THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICAL LEARNING BASED ON PROBLEM SOLVING REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS’S MOTIVATION AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT

Lalu Saparwadi

Abstract


This study aims to describe whether there are differences in learning mathematics-based problem-solving in terms of results and student motivation of mathematics. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research and the design carried out on this study is a pretest-postest nonequivalent group design. In this research, the observation was done twice, before and after treatment. Observations made earlier are called pre-test and later observations are called post-test. The result of the calculation of the implementation of mathematics learning with the problem-solving based approach to student achievement is significant (p = 0,000 <0.05). It showed a Fcount of 1.002 <Ftabel of 1.76 with a significance level of 5%. Thus H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected, meaning there is a significant difference in mathematics learning achievement between problem-solving approach and conventional. The result of the calculation of the implementation of mathematics learning with the problem-solving-based approach to student's learning motivation is significant (p-count = 0.03 <0.05) or refer to Fcount of 1.07 <Ftable of 1.76 with a significance level of 5%. So that Ho accepted, it means there are differences in student learning motivation that is taught between using problem-solving based learning and conventional learning. Learning with problem-solving approaches will be effective if the teacher as an educator prepares the problems according to the context. From the results of this study, the researchers recommend being used as a reference for similar research with different subject materials. This research can be developed by adding other attribute variables such as student self-confidence, verbal ability, motivation, nor critical thinking ability.


Keywords


mathematics learning, problem-solving

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hamzah B Uno. (2007). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya: analisis di bidang pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Herman Hudojo. (1988) Mengajar belajar matematika, Debdikbud, Jakarta

Joyce, B & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching (5^thed). Massachusetts. A simon dan schuster company

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching. United States of America, Needham Heights, Mass.

Ngalim Purwanto, (2004). Psikologi pendidikan.Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Oemar Hamalik (1990). Metode belajar dan kesulitan-kesulitan belajar. Bandung. Trasindo

Saifuddin Azwar. (2008). Penyusunan Skala Psykologi. Yogyakarata. Pustaka Pelajar.

Saifuddin Azwar. (2008). Sikap manusia: teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarata. Pustaka Pelajar

Suryanto. 2007. ”Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI)”. Majalah PMRI Vol. V No. 1 Januari 2007, halaman 8 – 10.

Triyana, Jaka. 2004. ”Peran alat peraga dalam PMRI”. Buletin PMRI Edisi V Oktober 2004, halaman 3.

Van Den Heuvel-Panhuisen, Marja. 1996. Assessment and Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: CD-Press

Wina Senjaya, (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran berorientasi proses standar proses pendidikan, Jakarta : Kencana Prima

Winkel. W.S. (1996). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia

Surya Dharma, (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran dan Pemilihannya. Jakarta. Dirjen PMPTK




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v1i2.1007

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2013 Lalu Saparwadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats