Email this article 
Studi Pendahuluan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah dan Metakognisi Siswa SMA berbasis UAPAC+SE
Abstract
Metacognition skills such as procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, monitoring, and evaluating are needed to understand problem-solving skills such as controlling and self-evaluation, planning and application, plan analysis, and understanding the problem. This study aims to describe problem-solving skills and student cognition in solving problems in physics subjects of XI IPA students in SMA Negeri 8 Samarinda. The population of the study sample amounted to 116 students grouped based on the results of physics achievement tests as many as 40 questions, divided into three groups, namely: groups of 32 students (28%), middle groups 61 students (53%), and groups under 23 students (20%). The research method used is a descriptive approach to the form of research in the form of case studies. Indicators of problem-solving skills, consisting of understanding the problem, analysis of the problem, planning, application of the plan, controlling & self-evaluation (UAPAC + SE). While metacognition uses the indicator of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI). Based on data analysis, it can be concluded that the average problem-solving skills of upper group students (68%) are the high category, middle group students (34%), and lower group students (33%) are low categories. While the average metacognition skills are upper group students (66%) in the high category, middle group students (36%), and lower group students (33%) in the low category.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, N., Zakaria, E., & Halim, L. (2012). The effect of a thinking strategy approach through visual representation on achievement and conceptual understanding in solving mathematical word problems. Asian Social Science, 8(16), p30.
Anderson, Lorin W., & Krathwohl, David R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s.
Anggo, M. (2010). Pelibatan metakognisi dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. EDUMATICA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1 (01).
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.
Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aydın, U., & Ubuz, B. (2010).Structural model of metacognition and knowledge of geometry. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 436-445.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2015). Indeks pembangunan manusia Indonesia. Sumber; id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_Pembangunan_Manusia. Diakses: 27Maret. (3).
BSNP, (2010).Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI. Jakarta: Badan Standar.
Buzan, T.( 2005). The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps. UK: Harper Collins.
Cheng, C. Y. & Yeh, T. H. (2009). From concepts of motivation to its application in instructional design: Reconsidering motivation fromm in instructional design perspective, British Journal of Educational Technology. 40(4), 597-605.
Chernocova, T.E. (2014). Features Of Metacognition Structure for Pre-School Age Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146, pp.203 – 208.
Cox, R.& Brna, P. (1994).“Supporting the Use of external Representations in Problem Solving: the Need for Flexible Learning Enviroments”. Journal of Artificial intelligence in Education. 6(2), 239-302.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.
dePorter, B., Reardon, M.& Singer-Nourie, S. (2009). Quantum Teaching.Jakarta: Mizan.
Dowd, J. E., Araujo, I., & Mazur, E. (2015). Making sense of confusion: Relating performance, confidence, and self-efficacy to expressions of confusion in an introductory physics class. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(1), 010107.
Hermita, M. andThamrin, W. P (2015). Metacognition Toward Academic Self-Efficacy Among Indonesian Private University Scholarship Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 171, pp. 1075 – 1080.
Hudiono, B. (2007).Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika dan ModelPembelajaran Kreatif Untuk Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Pontianak :Makalah FKIP UNTAN.
Jayapraba, A. P. D. G. (2013). Metacognitive intruction and cooperative learning strategies for promoting insightful learning in science. International Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications (IJONTE), 4(1).
Kemendikbud. (2013). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 69 Tahun 2013 Tentang Kerangka DasarDanStrukturKurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas / Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Larkin, J. H. , & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 191-203.
Matlin, M. W. (1998). Cognition. Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
Mateycik, F., Hrepic, Z., Jonassen, D., & Rebello, N. S. (2007). Studens’percepstions of case-reuse Based problem solving in algebra-based physics. Physics Education Research Conference 951, 144 – 147
Mariati, P. S. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Dan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan.
Moreno, R. (2010).Educational Psychology.New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do-student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014), PISA, OECD Publishing.
Paivio, A. (2006). Dual Coding Theory and education. Universitas of Western Ontario. Online.
Pintrich (1995). Promoting of self-regulated learning. http://dwb.unl.edu/Book/CH09/Chapter09w.html
Phang, F. A. (2009). The Patterns of PhysicsProblem Solving from the Perspective ofMetacognition. Disertasi. University ofCambridge.
Rickey, D. and Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 77(7), 915-920.
Safari, Y., & Meskini, H. (2015). The Effect of Metacognitive Instruction on Problem Solving Skills in Iranian Students of Health Sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(1), 150.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Psychology Press
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(99), 460-475.
Schraw, G., Olafson, L.., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognition Knowladge and Field-based science learning in an outdoor environmental Education Program. InZohar, A. and Dori, Y. J. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research. Springer.
Selçuk, G. S., & Çalýskan, S. (2008). The effects of problem solving instruction on physics achievement, problem solving performance and strategy use. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(3), 1.
Slavin, E. R. (2006). Educational psychology. Theory and practice. USA. Perason.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(77), 51-79.
Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment. Tersedia pada http://www. pdfspiller. Com
Sukaisih, R. & Muhali. (2014). Meningkatkan kesadaran metakognitif dan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan pembelajaran problem solving. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 2(1), 71-82.
Sukmadinata, N. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supardi., Syah, D., & Syah, D. (2007).Pengantar StatistikPendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Syafa’ah, Heny K, & Langlang H. (2015). Pengembangan metakognitive self-assesment untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir evalusi dalam membaca teks sains berbahasa inggris. Unnes Pyhsics Eduacation Journal 4.1.
Taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing. (http://www.kurwongbss.qld.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/blooms.htm).
White, B & Fredericson. (2005). A Theoritical frame Work and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development. Journal Eduacational Psychologist, 40, 211 – 233.
Yasin, R. M., Halim, L., & Ishar, A. (2012). Effects of problem-solving strategies in the teaching and learning of engineering drawing subject. Asian Social Science, 8(16), p65.
Zimmerman, B. J & Schunk, D. H (1989) (Eds). Self Regulation Learning and academis achievement: Theory, research, andpractice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v4i1.984
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Muhammad Nasir, Madlazim Madlazim, I Gusti Made Sanjaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.