Integrity of Discourse in the Radar Sulawesi Barat Daily Newspaper : The Use of Cohesion and Coherence in Learning Indonesian to Improve Students' Literacy and Knowledge Skills

Idris Idris, Al Fandi, Moh Tahir, Gusti Ketut Alit Suputra, Syamsuddin Krida

Abstract


This study aims to analyze cohesion and coherence in forming the wholeness of the discourse contained in the Radar Sulawesi Barat daily. This research was qualitative. The data was collected using listening and note-taking techniques with several stages: reading, marking, and classifying. The data obtained in this study were written as elements that made up the wholeness of the discourse. The method and technique of data analysis used was the intralingual equivalent method with the comparison technique of equating the main points. Based on the study's results, cohesion and coherence shape the wholeness of discourse in the Radar Sulawesi Barat daily. Discourse cohesion found in this study was a marker of grammatical and lexical cohesion. Grammatical cohesion markers include (1) references, (2) substitutions, and (3) conjunctions. Lexical cohesion markers are repetition; the repetition obtained consists of (1) complete repetition, (2) repetition with changes in form, (3) repetition with changes, (4) repetition with synonym changes, and (5) repetition with hyponyms. In addition to repetition, a marker of lexical cohesion was also found, namely collocation. Furthermore, the element that forms the wholeness of discourse was coherence. This study had a meaning or semantic relationship between elements or sentences in the discourse, which can be used as a strategy for learning Indonesian.


Keywords


Discourse; Cohesion; Coherence; Newspaper; Learning Strategies; Learning Indonesian.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asih, K. M. (2020). Kohesi dan koherensi dalam wacana surat kabar Jawa Pos Rubrik Zetizen. BAPALA, 7(1), 1–6.

Bonvillain, N. (2020). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages (N. Roberts & M. Manzano, Eds.; 8th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Review of Communication, 18(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881

Breeze, R. (2022). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 21(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre

Coulthard, M. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis (C. N. Condlin, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835884

Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Hanafiah, W. (2014). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi pada wacana Buletin Jumat. Epigram, 11(2), 135–152.

Hapsari, W. S. P., & Setiawan, T. (2019). An analysis of word meaning in persuasive discourse on Merry Riana’s quotes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Language, Literature and Education (ICILLE 2018), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.94

Hasnah, Darwis, M., & Asriani. (2018). Pewujudan kohesi dan koherensi pada jurnal refleksi guru bahasa Indonesia SMP di Kabupaten Maros. 221 | JURNAL ILMU BUDAYA, 6(2), 1–9.

Humaira, H. W. (2018). Analisis wacana kritis (AWK) model Teun A. Van Dijk Pada pemberitaan surat kabar Republika. Jurnal Literasi, 2(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v2i1.951

Kemendikbud Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37, Tahun 2018, tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture. AILA Review, 27, 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.02kra

Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (2017). Morphology and lexical semantics. In The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 248–271). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166348.ch12

Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030

Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and Texture. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 61–81). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch3

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (H. Salmon, K. Perry, K. Koscielak, & L. Barrett, Eds.; 3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., & Sheese, R. (2012). Cognitive development: Neo-piagetian perspectives. Taylor & Francis Group.

Mukhlis, M., al Masjid, A., Widyanimgrum, H. K., Komariah, K., & Sumarlam. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. van Dijk pada surat kabar online dengan tajuk kilas balik pembelajaran jarak jauh akibat pandemi Covid-19. GERAM (Gerakan Aktif Menulis), 8(2), 73–85.

Nisa, K. (2019). Hubungan penguasaan piranti kohesi dan koherensi dengan keterampilan menulis eksposisi. Jurnal Dialog, 8(2), 917–926.

Pitoyo, A. (2021). Ragam kohesi leksikal pada rubrik pembaca menulis koran Jawa Pos. Efektor, 8(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v8i1.15868

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102

Ramadlan, M. F. S., & Afala, L. O. M. (2022). Politik media, media politik: Pers, rezim, dan kemunduran demokrasi. UB Press.

Sari, P. A., Ermanto, E., & Agustina, A. (2018). Lexical cohesion grammatical markers in scientific papers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclle-18.2018.60

Setiawati, E., & Rusmawati, R. (2019). Analisis wacana: Konsep, teori, dan aplikasi. UB Press.

Setiawati, S., & Pratiwi, H. A. (2015). Aspek kohesi konjungsi dalam wacana opini pada majalah Tempo dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Gramatika, 1(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2015.v1i1.1162

Sitoro, F. L., Prabawa, A. H., Nasucha, Y., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2020). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi wacana berita rubrik nasional pada majalah online Tempo. Diglosia: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebahasaan, Dan Kesusastraan Indonesia, 4(2), 362–370.

Steensen, S. (2011). Online journalism and the promises of new technology. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.501151

Tardan, P. P., Erwin, A., Eng, K. I., & Muliady, W. (2013). Automatic text summarization based on semantic analysis approach for documents in Indonesian language. 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676209

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2

Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465

Widiatmoko, W. (2015). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi wacana berita rubrik nasional di majalah online Detik. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 1–12. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jsi

Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7128

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.