PISA Assessment on Reading Literacy Competency : Evidence from Students in Urban, Mountainous and Island Areas

Johar Amir, Ambo Dalle, Sulastriningsih Dj, Irmawati Irmawati

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the reading literacy competence of students in class VIII junior high school in Pangkajene and Islands Regency to find, understand, and evaluate information from reading texts. The research used the descriptive quantitative method. The population in this study were all class VIII students spread throughout Pangkajene and Islands Regency were divided into urban, mountainous and island areas totaling 114 schools where the sample selection used purposive sampling and cluster sampling techniques. The technique for collecting data is the test technique. The research instrument was PISA’s questions in 2021. The test PISA’s results showed that 26.7- 60% of students in Class VIII from the three schools in Pangkajene and Islands Regencies had very low competence in finding information, with a score of <54. Then in understanding the reading text, they could only obtain an average score of 33.03. As for the ability to evaluate text, 96.6% of students were in the low category, and only 3.4% were in the high category. This research indicated that students at the junior high school level needed the PISA assessment system to improve the quality of educational competence in Indonesia towards international education standards in the 21st century, especially in reading literacy. The PISA assessment focuses on improving the quality of teaching by teachers and learning in individual students. So that regular PISA assessments can help all students to achieve high competence if the government, school principals and teachers work together to implement and evaluate the PISA assessment on the reading literacy method.

Keywords


Reading Literacy; Competency; PISA Assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cosgrove, J., & Cartwright, F. (2014). Changes in achievement on PISA: the case of Ireland and implications for international assessment practice. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-2-2

Emilia, E., Sujatna, E. T. S., & Kurniasih, N. (2022). Training teachers to teach PISA-like reading: A case in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46534

Harju-Luukkainen, H., Vettenranta, J., Ouakrim-Soivio, N., & Bernelius, V. (2016). Differences between students’ PISA reading literacy scores and grading for mother tongue and literature at school: A geostatistical analysis of the Finnish PISA 2009 data. Education Inquiry, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29413

Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726

Kemdikbud, (2022). https://dapo.kemdikbud.go.id/sp/2/190200

Ibrahim, I., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Tekhnik Pemeriksaan Jawaban, Pemberian Skor, Konversi Nilai dan Standar Penilaian. Jurnal Al-Qiyam, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33648/alqiyam.v2i1.114

Koyuncu, İ., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189

Markus, S. (2019). The Programme for International Student.

Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on The Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. 297(Icille 2018), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Vol. 1 excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks. Pisa 2018, May 2016, 1–170. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/PISA-2018-draft-frameworks.pdf

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Organization for Economic Co-operation; Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754- en

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-enParrila, R. K., dan H. Stack Cutler.(2011). Literacy and Reading Behavior. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 1: 203–11.

OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 results: Vol. 2 where all students can succeed. c. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en.

Oktavia, R., & Hardinata, A. (2020). Tingkat Literasi Digital Siswa Ditinjau dari Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi sebagai Mobile Learning dalam Pembelajaran Biologi pada Siswa Mengengah Atas (SMA) Kecamatan Kuala Nagan Raya. Bionatural, VII(2), 26–34.

Pearson. (2016). AZELLA Technical Report 2016.

Penilaian Pendidikan Badan Penelitian, P., Pendidikan, D., Pendidikan, K., & Kebudayaan, D. (n.d.). PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA.

Pratama, M. A., Supahar, Lestari, D. P., Sari, W. K., Putri, T. S. Y., & Adiatmah, V. A. K. (2020). Data literacy assessment instrument for preparing 21 Cs literacy: Preliminary study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012085

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2021). 21st-Century Readers. In Oecd. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/21st-century-readers_a83d84cb-en

Puteh, M., Zin, Z. M., & Ismail, I. (2016). Reading performance of Malaysian students across gender in PISA 2012. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-08

Putera, P. B., Ningrum, S., Widianingsih, I., Rianto, Y., & Suryanto, S. (2022). The Bookkeeping System Policy and Literacy Movement in Indonesia. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i3.182

Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2016). Profile of middle school students on scientific literacy achievements by using scientific literacy assessments (SLA). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941194

Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Developing Assessment Instruments of PISA Model to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Scientific Literacy in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468

Sahyar, Bunawan, W., Rangkuti, M. A., & Yanti, J. (2020). High-Level Comprehension Skill by using Competencies PISA in Indonesia’s Education System. 384(Aisteel), 737–741. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.169

She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics Literacy: PISA for Better School Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1

Tavdgiridze, L. (2016). Literacy Competence Formation of the Modern School. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 107–110. http://proxy.libraries.smu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1115864&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Tiarina, Y., Wahyuni, S., Fitri, D., Sakinah, N., & Afif, A. F. (2022). PISA reading literacy: encountering female and male’ reading literacy ability. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(2), 593. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i2.6263

Vázquez-Cano, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Infante-Moro, A., & López-Meneses, E. (2020). Incidence of a non-sustainability use of technology on students’ reading performance in Pisa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020749

Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.