psychology (pp. 45–65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Giles, R. H. (1970). The Role of Trade in International Relations. International Relations, 3(8), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711787000300804

Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). Spoken and written language (F. Christie (ed.); Second, pp. 9–64). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892222.9

Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On Language and Linguistics. MPG Books Ltd, Bodrnin, Cornwal, The Tower Building, 11 York Road, London, SE1 7NX 15 East 26 Street, New York, NY 10010.

Heller, M., & Watts, R. J. (2007). Style and Social Identities. In Style and Social Identities. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198508

Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W. (2022). Linguistic Accommodation in Teenagers’ Social Media Writing: Convergence Patterns in Mixed-gender Conversations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2020.1807853

Hoffman, W. B., & Zhang, Y. B. (2022). Explaining Communication Adjustment : Communication Accommodation Communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication & Interactions Research, 2(1), 75–100.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 4th edition. In Pearson Education Limited (Vol. 4).

Jibril, A., Idris, S., & Mohammed, A. (2022). A Discourse Analysis of Online Readers’ Comments on Political Discourse in Nigeria Abubakar Jibril, Sabiu Idris, and Adamu Mohammed. Journal of Strategic and Global Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jsgs.v5i2.1092

Kampf, Z. (2021). Political speech acts in contrast: The case of calls to condemn in news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.031

Kenzhekanova, K. K. (2015). Linguistic Features of Political Discourse. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p192

Labov, W. (1966). The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistics Review, 3, 4–22.

Labov, W. (2010a). Principle of Linguistic Change. Wiley-Blackwell.

Labov, W. (2010b). Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. In WileyBlackwell (1st ed., Vol. 3). A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Wilei-Blacwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496

Labov, W. (2010c). Principles of Linguistic Change (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Lamont, M., Park, B. Y., & Ayala-Hurtado, E. (2017). Trump’s electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. British Journal of Sociology, 68, S153–S180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12315

Meyerhoff, M. (2023). Responses to CAT at 50: Reflections on accommodation from a sociolinguist. Language Sciences, 99, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101570

Muhid, A. (2019). Akomodasi dalam Konflik Sosial pada Diplomasi Pemberian Pisuke Lintas Desa : Kajian Sosioliguistik. In Humanitatis: Jounal of Language & Literature (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 163–170). Humanitatis.

Muhid, A., Machmoed, H. A., & Hakim Yassi, A. (2020). Convergence as Communication Strategy (Syamsurrijal (ed.); 1st ed.). Yayasan Barcode.

Muhid, A., Machmoed, H. A., & Yassi, A. H. (2020). Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Inter-Dialectical Accommodation among the Sellers-Buyers Discourse. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 3(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v3i2.10264

Muhid, A., Machmoed, H. A., Yassi, A. H., & Nasmilah, N. (2020). Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Inter-Dialectical Accommodation among the Sellers-Buyers Discourse. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 3(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v3i2.10264

Nurliana, N. (2020). Communication Strategies Employed By Higher Educational Students in Oral Presentation of Dayak Ngaju Language. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i2.2276

Orlandi, M. (2021). Communication Accommodation Theory. Medium.

Riandy F, A. (2016). Akomodasi Komunikasi Dalam Interaksi Antarbudaya Pedagang Etnis Bugis Dan Minang Kabau Di Pasar Induk Talang Banjar Jambi. Jom Fisip, 3(1), 3.

Sulistyo, B. A., & Khristianto. (2017). Political Discourse Analysis on Trump’s Ideology. 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/JSSH.V1I1.1035

Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities (Minority Rights Group Report No. 38). London: Minority Rights Group. Reprinted in part in Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press.

Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Crehire, J. (1982). Psychological and Linguistic Parameters of Speech Accommodation Theory. in C. Frser & K. R. Scherer (Eds), Advances in the Social Psychology of Language (pp. 205–255). Cambridge University Press.

Tison, R., & Poirier, P. (2021). Communication as Socially Extended Active Inference: An Ecological Approach to Communicative Behavior. Ecological Psychology, 33(3–4), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2021.1965480

Toma, C. L. (2014). Towards Conceptual Convergence: An Examination of Interpersonal Adaptation. Communication Quarterly, 62(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.890116

Trudgill, P. (1992). Introducing Language and Society. Penguin English. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gA4jAQAAIAAJ

Vidhiasi, D. M. (2020). The Analysis of Political Discourse in Anies Baswedan Interview with The Sydney Morning Herald. Al-Lisan, 5(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v6i2.1340

Wen, Z. (Edward), Han, L., Hu, G., & Teng, M. F. (2022). Rethinking language policy and planning in the Greater Bay Area of China: insights from translanguaging theory. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00167-0

West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2021). Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. In Individualism and Political Disorder (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710583.00007

West, R., & Turner, L. (2021). Introducing Communication Theory. In McGraw-Hill Education.

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Communication Accommodation Theory. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application (4th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.

Whaley, B. B., & Samter, W. (2006). Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars. Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars, 1–545. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614308

Zhang, Y. B., Harwood, J., Piercy, C., Liu, N., & Ruble, R. (2023). Accommodation, social attraction, and intergroup attitudes on social media: the effects of outgroup self-presentation and ingroup accommodation. Language Sciences, 99, 101563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101563




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10917

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Muhid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching (p-issn: 2338-0810 | e-issn: 2621-1378) has been Indexed/Listed by

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.