Conversational Implicature and Politeness Principles in Sumbawanese Daily Conversations

Erlin Pebriantika

Abstract


This study investigated convesational implicatures and politeness principles in Sumbawanese daily conversations. This study concerned on examining several forms of violation in each maxim of Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle. It also examined the importance reasons from native speakers of Samawa language, particularly Taliwang dialect in applying implicatures for their daily communications. This research employed descriptive qualitative method. The purposive sampling had been applied to take samples toward this study. Conversational Analysis was used to analyze the data. Data were collected by using the recording of Sumbawanese daily conversations, dialects of Taliwang. Based on the results of the study, it was found that a violation had emerged from each of Cooperative Principle‟s maxims and Politeness Principle‟s maxims in single and double forms. All forms of violations in a single maxim emerged from both of Cooperative Principle‟s maxim and Politeness Principle maxim. Violations in the form of a double maxim of the Cooperative Principle were divided into six types, covering; 1) Quantity and Relevance, 2) Manner and Relevance, 3) Quality and Manner, 4) Quantity and Manner, 5) Quality and Quantity, and 6) Quality and Relevance. While, in double maxim of Politeness Principle, the violations included five forms, namely; 1) Tact and Agreement, 2) Tact and Approbation, 3) Sympathy and Tact, 4) Generosity and Modesty, and 5) Sympathy and Approbation. Furthermore, the general reasons of applying implicatures in native speaker‟s daily conversations were for transferring information to the addressee, changing topic of conversation, maintaining politeness of the utterance, hiding something from the addressee, refusing something, asking for something and getting something out of the addressee. This research was also expected to contribute more to Samawa language‟s learning materials in particular and to the relation between language and society in any language in common.

Keywords


Conversational Implicature; Politeness; Cooperative Principle.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, Gillian and George Yule. 1996. Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Brown, G., Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0-521-31353-4.

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Where Cooperation Meets Politeness: Revisiting Politeness Models in View of the

Jurnal Kependidikan 16 (2): 129-134

Gricean Framework, Brno Studies in English, Vol 35 (1)

Ellis, Donal G. and Donohue, William A. 1986.Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Process.London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

Grainger, K & Mills, S. 2016. Directness and Indirectness across Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter (eds), Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and Sentence 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicature.Mouton Series in Pragmatics, Vol (11).Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2005. Politeness: Is There an East-West Divide. Journal of Foreign Language. Vol (160).UK: Lancaster University.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatic of Politeness. USA: Oxford University Press

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.

Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mey, Jacob L. (Ed.). 2009. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics: 2nd Edition. Oxford: elsevier. 365-378

Saeed, John I. 2003. Semantics: Second edition. USA: Blackwell Publishing

Scollon, R & Scollon, S. Wong. 1995. Intercultural Communication A Discourse Approach: Second Edition. USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research (1) p. 237-262.

Tsuuda, Sanae. 1993. “Indirectness in Discourse: What Does It Do in Conversation?” Intercultural Communication Studies (http://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/05-Sanae-Tsuda.pdf_accessed on 6th December 2015 on 9:54 PM

Yule, George. 2006. The Study of Language: 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v3i1.468

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Erlin Pebriantika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.