How Science Teachers Translate Indigenous Knowledge into Classroom Science: A Qualitative Study in Lombok, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v3i2.22482Keywords:
Indigenous knowledge, Science Education, Teacher-mediated translation, Epistemic positioning, Culturally responsive, Science teachingAbstract
This study investigated how science teachers in Lombok, Indonesia, translate Indigenous knowledge from community contexts into classroom science. A qualitative multiple-case design involved 15 science teachers from West, Central, and East Lombok. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews, 26 instructional documents, classroom observations of seven selected teachers, and researcher field memos. Iterative coding, within-case analysis, cross-case comparison, and triangulation were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed six interconnected translation processes: accessing, selecting, interpreting, negotiating, transforming, and representing Indigenous knowledge. Three epistemic positions emerged: contextual bridging, epistemic restraint, and scientific privileging. Pedagogical translation varied from deep to limited or illustrative forms, with one discrepant case. Importantly, epistemic positioning and pedagogical depth were related but distinct dimensions of teacher practice. Classroom enactment generally progressed from familiar local experiences to inquiry or analysis, scientific interpretation, and epistemic comparison. These findings conceptualize Indigenous knowledge integration as a recursive, teacher-mediated translation process and provide an empirical framework for examining culturally responsive and epistemically attentive science teaching.
References
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
Aikenhead, G. S., & Elliott, D. (2010). An emerging decolonizing science education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(4), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.524967
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Pearson Canada.
Andreotti, V., Ahenakew, C., & Cooper, G. (2011). Epistemological pluralism: Ethical and pedagogical challenges in higher education. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 7(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011100700104
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008
Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together Indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269
Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge.
Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2016). Designing for culturally responsive science education through professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136756
Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2017). The knowledge and practices of high school science teachers in pursuit of cultural responsiveness. Science Education, 101(1), 99–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21250
Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790306
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 97–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560051
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Latip, A., Hernani, & Kadarohman, A. (2024). Local and indigenous knowledge (LIK) in science learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(4), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.035
Lee, H., Yen, C.-F., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2012). Indigenous elementary students’ science instruction in Taiwan: Indigenous knowledge and Western science. Research in Science Education, 42, 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9240-7
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268108559884
Mazzocchi, F. (2006). Western science and traditional knowledge: Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO Reports, 7(5), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400693
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
Mkhwebane, L. N. (2024). Life sciences teachers’ integration of indigenous knowledge: A vision for making science classrooms culturally responsive. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2483. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14859
Mlotshwa, N., & Tsakeni, M. (2024). Challenges experienced by teachers when integrating indigenous knowledge systems in natural sciences practical work. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 28(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2414160
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Naidoo, P. D., & Vithal, R. (2014). Teacher approaches to introducing indigenous knowledge in school science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.956407
Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(S1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004646
Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multiscience perspective. Science Education, 79(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790507
Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2024). A systematic review of pedagogical practices for integrating indigenous knowledge systems in science teaching. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 28(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2374133
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007a). Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 1. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 963–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931020
Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007b). Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 2. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1189–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931038
Ogunniyi, M. B., & Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2024). Analysis of teachers’ perspectives towards the use of IKS to improve STEM education for sustainable development. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 28(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2352980
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Rahmawati, Y., Baeti, H. R., Ridwan, A., Suhartono, S., & Rafiuddin, R. (2019). A culturally responsive teaching approach and ethnochemistry integration of Tegal culture for developing chemistry students’ critical thinking skills in acid-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402, 055050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/5/055050
Rahmawati, Y., Mardiah, A., Taylor, E., Taylor, P. C., & Ridwan, A. (2023). Chemistry learning through culturally responsive transformative teaching (CRTT): Educating Indonesian high school students for cultural sustainability. Sustainability, 15(8), 6925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086925
Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., Rahman, A., & Kurniadewi, F. (2019). Chemistry students’ identity empowerment through ethnochemistry in culturally responsive transformative teaching (CRTT). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1156, 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012032
Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, A., Royani, M., Husamah, H., & Fauzi, A. (2020). South Kalimantan local wisdom-based biology learning model. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.639
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
Sealy, M., Lee Bae, C., & Hogan, E. (2026). Integrating students’ and teachers’ funds of knowledge through culturally responsive and relevant science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-026-10287-5
Seehawer, M. (2018). South African science teachers’ strategies for integrating Indigenous and Western knowledges in their classes: Practical lessons in decolonisation. Educational Research for Social Change, 7(Special Issue), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2018/v7i0a7
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Smith, T., Avraamidou, L., & Adams, J. D. (2022). Culturally relevant/responsive and sustaining pedagogies in science education: Theoretical perspectives and curriculum implications. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17, 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10082-4
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering Indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X%28200101%2985%3A1%3C6%3A%3AAID-SCE3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., & Cheng, T. H. (2021). Indonesian curriculum reform in policy and local wisdom: Perspectives from science education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.28438
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T., & Folke, C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: Lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Harjono, A., Wahyudi, W., & Gummah, S. (2022). Inquiry-creative learning integrated with ethnoscience: Efforts to encourage prospective science teachers’ critical thinking in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.13
Wahyudiati, D. (2022). Ethnochemistry: Exploring the potential of Sasak and Java local wisdom as a teaching materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.49890
Wahyudiati, D., & Qurniati, D. (2023). Ethnochemistry: Exploring the potential of Sasak and Javanese local wisdom as a source of chemistry learning to improve the learning outcomes of pre-service teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26790
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017
Whyte, K. P. (2013). On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: A philosophical study. Ecological Processes, 2, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-2-7
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bahtiar Bahtiar, Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Wirawan Fadli, Hisbulloh Als Mustofa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education (IJETE) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education (IJETE), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
