English in Mathematics : Trends, Benefits, and Challenges in Southeast Asia Countries

Moh. Thoyib Syafi'i, Angga Hidayat, Ani Kusumaningsih, Yuliana Friska, Nurmalia Nurmalia

Abstract


This study aims to identify the application of English in mathematics teaching in Southeast Asia countries, focusing on trends across countries, methods, benefits, and challenges. This study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) method adapted from the PRISMA model, resulting in 17 relevant articles obtained from 141 articles in the Scopus and Web of Science databases.  The data analysis technique of this research applied thematic analysis to review, identify, and analyze the data.  The findings revealed that emerging research focused on learning policies and media, improving pedagogical practices, educational quality, and student learning outcomes. Malaysia is the country that has conducted the most research on this topic, with 11 articles, followed by the Philippines and Thailand, each with 2 articles. The majority of studies used qualitative methods and mixed methods. The benefits of using English in mathematics instruction included avoiding translation errors, supporting the implementation of global learning, enhancing soft skills and problem-solving abilities, supporting future career prospects, and improving the quality of learning with support from teachers and related parties. Some challenges faced include varying skills and readiness of teachers and students, the availability and utilization of resources, and the different impacts on students, especially those from diverse demographics. Additionally, cultural and linguistic gaps between English and students’ mother tongue, the rapid adoption of English policies in mathematics teaching, and necessary pedagogical adjustments also present challenges.


Keywords


English In Mathematics; Non-Native Learner; Systematic Literature Review.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albury, J. N. (2020). Beyond economy and culture: Language-in-education preferences of Malaysian youth. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1680161

Basree, S. (2009). The Implementation of Contemporary Children’s Literature Program (CCL) in Malaysian Primary Schools: Feedback from Stakeholders. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(8), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i08/46485

De Araujo, Z., Roberts, S. A., Willey, C., & Zahner, W. (2018). English Learners in K–12 Mathematics Education: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 879–919. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318798093

Feryok, A. (2009). Activity theory, imitation and their role in teacher development. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809104699

Gowers, T., Barrow-Green, J., Leader, I., & Princeton University (Eds.). (2008). The Princeton companion to mathematics. Princeton University Press.

Hamid, M. O., & Honan, E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom: Implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.678854

Iyer, P., & Moore, R. (2017). Measuring learning quality in Ethiopia, India and Vietnam: From primary to secondary school effectiveness. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(6), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1322492

Jarvis, J., Dickerson, C., Thomas, K., & Graham, S. (2014). The Action – Reflection – Modelling (ARM) Pedagogical Approach for Teacher Education: A Malaysia-UK Project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.2

Jourdain, L., & Sharma, S. (2016). Language Challenges in Mathematics Education: A Literature Review. Waikato Journal of Education, 21(2), 43–56.

Kewara, P. (2017). Phrasebook: Una salida para los maestros de CLIL en Tailandia. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 10(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.3

Khalid, M. S., Sutoyo, E., Mungad, M., Sari, E. N., & Herawan, T. (2014). Teaching and Learning using Computers: How should We Tread on Its’ Changing Technology? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(5), 45. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i5.3943

Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., Maaruf, N., Yamat, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). An Investigation of Teachers’ Pedagogical Skills and Content Knowledge in A Content-Based Instruction Context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v1i2.86

Mahmud, S. N. D., Nasri, N. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Halim, L. (2018). Science teacher education in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0026-3

Mamba, M., Tamayao, A., & Vecaldo, R. (2020). College Readiness of Filipino K to 12 Graduates: Insights from a Criterion-Referenced Test. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.84.625.637

Manakul, T., Somabut, A., & Tuamsuk, K. (2023). Smart teaching abilities of junior high school teachers in Thailand. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2186009. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2186009

Meaney, T. (2013). The privileging of English in mathematics education research, just a necessary evil? Mathematics Education and Society, 65–84.

Othman, J., Mohd Saat, R., Hasan Adli, D. S., & Senom, F. (2020). Dual Language Programme: Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Teaching Science Through English. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 5(1), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp255-269

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pan, D. J., Yang, X., Ku, Y. Y. S., Dulay, K. M., Cheung, S. K., McBride, C., Wong, P. C. M., & Ho, C. S. H. (2022). Variability in Asian parents’ English and mathematics skills: A family-based study. Frontiers in Education, 7, 898201. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.898201

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008, June). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8

Sah, P. K., & Li, G. (2022). Translanguaging or unequal languaging? Unfolding the plurilingual discourse of English medium instruction policy in Nepal’s public schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(6), 2075–2094. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1849011

Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2022). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Web of Knowledge Recalled for Mathematically Rich and Contextually Realistic Problems. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12250

Sharbawi, S., & Jaidin, J. H. (2020). Brunei’s SPN21 English language-in-education policy: A macro-to-micro evaluation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1657267

Sua, T. Y. (2007). Attitudes and Achievement Orientations of Students towards Learning of Science and Mathematics in English. Kajian Malaysia, 25(1), 15–39.

Suliman, A., Mohd Nor, M. Y., & Md Yunus, M. (2017). Dual-Language Programme in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Glancing Through the Students’ Readiness and Unravelling the Unheard Voices. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(4), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1704-09

Suliman, A., Nor, M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Gleaning into Students’ Perspectives in Learning Science and Mathematics Using the English Language. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, SPI 2, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi2.445.456

Wilson, K. (2021). Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.11979

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.