Supporting Proportional Reasoning Through Technology Integration in Mathematics Learning

Ahmad Lutfi, Nurjanah Nurjanah, Bambang Avip Priatna Martadiputra, Al Jupri

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the role of technology in facilitating the development of students' proportional reasoning skills in mathematics learning. This study used the systematic literature review method with a qualitative approach. Documents on the Scopus database were analyzed according to the research objectives using the PRISMA 2020. Thematic analysis was applied to all documents included in the search results. The results of this study indicated that there were 18 documents found that addressed the chosen topic-first in 2006, with 2015 being the most productive year discussing this topic. The technologies used to facilitate the development of proportional reasoning skills are Flash/ActionScript 3 programs-dominated, robotics, web-based learning, interactive touchscreen tablet application (MIT-Ext)-ordered by document quantity, virtual reality (VR), GeoGebra, video games, and augmented reality (AR). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches were used in almost equal parts. Junior high school was the most researched level of this topic, but no research has been conducted at the senior high school level. The most productive country to research this topic was the Netherlands. The results of this study were expected to provide practical benefits for teachers and future research.


Keywords


Proportional Reasoning; Technology; Mathematics Learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agyei, E., Agyei, D. D., & Benning, I. (2023). Teaching mathematics with digital technologies: A situational analysis of high school teachers’ experiences in Ghana. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2023.2265241

Agyei, E., Darko Agyei, D., & Benning, I. (2022). In-service mathematics teachers’ preparedness, knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy beliefs of using technology in lesson delivery. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2135851

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsaeed, M. S. (2019). Evaluating visible learning: Mathematics teachers’ practices in technology-enhanced classrooms. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1686798

Alfieri, L., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Case studies of a robot-based game to shape interests and hone proportional reasoning skills. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0017-9

Aliyu, J., Osman, S., Daud, M. F., & Kumar, J. A. (2021). Mathematics teachers’ pedagogy through technology: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.1.18

Arican, M., & Özçakir, B. (2021). Facilitating the development of preservice teachers’ proportional reasoning in geometric similarity problems using augmented reality activities. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10359-1

Ayuningtyas, G. F. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran proporsional dan pencapaian self-regulated learning siswa sekolah menengah pertama melalui problem-based learning ditinjau dari gaya kognitif [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/40187/

Cheng, P. J., Liao, Y. H., & Yu, P. T. (2021). Micro:bit robotics course: infusing logical reasoning and problem-solving ability in fifth grade students through an online group study system. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 22(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4844

Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12432

Courey, S., LePage, P., Blackorby, J., Siker, J., & Nguyen, T. (2015). The effects of using dynabook to prepare special education teachers to teach proportional reasoning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015010104

Dağhan, G. (2017). Views of students about technology, effects of technology on daily living and their professional preferences. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(4), 187–194. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160606

Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6

Drijvers, P., Thurm, D., Vandervieren, E., Klinger, M., Moons, F., van der Ree, H., Mol, A., Barzel, B., & Doorman, M. (2021). Distance mathematics teaching in Flanders, Germany, and the Netherlands during COVID-19 lockdown. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1–2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10094-5

Duijzer, C. A. C. G., Shayan, S., Bakker, A., Van der Schaaf, M. F., & Abrahamson, D. (2017). Touchscreen tablets: Coordinating action and perception for mathematical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(FEB), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00144

Eyyam, R., & Yaratan, H. S. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 31S-42S.

Faria, R. W. S. de C., & Maltempi, M. V. (2019). Mathematical intradisciplinarity with GeoGebra in school mathematics. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 33(63), 348–367. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v33n63a17

Fredlina, K. Q., Putri, G. A. M., & Astawa, N. L. P. N. (2021). Penggunaan teknologi sebagai media pembelajaran matematika di era new normal. Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jkam.v5i1.13808

Gunawan, R. G., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., Ilwandri, I., & Gunawan, R. G. (2023). The problem-based learning model integrated with the integrated learning model in science learning: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i2.17576

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Higgins, K., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., & Crawford, L. (2019). Effects of technology in mathematics on achievement, motivation, and attitude: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 283–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748416

Husaini, M. (2014). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam pendidikan. Junal Mikrotik, 2(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.59134/jlmt.v5i1.311

Kessler, A., Boston, M., & Stein, M. K. (2020). Exploring how teachers support students’ mathematical learning in computer-directed learning environments. Information and Learning Science, 121(1–2), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2019-0075

Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics teaching at the university level. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0225-1

Lutfi, A., Juandi, D., Avip, B., Martadiputra, P., Pendidikan Matematika, M., Matematika, F. P., Alam, I. P., & Pendidikan Indonesia, U. (2023). Development proportional reasoning in mathematics learning environment: Systematic literature review. Pedagogy, 8(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v8i1.2469

Marasabessy, R. (2021). Study of mathematical reasoning ability for mathematics learning in schools: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 1(August), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.17509/xxxx.xxxx

McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers and Education, 123(April), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & Group, P.-P. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Mujib, A., & Sulistiana, E. (2023). Kemampuan penalaran proporsional menurut Langrall dan Swafford pada siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i1.2577

Nopriana, T., Firmasari, S., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). Profile of hard skills and soft skills of mathematics education students. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i1.6460

Norton, S. (2006). Pedagogies for the engagement of girls in the learning of proportional reasoning through technology practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 69–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217443

Ortiz, A. M. (2015). Examining students’ proportional reasoning strategy levels as evidence of the impact of an integrated LEGO robotics and mathematics learning experience. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 46–69.

Paat, M., Sutopo, H., & Siregar, N. (2019). Developing a mobile multimedia-based learning resource on living of komodo dragons. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374587.3374592

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Barkatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers and Education, 48(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.006

Pietroszek, K., & Tahai, L. (2019). Scalebridge VR: Immersive proportional reasoning game for children with brain-computer interface for difficulty scaling. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on …. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364734

Ramsten, C., Martin, L., Dag, M., & Hammar, L. M. (2020). Information and communication technology use in daily life among young adults with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 24(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629518784351

Rianto, B., Lutfi, A., Naser, A. D. M., & Dasari, D. (2020). The effect of prior knowledge and learning motivation on mathematics learning outcomes of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(November), 1876–1886. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1876-1886

Rittle-Johnson, B., Zippert, E. L., & Boice, K. L. (2019). The roles of patterning and spatial skills in early mathematics development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.006

Ryd, C., Malinowsky, C., Öhman, A., Kottorp, A., & Nygård, L. (2018). Older adults’ experiences of daily life occupations as everyday technology changes. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(10), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618774525

Selçuk, A. A. (2019). A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA. Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.4058

Shayan, S., Abrahamson, D., Bakker, A., Duijzer, C. A. C. G., & Van Der Schaaf, M. (2016). Eye-tracking the emergence of attentional anchors in a mathematics learning tablet activity. In Eye-Tracking Technology Applications in Educational Research (Issue June 2017, pp. 166–194). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1005-5.ch009

Sunzuma, G. (2023). Technology integration in geometry teaching and learning: A systematic review (2010-2022). Lumat, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1938

Suryadi, A., Yuliati, L., & Wisodo, H. (2020). Could STEM-based phenomenon learning improve students’ proportional reasoning. ILHSS-20, 26–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17758/DIRPUB8.DIR0320440

Susanto, A., Setyaningrum, W., Camellia, F., & Asriani, N. W. (2023). Tren pemanfaatan teknologi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Aksioma, 12(3), 3088–3100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7545

Tjoe, H., & Torre, J. de la. (2014). On recognizing proportionality: Does the ability to solve missing value proportional problems presuppose the conception of proportional reasoning? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.002

Vrugte, J. ter, Jong, T. de, Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. van, & Elen, J. (2015). How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education. Computers and Education, 89, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.010

Vrugte, J. ter, Jong, T. de, Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. van, & Elen, J. (2017). Computer game-based mathematics education: Embedded faded worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition. Learning and Instruction, 50, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.007

Wijayanti, D., & Winslow, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078

Wisittanawat, P., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2020). Street mathematics and school mathematics in a video game. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 1, 310–316.

Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. van, Vrugte, J. ter, Jong, T. de, VanderCruysse, S., & Elen, J. (2015). The role of surprising events in a math-game on proportional reasoning. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 2015-Janua, 613–620.

Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. van, Vrugte, J. ter, Vandercruysse, S., Jong, T. de, & Elen, J. (2015). The role of curiosity-triggering events in game-based learning for mathematics. In Describing and Studying Domain-Specific Serious Games (pp. 1–250). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1

Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. van, Vrugte, J. ter, VanderCruysse, S., Jong, T. de, & Elen, J. (2016). The role of surprise in game-based learning for mathematics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9599, V–VI. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1

Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., ter Vrugte, J., vanderCruysse, S., de Jong, T., & Elen, J. (2017). The effect of surprising events in a serious game on learning mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12458

Wynkoop, D. (2022). Ratio and proportional reasoning of double-accelerated middle school math students [Pennsylvania State University]. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/19304dqw5353




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10166

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran

E-ISSN: 2442-7667

Published by LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Email: [email protected] 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.