Characteristics of Instruments and Profile of Creative Thinking Ability of Students on Work and Energy Material

Annofi Sa'diyah Muflikhun, Woro Setyarsih

Abstract


Physics learning in secondary schools requires students to achieve learning objectives in developing conceptual skills and creative thinking by studying every problem that occurs in life using the concept of physics. However, the fact is that the physics material taught rarely relates the content of the lesson to everyday life, the lesson is mostly filled with convergent so that creative thinking skills cannot be measured. This study aims to apply the developed instrument and obtain empirical data on the validity of the instrument as well as a profile picture of students' creative thinking abilities. This study uses the ADDIE model with 5 stages, namely analysis, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. The test subjects in this study were 34 students of class X UMIPA 2 at MAN 1 Bojonegoro. The results of the development obtained 10 items of instruments that have been validated by 3 lecturers of physicists. Empirical validity was analyzed using Microsoft Excel software. Based on the data from the validity test results that have been analyzed, it shows that the instrument that has been developed is theoretically valid with an average V Aiken value in the material, construction and language domains, respectively 0.91; 0.91; and 0.87. The results of instrument validation are also declared empirically valid by having values: (a) Empirical validation of items with an rxy value range of 0.34 to 0.64; (b) The reliability of the instrument obtained an r11 value of 0.564 with a sufficient category, (c) The difficulty level of the instrument questions was 30% of the questions in the medium category and 70% of the questions in the easy category, (d) The discriminatory power of the instrument had 10% good questions, 40% enough questions, and 50% of the questions are not good. Creative thinking skills in students have a medium to very high category.


Keywords


Creative thinking ability, Instruments, Validation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiken, L. R. 1985. Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability, and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45, 131-142.

Amalia, Andi A., Jusniar, & Taty S. 2021. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik melalui Penerapan Model Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Kelas XI MIA 2 SMAN 1 Tellu Siattinge (Studi pada Materi Pokok Termokimia). ChemEdu, 2(3), 1-10.

Armandita, Puspa, Dkk. 2017. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pembelajaran Fisika di Kelas XI MIA 3 SMA Negeri 11 Kota Pati. JPIP. 10(2), 129-135.

Arnyana, Ida Bagus P. 2019. Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi 4C (Comunication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking dan Creative Thinking) untuk Menyonsong Era Abad 21. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Matematika dan IPA Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi.

Aziz, Rahman. 2014. Psikologi Pendidikan. Malang: UIN Maliki Press.

Bagiyono. 2017. Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Ujian Pelatihan Radiografi Tingkat 1. Widyanuklida, 16(1), 1-12.

Batlolona, John R. Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Latifah. 2019. Creative Thinking Skills Students in Physics on Solid Material Elasticity. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 16(1), 48-61.

Branch, Robert Maribe. 2015. Survey On Instructional Design Models. New York: Associaton for Educational Communications and Technology.

Collins, R. 2014. Skills for The 21st Century: Teaching Higher–Order Thinking. Curriculum Leadership Journal, 12(14), 1-7.

Fajrina, R. A. N. A., Supriyono K. H., & Arif Hidayat. 2018. Peran Model Projrct Based Learning Dalam Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Kelas XI IPA Melalui Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(3), 291-295.

Farida, Ida. 2017. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fuad, N. M., Siti Zubaidah, Susriyati M., & Endang S. 2015. Profil Hasil Belajar, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa serta Strategi Pembelajaran yang Diterapkan Guru SMP di Kediri. Malang: Jurusan Biologi UM, pp. 807-815.

Harni. 2021. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi di SMA Negeri 9 Sinjai. Makasar: Universitas Negeri Makasar.

Irmaya, Ferna Pristia, dan Titin Sunarti. 2020. Validitas Instrumen Penilaian Berbantuan Google Form untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Fisika Pada Bahasan Fluida Dinamis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 9(2).

Ismara, L., Halini, & Dede Suratman. 2017. Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open Ended di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Untan, 6(9).

Kemendagri. 2022. 273 Juta Penduduk Indonesia Terupdate. https://dukcapil.kemendagri.go.id/berita/baca/1032/273-juta-penduduk-indonesia-terupdate-versi-kemendagri. diakses pada tanggal 2 Mei 2022.

Kemdikbud. 2022. Standar Nasional Pendidikan Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/standar-nasional-pendidikan. Dikases pada tanggal 2 Mei 2022.

Kiryak, Z., dan Calik, M. 2017. Improving Grade 7 Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Water Pollution Via Common Knowledge Construction Model. International Journal of Science and Matemathics Eduvation, 1(1),1-22.

Kowsalya, D. N. 2012. Development and Validation of a Scale to Asses Self Concept in Mild Intellectualy Disabled Children. International journalsoc. Sci & Education.

Lestari, Annisa Dwi., dkk. 2021. Pengembangan Modul Fisika Berbasis Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (SETS) untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA Pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 4(2), 147-154.

Marwiyah, S., Kamid, dan Risnita. 2015. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Terpadu Materi Atom, Ion, dan Molekul SMP Islam Al Falah. Edu-Sains, 4(1).

Munandar, Utami. 2012. Mengembangkan Bakat dan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia

Nasution, P. R. 2017. Perbedaan Peningkatan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Pembelajaran Konvensional di SMPN 4 Padangsidimpuan Puspa. Peidagogeo, 2(1), 46-62.

Nurhakiki, Euis, dan Tri Isti Hartini. 2020. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Topik Bahasan Momentum Implus. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika FITK UNSIQ, 2(1), 174-178.

Putra, Sitiatava Rizema. 2013. Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.

Sintya, Wage Klaudhi, Andik P., dan Indra S. 2018. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa di SMAN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal kumparan fisika.

Seyihoglu, A. & Kartal, A. 2010. The Views of Teaching about Mind Mapping Technique in Elementary Life Science and Social Science Lesson Based Constructivist Method. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 10(3), 1637-1656.

Son, A. L. 2019. Instrumen Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis: Analisis Reliabilitas, Validitas, Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Beda Butir Soal. Gema Wiraloda, 10(1), 41-52.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supriadi, D. 1994. Kreativitas, Kebudayaan dan Perkembangan IPTEK. Bandung: Alfabeta

Susanto, Hery, Achi Rinaldi, & Novalia. 2015. Analisis Validitas Reabilitas Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Al-Jabar, 6(2), 203-217.

Vendiktama, P. R., Mimien H. I, &Endang S. 2016. Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMAN 1 Krian Tahun 2016. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, Vol 1.

Wheeler, S., Bromfield, C. & Waite, S. J. 2002. Promoting Creative Thinking through The Use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 367-378.

Wulandarai, Astri. 2021. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Kelas Xi Sma Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Konsep Elastisitas Dan Hukum Hooke. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Yulius, Yosandi. 2021. Manajemen Kreatif dan Inovatif. Jakarta: UPI Y.A.I

Zubaidah, Siti. 2018. Mengenal 4C: Learning and Innovation Skills untuk Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding 2nd Science Education National Conference. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5408

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Annofi Sa'diyah Muflikhun, Woro Setyarsih

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats