Analysis of Science Literacy Ability of Junior High School Students with the NOSLiT Method of South Konawe Regency

Syarifuddin Syarifuddin, Hasnawati Hasnawati, Ordiman Lasaima, Muh. Safiuddin Saranani

Abstract


Scientific literacy is seen not only as an important component of science education, but also as an ethical/moral competency. Science education plays an important role in creating responsible citizens, in this case scientific literacy is needed in making social-scientific decisions. Currently the concept of scientific literacy is a learning goal in the educational curriculum in various countries. Scientific literacy emphasizes students to analyze, predict, and apply scientific concepts in everyday life. Likewise with students in South Konawe district for the junior high school level, the majority of whose scientific literacy results are classified as lacking. Therefore, this research focuses on the Analysis of Science Literacy Ability of Junior High School Students Using the Nature of Science Literacy Test (NOSLiT) Method in Konawe Selatan Regency. The research method used in this research is quantitative with a descriptive approach. The sampling technique in this study used a simple random sampling technique. The result is that the scientific literacy skills of SMPN Konawe Selatan students based on the NOSLiT instrument in class IX are still in the low category while those in class VII and class VIII are classified as very low. This can be seen from the acquisition of the overall average NOSLiT score for all grade levels, namely 37%, 39.4% and 45.5% respectively, and after calculating the overall score, the average percentage of scientific literacy ability of Konawe Middle School students is obtained. South is in the low category of 40.8%. The achievement of scientific literacy for the NOSLiT indicator of SMPN Konawe Selatan students at all grade levels obtained the highest percentage of achievement in the scientific naming aspect, followed by the scientific misconception aspect, and the ability to process skills and the lowest percentage of achievement lies in the aspect of science postulates. In general, the highest achievement for all NOSLiT indicators was obtained by class IX, followed by class VIII and class VII. The percentage achievement for class IX for indicators of scientific naming, process skills ability, and major misconceptions reached 50% and was above 50% but still this percentage is still in the low category.

Keywords


Scientific Literacy; NOSLiT; Middle School Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673-699.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. 2008. Representations of Nature of Science in High School Chemistry Textbooks over the Past Four Decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7): 835-855.

Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. 2000. Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4): 295–317.

Anggraini N. & Wasis. (2014). Pengembangan Soal IPA-Fisika Model TIMSS(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 3, hlm 5-18.

Ardianto, D. dan Rubini, B. 2016. Literasi Sains dan Aktivitas Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Tipe Shared. Unnes Scecience Education Journal, 5 (1), 1153-1159.

Ariyanti, A. I. P., Ramli, M., & Prayitno , B. A. (2016). Preliminary Study on Developing Science Literacy Test For High School Student in Indonesia. Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education, 1(1), 284-289, dilihat pada 3 maret 2021

Astuti, Y. K. (2016). “Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA”, STKIP NU Indramayu, Jawa Barat.

Bell, R.L. 2007. Teaching the Nature of Science through Process Skills: Activities for Grades 3–8. New York: Allyn & Bacon/Longman.

Brickman, P. et al. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 3(2): 1-22.

Bukhori, Akhmad. 2005. Menciptakan Generasi Literat. http://pribadi.or.id/diary/2005/ 06/ 22/ menciptakan-generasi-literat/. Diaksespadatanggal27September 2018.

Bundu, P. (2006). Penilaian Keterampilan Proses dan Sikap Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Sains-SD. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Chiapetta, E L., & Koballa, T. R (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Fundamental Knowledge and Skills. New York: Allyn & Bacon

Clough, M.P. and Olson, J.K. 2012. Impact of a Nature of Science and Science Education Course on Teachers’ Nature of Science Classroom Practices. Dalam Myint Swe Khine(Ed.), Advance in Nature of Science ResearcConcept and Methodologies. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London NewYork.

Crawford, B. 2012. Moving The Essence of Inquiry Into The Classroom: Engaging Teachers and Students in Authentic Research. Dalam K.C.D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research: Moving Forward (hlm. 25–42). Dordrecht: Springer.

Dahar, R., Ws. (1989). Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga Press.

DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. London Sage Publications.

Docktor, J. L. 2009. Development and Validation of a Physics Problem-Solving Assessment Rubric. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Minnesota.

Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, A., & Scott, P. 1996. Young people images of science. Pennsylvania:Open University Press.

Edi, S. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana. Faisal, S. 1992. Format-Format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s Science Literacy in the Aspect of,Content Science. JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81-87.

Fraenkel, J., R, & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

Gormally et all. 2009. Effect of Inquiry Based Learning on Students’Science Literacy Skill and Confidence.

Gormally, C., Peggy B., & Mary L., 2012. Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11 (2012),364-377.

Haladayna, T. M. 1994. Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Item. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.

Hayat, B. dan Yusuf S. 2010. Benchmark Internasional Mutu Pendidikan. PT.Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Holbrook, J, & Rannikmae, M. 2009. The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental &Science Education, 4(3): 275-288

Huryah, F. Sumarmin, R dan Effendi, J. 2017. Analisis Capaian Literasi Sains Biologi Siswa SMP Kelas X di Kota Padang. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan. 1 (2): 72-79.

Istiqomah, NisaS. 2016. Literasi Sains Siswa kelas 9 SMP Kota Bandung pada Konteks Sumber daya Alam. Universitas pendidikanIndonesia,Bandung. Istyadji, M. 2007. Penerapan Panduan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle dengan kooperatif group investigation untuk meningkatkan kualitas proses dan hasil belajar siswa SMP pada materi pokok larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit. Universitas Negeri Malang. Malang.Kemendikbud.2016.http://www.acdp-indonesia.org/en/improved-student- literacy/.[dilihat pada 5 maret 2021].

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Budaya. 2017.Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran SekolahMenengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMP/MA). Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kurnia, dkk. 2014. Analisis Bahan Ajar Fisika SMP Kelas XI Di Kecamatan Indralaya Utara Berdasarkan Kategori Literasi Sains. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika. http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jipf/article/ download/1263/419.

Lederman, N.G. 1992. Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4): 331-359.

Lederman, N.G. 1999. The State of Science Education: Subject Matter Without Context. Electronic Journal of Science Education. (Online), Volume 3Nomor 2, (http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7602/5369 diakses 28Januari 2017).

Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Schwartz, R.S. 2002. Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

Lederman, N.G. 2003. Letters: Inquiring about Inquiry. Science and Children, 40 (8): 9.

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S., & Antink, A. 2013. Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1 (3): 138-147.

Liang, L.L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O.N., Adams, A.D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. 2009. Preservice Teachers’ Views about Nature of Scientific Knowledge Development: an International Collaborative Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7:987-1012

Litbang Kemdikbud. 2015. Programme for International Student Asasesment(PISA) A. Diakses padatanggal 9 Desember2018

Mariah, Y. S. 2014. Analisis Literasi Sains Pada Buku Tematik Untuk SD/MI KelasIV Kurikulum 2013. Tangerang. Universitas Terbuka.

Marta, F. dkk. (2013). Analisis literasi Sains Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu pada Tema Efek Rumah Kaca. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Murti, P., dkk. 2018. The Analysis of High School Student Science Literacy Based on Nature of Science Literacy Test (NOSLiT). Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 1097(1) .

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practces, Crosscutng Concepts, and Core Ideas, Commitee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Educaton Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Educaton, Washington, DC.

National Science Teachers Association. 2000. NSTA Position Statement: The Nature of Science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Understanding the Scientific Enterprise:The Nature of Science in the Next Generation Science Standards.

Noviana, M dan Jullianto, T. 2017. Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto Ditinjau dari Aspek Konten, Proses dan Konteks Sains. Universitas Muhamadiyah Purwokerto. Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2017 OECD. (2003), Programme For International Student Assement And Non Oecdcourtles, OECD Publishing.

PISA. 2004. Learning for tomorrow’s. USA: OECD-PISA.

Poedjiadi, Anna. (2010). Sains dan Masyarakat. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Purwanto. 2009. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang. (2011). Survei Internasional PISA. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Rahayu, S. 2014. Menuju Masyarakat Berliterasi Sains: Harapan dan Tantangan Kurikulum 2013. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajarannya 2014. Universitas Negeri Malang

Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbook Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19-24, diakses 4 maret 2021 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391

Rusilowati,A., Lina, K. Sunyoto, E, Arif, W. 2016. Developing an Instrument of Scientific Literacy Assessment On the Cycle Themes. International Journal of Environment and Science Education, 11(12): 5720, dilihat 4 maret 2021,http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115684.pdf

Santrock, J. W. 2013. Educational Psychology, Second Edition, Terjemahan Tri

Wibowo. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sekaran, U. 2003. Research Methods for Business. New York:John Wiley & Sons.

Setiawati, D.M. 2013. Analisis Literasi Sains Guru Biologi SMP dan Penerapannya dalam Proses Mengembangkan LKS Inkuiri. UPI.

Shulman, dkk, et al. (2006). IPAsurvey of brief cognitive screening instruments. Int Psychogeriatr 2006;18:281-294.

Sugiyono, (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Suroso. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sutrisna, Nana.(2021). ‘Analisis Kemampuan Literasi sains Peserta Didik SMP di Kota Sungai Penuh’.

Toharudin, U., dkk. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Wenning, C. J. (2006). Assessing Nature of Science Literacy as One Component of Scientific Literacy. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ, 3-14

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A Framework for Teaching the Nature of Science. Journal Physics Teacher Education,3-10

Wenning J Carl. 2007. “Assessing Inquiry Skills as a Component of Scientific Literacy”. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 4(2), 91-100.

Winarti, W. (2016). Literasi Sains Siswa SMP Di Kota Bandung Pada Tema Alam Semesta”. Bandung.

Wirzal, M. D. H., Nordin, N. A. H. M., Bustam, M. A., & Joselevich, M. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scientific Literacy between 2018 and 2022: Science Education Subject. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1070

Wulan, A.R. (2008). Pengertian dan Esensi Konsep Evaluasi,Assesment,Tes, dan Pengukurannya.

Wulandari, N. dan Solihin, H. 2016. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Aspek Pengetahuan dan Kompetensi Sains Siswa SMP pada Materi Kalor. Research Artikel Cener For Science Education EDUSAINS, vol. 8 no.1 3 2016, hlm. 66-73, dilihat 3 Maret 2021,

Yulianti, Y. 2017. Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. UniversitasMajalengka. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas Vol. 3 No.2.

Zainab, Mustika, W., Sarah, M. 2017. Pengembangan Instrumen Kognitif Literasi Sains pada Pokok Bahasan Tekanan Di Kelas VII SMP Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika. Vol. 1. No. 3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i1.7013

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Syarifuddin Syarifuddin, Hasnawati Hasnawati, Ordiman Lasaima, Muh. Safiuddin Saranani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats