THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICAL LEARNING BASED ON PROBLEM SOLVING REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS’S MOTIVATION AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT
Abstract
This study aims to describe whether there are differences in learning mathematics-based problem-solving in terms of results and student motivation of mathematics. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research and the design carried out on this study is a pretest-postest nonequivalent group design. In this research, the observation was done twice, before and after treatment. Observations made earlier are called pre-test and later observations are called post-test. The result of the calculation of the implementation of mathematics learning with the problem-solving based approach to student achievement is significant (p = 0,000 <0.05). It showed a Fcount of 1.002 <Ftabel of 1.76 with a significance level of 5%. Thus H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected, meaning there is a significant difference in mathematics learning achievement between problem-solving approach and conventional. The result of the calculation of the implementation of mathematics learning with the problem-solving-based approach to student's learning motivation is significant (p-count = 0.03 <0.05) or refer to Fcount of 1.07 <Ftable of 1.76 with a significance level of 5%. So that Ho accepted, it means there are differences in student learning motivation that is taught between using problem-solving based learning and conventional learning. Learning with problem-solving approaches will be effective if the teacher as an educator prepares the problems according to the context. From the results of this study, the researchers recommend being used as a reference for similar research with different subject materials. This research can be developed by adding other attribute variables such as student self-confidence, verbal ability, motivation, nor critical thinking ability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hamzah B Uno. (2007). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya: analisis di bidang pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Herman Hudojo. (1988) Mengajar belajar matematika, Debdikbud, Jakarta
Joyce, B & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching (5^thed). Massachusetts. A simon dan schuster company
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching. United States of America, Needham Heights, Mass.
Ngalim Purwanto, (2004). Psikologi pendidikan.Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Oemar Hamalik (1990). Metode belajar dan kesulitan-kesulitan belajar. Bandung. Trasindo
Saifuddin Azwar. (2008). Penyusunan Skala Psykologi. Yogyakarata. Pustaka Pelajar.
Saifuddin Azwar. (2008). Sikap manusia: teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarata. Pustaka Pelajar
Suryanto. 2007. ”Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI)”. Majalah PMRI Vol. V No. 1 Januari 2007, halaman 8 – 10.
Triyana, Jaka. 2004. ”Peran alat peraga dalam PMRI”. Buletin PMRI Edisi V Oktober 2004, halaman 3.
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuisen, Marja. 1996. Assessment and Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: CD-Press
Wina Senjaya, (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran berorientasi proses standar proses pendidikan, Jakarta : Kencana Prima
Winkel. W.S. (1996). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia
Surya Dharma, (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran dan Pemilihannya. Jakarta. Dirjen PMPTK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v1i2.1007
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2013 Lalu Saparwadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.