Efektivitas Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing di KBRI Finlandia

Mahmud Mahmud, Jaufillaili Jaufillaili

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of Bahasa Indonesia for non native speakers teaching process in the Finland Embassy based on the students perception through survey method. This study means to give the descriptive information about the teaching process held in 2018. The subject of this research is all the participant of the BIPA program. The instrument of the research is Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) by Ramsden (1993) which includes; Teaching Quality, Generic Skills, Students motivation, Academic environment, Assessment, and Curriculum. The data is analyzed by using psicometric Likert scale. The result of the study show; Teaching Quality is categorized effective, Generic skills is categorized less effective, Students motivation is categorized effective, Academic environment is categorized quite effective, Assessment is categorized quite effective, and Curriculum is categorized not effective. Overall, the process of the BIPA teaching activity is categorized quite effective.


Keywords


Effectiveness, Teaching, Course Experience Questionnaire, BIPA.

References


Ainley, J. (2001). The 1999 postgraduate research experience questionnaire,Department of Education, Training andYouth Affairs (DETYA). Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)

Ardiyansyah. (2012). Profil BIPA Badan Pengembangan Dan Pembinaan Bahasa. http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/lamanbahasa/info_bipa

BC College & Institute Student Outcomes Survey (BC CISOS) (2008). Understanding student satisfaction. Vol. 3 No.1. Available at http://outcomes.ceiss.org/Publications/.

Bystrom, H. N. E. (2004). Teaching evaluations at the introductory finance course at

Desliana Maulipaksi : https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/04/program-bahasa-indonesia-bagi-penutur-asing-bipa-akan-miliki-standar-baku.

Gedgrave, I. (1999). Modern teaching of physic. Delhi: Global Media Bhagirath Palace.

IAFOR Journal of Language Learning Volume 3 – Issue 2 – Winter 2017. https://www.academia.edu/37781903/Persepsi_dan_Ekspektasi_Mahasiswa_BIPA_Yuexiu_di_Tiongkok_Terhadap_Indonesia?auto=download

Indria Mulyaningsih. (2017): http://kui.ikmi.ac.id/2017/12/16/kurikulum-pembelajaran-bahasa-indonesia-bagi-penutur-asing-bipa/

Johnston C. et al., (2011). Measuring students experience: relationship between teaching quality isntrumen (TQI) and Course Expereinece Questionaire(CEQ). Department of economic. Melbourne, The university of Melbourne

Kember, D. (2004). Interpreting students workload, and factors which shapes students perception of their workload. Jurnal Studies In Higher Eduction vol 29. No. 2

Kember, D & Leung, D. Y. P. (2009).Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. London: Springer.

Laili Etika Rahmawati dan Dawid Michał Gajewski (2010) Urgensi Penilaian Dalam Pembelajaran Bipa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Uiversitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. PROSIDING SEMNAS KBSP V E-ISSN: 2621-1661 153.

Lund University: A comparison of the Course Experience Questionnaire and a traditional Evaluation Approach. Lund: Lund University.

M Latief. (2013). "BIPA, Tingkatkan Fungsi Bahasa Indonesia Menjadi Bahasa Internasional",https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2013/10/23/1253102/BIPA.Tingkatkan.Fungsi.Bahasa.Indonesia.Menjadi.Bahasa.Internasional.

Mardapi, Djemari. (2004). Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Instrument Dan Penilaian Ranah Afectif. Jakarta. Departemen Pendididkan Nasional.

Maulana-Eh. (2013). http://www.unpad.ac.id/2013/05/melalui-program-bipa-bahasa-indonesia-semakin-banyak-dipelajari-oleh-orang-asing/

Nunan, T., Rigmor, G., & McCausland, H. (2000). Implementing graduate skills as an Australian University, in Fallows, S.,and Steven, C., (eds) Integrating KeySkills in Higher Education, London Krogan Page.

Saputro, E. P., & Arikunto, S. (2018). Keefektifan manajemen program pembelajaran BIPA (Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing) di kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(1), 122-138.

Scheerens, J. (2009). Improving school effectiveness. Fundamental of Educational Planning. No. 68. United Nation Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organosation (UNESCO). Paris.

Sidhu, Gurnam Kaur. (2003). Literature in thelanguage classrooms: Seeing through the eyes of learners. In: Ganakumaran & Edwin Malachi (eds.). Teaching ofliterature in ESL/EFL. contexts. pp. 88-110. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi-Melta ELT Series.

Ur, P. (2009). A course in language teaching: practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wahyu Joko Saputra, dalam (Arief Kurniatama dan Listya Buana Putra (2018), Revisi Bipa Untuk Mahasiswa Asing Observasi dan Sit in BIPA di IAIN Surakarta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i1.2286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 mahmud

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.