Assessment Evaluation Using Solo Taxonomy for Measuring Levels of Critical Thinking Skills: PYP International Baccalaureate Case Study

Hana Triana, Perawati Bte Abustang, Erry Utomo, Gumgum Gumelar Fajar Rakhman, Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate and document learning outcomes using the SOLO taxonomy model as an indicator of learning outcomes. Higher order thinking skills towards critical thinking elements. This research uses case studies with mixed methods qualitative and quantitative research methods with documentation research instruments of data analysis. The research sample was conducted in 2 4th grade elementary schools in Jakarta which implemented the IB (International Baccalaureate) curriculum by using the results of the SOLO taxonomy assessment. Data collection is done by interview method, analysis of the researched data documentation on critical thinking skills using the SOLO Taxonomy framework in the learning process and the level of assessment descriptors as scores or grading student report card assessments. The SOLO taxonomy descriptor level of the highest level of thinking skills is Extended Abstract with an assessment descriptor value of 5 and the lowest descriptor value of 3 (multi-structural) for reporting learning outcomes based on the achievement of student learning outcomes on understanding the concept of knowledge. Stages of students' critical thinking from not knowing to the level of understanding of concepts/learning outcomes related to real life. So it can be concluded that the results of this case study research can be used as an evaluation of the reporting of learning outcomes on critical thinking skills in the learning process and documentation of reporting assessments of learning at the elementary school level. The higher the students' critical thinking skills in understanding the concept of learning outcomes, the students reach the Higher Order Thinking Skills stage or the high-level skills needed in 21st century learning in solving real-life cognitive problems.

Keywords


Descriptor assessment, SOLO taxonomy, reporting of learning outcomes, critical thinking skills, International Baccalaureate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeniji, SM, Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12087

Ali Khan, B., & Abbas, A. (2021). Evaluating the Perceptions of Primary School Teachers' regarding SOLO Taxonomy. Asian Social Studies, 2. www.solotaxonomy.com

Appulembang, od, & tamba, kp (2021). Problem Solving Ability of students with impulsive cognitive style based on solo taxonomy. journal of honai math, 4(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i2.176

Atasoy, E., & KME (2019). Investigation of students' holistic and analytical thinking styles in learning environments assisted with dynamic geometry software. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 44(199), 49-74.

Biggs, JB, & CKF (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning. The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome).

Chubko, N., Morris, JE, McKinnon, DH, Slater, EV, & Lummis, GW (2019). SOLO taxonomy as EFL students' disciplinary literacy evaluation tool in technology-enhanced integrated astronomy course. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0095-6

Damopolii, I., N. et al. (2020). The effectiveness of Inquiry-based learning to train students' thinking skills based on SOLO taxonomy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Desyana, N. (2020). Analysis of Student Learning Responses using a solo taxonomy of temperature and heat material. inquiry: science education journal, 9(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41407

Fajari, LEW, Sarwanto, & Chumdari. (2020). Student critical thinking skills and learning motivation in elementary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012104

Hassan, S. (2023). Analysis Based On Bloom's Taxonomy: Pakistan's Federal English Curriculum And Examination Content For Matric. In Journal of Positive School Psychology (Vol. 2023, Issue 1). http://journalppw.com

Hastari, RC, Anggreini, D., & Wiyanti, K. (2021). The Students' Thinking Level in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on SOLO Taxonomy as Viewed from the Mathematics Anxiety. Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 126–136.

Hattie, JAC, & BGTL (2004). Cognitive processes in AsTTle: The SOLO taxonomy. Ministry of Education (New Zealand).

Hooi Lian, L., Thiam Yew, W., & Idris, N. (n.d.). superitem test: an alternative assessment tool to assess students' algebraic solving ability.

IBOs. (2018). Learning and teaching.

Kamal, S., & Badr, I. (2020). SOLO Taxonomy in a Visible Learning School: A Quasi-Experimental Design to Study the Effect of SOLO Taxonomy on Student Metacognitive Ability SOLO Taxonomy as a Framework of Designing Comprehension Strategies .

Korkmaz, F., & Unsal, S. (2017). Sosyoloji dersi öğretim programı kazanımları and değerlendrme sorularının solo taxonomisine göre analysis. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2017(69), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.69.5

Lian, LH, & IN (2006). Assessing algebraic solving ability of form four students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/171.

Masood, M. (2016). Systematic Review of Revised Bloom Taxonomy, SOLO Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) in Assessing Students' Historical Understanding in Learning History. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309072501

Mcmahon, M., & Garrett, M. (nd). Evaluation of a learning outcomes taxonomy to support autonomous classification of instructional activities.

Mulbar, U., RA, & AA (2017). Analysis of the ability in mathematical problem-solving based on SOLO taxonomy and cognitive style. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/WTETE V15I1Y2017P6873.

Ozdemir, AS, & GYS (2015). The analysis of elementary mathematics pre-service teachers' spatial orientation skills with the SOLO model. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 217-236.

Potter, MK, & Kustra, E. (nd). Course Design for Constructive Alignment (Winter 2012) A Primer on Learning Outcomes and the SOLO Taxonomy.

Putri, U., MM, & SD (2017). How to analyze the students' thinking levels based on SOLO taxonomy? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012031.

Scott, SJ (2000). An Application of the SOLO Taxonomy to Classify the Strategies Used by Grade 5 Students to Solve Selected Music-Reading Tasks (Vol. 27, Issue 2). https://about.jstor.org/terms

Smith, TW, & Colby, SA (n.d.). Source: The Clearing House (Vol. 80, Issue 5).

Sudihartinih, E. (2019). Facilitating mathematical understanding in three-dimensional geometry using the SOLO taxonomy. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 6(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.18551/erudio.6-1.2.

Svensäter, G., & Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787

Watson, JM, & MJB (2001). Development of reasoning associated with pictographs: Representing, interpreting, and predicting. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 47-81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015594414565.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7894

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Hana Triana, Perawati Bte Abustang, Erry Utomo, Gumgum Gumelar Fajar Rakhman, Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats