Designing Cluster Development-based Entrepreneurial School Model in Tourism Sector for Vocational High School

Sukardi Sukardi, Wildan Wildan, Muh. Fahrurrozi

Abstract


This study aimed at obtaining the design of an entrepreneurial school model for vocational high school based on an effective cluster development in tourism sector to strengthen the competitiveness of vocational high school graduates. This study applied research and development procedures and design based research (DBR) models which were integrated with constructivistic design principles. The procedures involve evaluation and determination of regional supremacy as a leading commodity / industry; development of design and product model for entrepreneurial school cluster-based model; and a reflection and experimental process to get the final product model. The collection of data on developing process was taken through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) in schools, governments, industrial world groups, and other stakeholders. In addition, the questionnaire was also used to get the feasibility of the design by involving experts in the areas of tourism, economy, education, and development. The overall data were then analyzed qualitatively. The components of the entrepreneurial school model produced involve audience, content, procedures, and evaluations.  The design produced learning outcomes, an integrated entrepreneurial curriculum, standardized documents and standard operational procedures, entrepreneurship school management modules. The expert analytical test shows that the overall design and product model are very good.


Keywords


Design Model; Entrepreneurial School; Tourism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik/BPS. (2019). Tingkat pengangguran terbuka berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan 2019. (online) (https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/6/1179/1/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-berdasarkan-tingkat-pendidikan.html).

Baron, R.A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 328-340.

Charney, A. & Libecap, G.D. (2000). Impact of entrepreneurship education. Insights: A Kauffman Research Series (Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership). (online) (http://cfed.org/assets/documents/Youth_Eship_Materials/Impact_of_ Entrepreneurshp_Education.pdf), accessed in 12 Februari 2017.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2007a). Panduan umum pengembangan mulok. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Depdiknas.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2007b). Panduan umum pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Depdiknas.

Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1): 64-77.

Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon: An introduction to the special issue. Social Science Information, 52 (4): 515-538.

Fayolle, A. & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32 (7), 569-593.

Fayolle, A. & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32 (7), 569-593.

Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Walter, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers. It is accessed on 12 February 2017.

Jha, A. K. (2012). Epistemological and pedagogical concerns of constructionism: relating to the educational practices. Creative Education, 3 (2): 171-178.

Jones, P., Jones, A., Packham, G. & Miller, C. (2008). Student attitudes towards enterprise education in poland: A positive impact. Education+Training, 50 (7): 597-614.

Keller, J.M. Motivational Design of Instruction. Dalam Charles M. Reigeluth (Ed). (1983). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their Current Status. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lazzeroni, M. & Piccaluga, A. (2003). Towards the entrepreneurial university. Local Economy, 18 (1): 38-38.

Lee, S.M., & Peterson, S.J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35 (4): 401-416.

Murwani, F. D. (2016). Model pendidikan entrepreneurship di perguruan tinggi: upaya menumbuhkan entrepreneur dan intrapreneur dalam wadah Entrepreneurial University. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Bidang Pendidikan Ekonomi pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Malang, 14 April.

Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Relly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31 (4): 161-170.

Plopmp, T. (2010). Educational design research. an introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds). An introduction to educational design research (hlm.9-35). Netherlands: Netzodruk, Enschede.

Reeves, T.C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspectif, In J.V.D. Akker, K.Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds). Educational design research (hlm.52-66). London: Routledge.

Sala-i-Martin, X., Crotti, R., Di Battista, A., Hanouz, M.D. Galvan, C., Geiger, T., & Marti. (2015). Reaching beyond the new normal: Findings from the Global Competitiveness Index 2015-2016. (online) (http://www3.weforum.org/docs/ gcr/2015-2016/GCR_Chapter1.1_2015-16.pdf), diakses 13 Februari 2018.

Stanley, W.B. (1981). Toward a reconstruction of social education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 9 (1): 67-89.

Sukardi & Wardana, L.A. (2016). The study of service quality and competitiveness of secondary education in West Sumbawa, (Online) (http://www.atlantispress.com/php/ pub.php?publication=icse-15), diakses 3 Mei.

Sukardi, Hamidsyukrie, & Wardana, L. A. (2018). Aplikasi model experiential learning berbasis moodle dan prestasi akademik terhadap intensi kewirausahaan (Laporan Penelitian). Mataram: LPPM Universitas Mataram.

Sukardi, Ismail, M., & Suryanti, N.M.N. (2014). Model pendidikan kewirausahaan berbasis keterampilan lokal bagi anak putus sekolah pada masyarakat marginal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33 (3): 402-412.

Sukardi, Wildan, & Fahrurrozi, M. (2019). Vocational education: A missing link for the competitive graduates?. International Educations Studies, 12 (11).

Sukardi. (2016). Design Model prakarya dan kewirausahaan berbasis ekonomi kreatif berdimensi industri keunggulan lokal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35 (1): 11-124.

Wenerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171-180.

White, S.R. (2012). Reconstructionism and interdisciplinary global education: Curricula construction in a teilhardian context. International Education Journal, 31(1):5-23.

Wildan & Sukardi. (2011). Naskah kajian strategi perencanaan pendidikan menengah di NTB. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikmen Kemendiknas.

Willis, J. & Wright, K.E. (2000). A generl set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 Model. Educational Technology,40 (2):5-20.

Wong, P.K. Ho, Y.P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24 (3): 335-350.

Wong, P.K. Ho, Y.P., & Singh, A. (2007). Toward an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35 (6): 941-958.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i3.5652

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 sukardi sukardi, wildan wildan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.