STEM-PjBL Worksheet : Ways to Improve Students' Collaboration, Creativity, and Computational Thinking

Shifa Alkautsar, Moh. Mirza Nuryady, Husamah Husamah, Poncojari Wahyono, Fuad Jaya Miharja

Abstract


This study aims to develop STEM-PjBL worksheets to improve students' collaboration, creativity, and computational thinking skills. This development research uses the ADDIE model by implementing all stages of development. The research instruments were student collaboration observation sheets, student creativity observation sheets, computational thinking assessment sheets, pretest and posttest questions, teacher interview sheets, and validation sheets. Data analysis techniques using qualitative and quantitative descriptive analysis. The product validation results show that the STEM-PjBL-based worksheet is categorized as very feasible based on the validation value obtained by the expert validator. Collaboration, creativity, and computational thinking skills scored respectively 83, 81, and 82 with very good level of achievement category. Non-parametric test results show a significance value (<0.05). These results indicate that the STEM-PjBL worksheet is very feasible and recommended for use in learning.

Keywords


Computational Thinking; Collaboration; Creativity; STEM-PjBL; Worksheet.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to STEM to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493

Aji, M. Q. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Kecakapan Abad 21 Mahasiswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri. Teknodika, 17(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.20961/teknodika.v17i2.35281

Ajizatunnisa, A., Wahyuni, S., Waluyo, L., & Miharja, F. J. (2018). Booklet development based on research identification of fiddler crab (Uca spp.) diversity in mangrove ecosystem. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5337

Aksela, M., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Practise: Active Teachers’ Views of Its’ Advantages And Challenges. Integrated Education for the Real World : 5th International STEM in Education Conference Post-Conference Proceedings, Queensland University of Technology, 9–16. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/project-based-learning-pbl-in-practise-active-teachers-views-of-i

Ardiansyah, R., Diella, D., & Suhendi, H. Y. (2020). Pelatihan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dengan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM Bagi Guru IPA. Publikasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v10i1.12172

Artawan, I. K. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu di SMP Negeri 8 Denpasar Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN SAINS INDONESIA, 5(April), 89–98.

Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613

Avery, Z. K., & Reeve, E. M. (2013). Developing effective STEM professional development programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4

Barcelos, T. S., Munoz, R., Villarroel, R., Merino, E., & Silveira, I. F. (2018). Mathematics learning through computational thinking activities: A systematic literature review. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(7), 815–845. https://www.academia.edu/download/96594322/jucs_24_07_0815_0845_barcelos.pdf

Bellanca, J., Brandt, R., Barell, J., Darling-Hammond, L., Dede, C., Dufour, R., Dufour, R., Fisher, D., Fogarty, R., Frey, N., Gardner, H., Hargreaves, A., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Kay, K., Lemke, C., McTighe, J., November, A., Pearlman, B., … Seif, E. (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 1–27). Solution Tree Press. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/Research/Readings/21stCenturySkills_Re-ThinkingHowStudentsLearn.pdf

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. In Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Carlina, E., & Djukri. (2018). Science project-based learning integrated with local potential to promote student’s environmental literacy skills. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.4.1.1-7

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Desouza, J. M. S. (2017). Conceptual play and science inquiry: using the 5E instructional model. Pedagogies, 12(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1373651

Devianto, L. A., Lusiana, N., & Ramdani, F. (2019). Analisis kerentanan pencemaran air tanah di Kota Batu menggunakan analisis multikriteria spasial dengan indeks DRASTIC. Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan, 7(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.7.2.90-104

Du, J., Wang, C., Zhou, M., Xu, J., Fan, X., & Lei, S. (2018). Group trust, communication media, and interactivity: toward an integrated model of online collaborative learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1320565

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

Farida, I., Hadiansah, Mahmud, & Munandar, A. (2017). Project-based teaching and learning design for internalization of environmental literacy with islamic values. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9452

Fields, D., Lui, D., Kafai, Y., Jayathirtha, G., Shaw, M., Fields, D., Lui, D., Kafai, Y., Jayathirtha, G., Walker, J., & Walker, J. (2021). Communicating about computational thinking : understanding affordances of portfolios for assessing high school students ’ computational thinking and participation practices Communicating about computational thinking : understanding affordances of portfoli. Computer Science Education, 00(00), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1866933

Fiteriani, I., Diani, R., Hamidah, A., & Anwar, C. (2021). Project-based learning through STEM approach: Is it effective to improve students’ creative problem-solving ability and metacognitive skills in physics learning? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012058

Fitriani, W., Suwarjo, S., & Wangid, M. N. (2021). Berpikir kritis dan komputasi: Analisis kebutuhan media pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. JPSI, 9(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i2.19040

Gadanidis, G., Cendros, R., Floyd, L., & Namukasa, I. (2017). Computational thinking in mathematics teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(4), 458–477. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173103/

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Güven, I., & Gulbahar, Y. (2020). Integrating Computational Thinking into Social Studies. The Social Studies, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1749017

Handayani, F. (2020). Membangun keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa melalui literasi digital berbasis STEM pada masa pandemik covid 19. Cendekiawan, 2(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.35438/cendekiawan.v2i2.184

Hershkovitz, A., Sitman, R., Israel-fishelson, R., Eguíluz, A., Garaizar, P., & Guenaga, M. (2019). Creativity in the acquisition of computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1610451

Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2012). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy: Executive summary (No. 1033934).

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E., Brauneis, A., Diaz, M., Saltarelli, A., Blikstein, P., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2018). Design guidelines and empirical case study for scaling authentic inquiry-based science learning via open online courses and interactive biology cloud labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 478–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0150-3

Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: a cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640

Hulukati, W., & Djibran, M. R. (2018). Analisis Tugas Perkembangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Bikotetik (Bimbingan Dan Konseling Teori Dan Praktik), 2(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.26740/bikotetik.v2n1.p73-80

Ika Noviyanti, N., Rosyadah Mukti, W., Dahlia Yuliskurniawati, I., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034

Illeris, K. (2009). Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370902756986

Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi kurikulum merdeka belajar dengan model pembelajaran abad 21 dalam perkembangan era society 5.0. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589

Irdalisa, I., Amirullah, G., Hanum, E., Elvianasti, M., & Maesaroh, M. (2023). Developing STEAM-based students’ worksheet with the ecoprint technique in biology subject. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.6775

Irwan, I., Maridi, M., & Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Developing guided inquiry-based ecosystem module to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7287

Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2020). From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 Cs education. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381887

Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2014). The collaborative push: Moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9234-5

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044508

Kiplagat, P., Role, E., & Makewa, L. N. (2012). Teacher commitment and mathematics performance in primary schools: A meeting point! International Society for Development and Sustainability, 1(2), 286–304. https://isdsnet.com/ijds-v1n2-18.pdf

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review (Issue June). https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC 2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A

Lussetyowati, T. (2011). Analisa penyediaan ruang terbuka hijau perkotaan, studi kasus Kota Martapura. Prosiding Seminar Nasional AVoER Ke-3, 195–207. http://eprints.unsri.ac.id/128/1/Pages_from_PROSIDING_AVOER_2011-23.pdf

Maas, T., Jochim, A., & Gross, B. (2018). Mind the gap: Will all students benefit from 21st Century learning? Center on Reinventing Public Education, October, 1–17. https://lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Freports%2Fmind-gap-will-all-students-benefit-21st-century%2Fdocview%2F2461139420%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D10246%0Ahttps://concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org/atoztitles/link??sid=Pro

Malyn-Smith, J., Lee, I. A., Martin, F., Grover, S., Evans, M. A., & Pillai, S. (2018). Developing a framework for computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education, 182–186. https://d-miller.github.io/DRK12/topic1/7440.pdf

Mamahit, J. A., Aloysius, D. C., & Suwono, H. (2020). Efektivitas Model Project-Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM (PjBL-STEM) terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1284. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14034

Maryani, I., Martaningsih, S. T., & Bhakti, C. P. (2017). Module based on pedagogical content knowledge to increase the engagement and skills of the future teachers in designing a lesson plan. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i1.5758

Miharja, F. J., Hindun, I., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Critical thinking, metacognitive skills, and cognitive learning outcomes: A correlation study in genetic studies. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.135-143

Muslimah, M. muslimah. (2017). Dampak pencemaran tanah dan langkah pencegahan. Jurnal Penelitian Agrisamudra, 2(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33059/jpas.v2i1.224

Neubert, J. C., Mainert, J., Kretzschmar, A., & Greiff, S. (2015). The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.14

Ngoh, N. N. (2013). STEM Pedagogy: Teaching STEM through project-based learning. The National Academies Press, April. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/52956252.pdf

Nuvitalia, D., Saptaningrum, E., Ristanto, S., & Putri, M. R. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional ( Computational Thinking ) Siswa SMP Negeri Se-Kota Semarang Tahun 2022. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 13(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v13i2.12794

Pangestu, R., Riani, E., & Effendi, H. (2017). Estimasi beban pencemaran point source dan limbah domestik di Sungai Kalibaru Timur Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 7(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.7.3.219-226

Poortman, C. L., Illeris, K., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2011). Apprenticeship: From learning theory to practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2011.560392

Ramadhan, N. I. (2018). Pengaturan tindak pidana pencemaran lingkungan di Indonesia: Studi pencemaran tanah di brebes. Logika : Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 09, 96–102. https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jagris/article/view/224.

Reeve, E. K. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.29139/aijss.20160404

Ridha, M. R., Zuhdi, M., & Ayub, S. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran PjBL berbasis STEM dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(1), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i1.447

Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876

Salahuddin, Fandeli, C., & Sugiharto, E. (2012). Kajian pencemaran lingkungan di tambak udang delta mahakam. Jurnal Tekno Sains, 2(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.22146/teknosains.5986

Sari, D. E., Hindun, I., Mahmudati, N., Miharja, F. J., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Are male and female students different in high-order thinking skills? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.17575

Sari, S. P., Manzilatusifa, U., & Handoko, S. (2019). Penerapan Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(2), 119–131.

Sari, S. Y., Sundari, P. D., Jhora, F. U., & Hidayati, H. (2020). Studi Hasil Bimbingan Teknis Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Keterampilan Abad-21 dalam Rangka Penerapan Program Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 4(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol4-iss2/527

Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219

Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st Century? https://unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242996

Shukri, A. A. M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Daud, N. (2020). Integrated STEM-based module: Relationship between students’ creative thinking and science achievement. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.12236

Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017

Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728

Sturyf, A., Loof, H. de, Pauw, J. B., & Petegem, P. van. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983

Su’udiah, F., Degeng, I. N. S., & Kuswandi, D. (2016). Pengembangan buku teks tematik berbasis kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1744–1748. https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i9.6743

Sung, W., & Black, J. B. (2020). Factors to consider when designing effective learning: Infusing computational thinking in mathematics to support thinking-doing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1784066

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329

Tan, A. L., Teo, T. W., Choy, B. H., & Ong, Y. S. (2019). The S ‑ T ‑ E ‑ M Quartet. Innovation and Education, 1(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0005-x

Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Learning using problems to power. Cengage Learning. http://dspace.vnbrims.org:13000/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4228/1/Problem-based Learning Innovation Using problems to power learning in the 21st century.pdf

Teo, T. W., Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., & Choy, B. H. (2021). Centricities of STEM curriculum frameworks: Variations of the S-T-E-M Quartet. STEM Education, 1(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2021011

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Viro, E., Lehtonen, D., Joutsenlahti, J., & Tahvanainen, V. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on project-based learning in mathematics and science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9544

Wang, H. H., Lin, H. shyang, Chen, Y. C., Pan, Y. T., & Hong, Z. R. (2021). Modelling relationships among students’ inquiry-related learning activities, enjoyment of learning, and their intended choice of a future STEM career. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1860266

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Wiartis, W. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Belajar Siswa Melalui Kegiatan Kolaborasi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Di Smp Negeri 6 Batam. Daiwi Widya, 7(5), 17. https://doi.org/10.37637/dw.v7i5.673

Yu, K. C., Fan, S. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Problem-Solving Skills Through Context-Based Learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1377–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4

Yunarti, N. (2021). Analisa Kesulitan Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Pada Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Rambang. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(4), 1745–1749. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1570

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Zulkarnaen, Z., Supardi, Z. . I., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Feasibility of creative exploration, creative elaboration, creative modeling, practice scientific creativity, discussion, reflection (C3PDR) teaching model to improve students’ scientific creativity of junior high school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.1020




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7587

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Shifa Alkautsar, Poncojari Wahyono, Poncojari Wahyono, Fuad Jaya Miharja, Fuad Jaya Miharja

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.