Student Digital Literacy in Secondary Education: Patterns, Differences, and Associated Factors

Authors

  • Hafsemi Rapsanjani Physics Education Department, Musamus University, Merauke, INDONESIA
  • Rubilyn G Barrios Mathematics Department, Monkayo College of Arts, Sciences and Technology, Monkayo, PHILIPPINES
  • Mailah Grace Dosol-Demonteverde Physics Department, Ateneo de Davao University, Davao City, PHILIPPINES
  • Muhammad Yusril Yusup Institute for Research and Community Empowerment, Mataram, INDONESIA
  • Nova Kurnia Science Education Department, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v3i2.22481

Keywords:

Digital literacy, Secondary education, Digital access, Internet connectivity, Southeast Asia

Abstract

Digital literacy is essential for secondary school students, yet competence may vary across dimensions and access conditions. This study examined multidimensional digital literacy patterns, group differences, and factors associated with digital literacy. A quantitative secondary analysis used a de-identified dataset of 350 secondary school students from four educational contexts in Southeast Asia. Digital literacy was assessed using a 35-item questionnaire covering seven dimensions. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, MANOVA, and hierarchical multiple regression were applied. The mean overall digital literacy score was 116.18 (SD = 13.61). Device and Digital Application Operation showed the highest score (M = 19.37, SD = 2.43), whereas Digital Safety and Ethics showed the lowest (M = 15.19, SD = 2.47). Device access showed a significant difference, F(2, 347) = 3.40, p = .034, η² = .019, while Internet access showed a stronger difference, F(2, 347) = 16.05, p < .001, η² = .085. The final regression model explained 11.4% of the variance, with digital-access variables adding 10.4%. Limited Internet access showed the strongest independent association (β = −.301, p < .001). Digital literacy was more strongly associated with access conditions than with demographic or contextual characteristics.

References

Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017

Barrios, R. G., Dosol-Demonteverde, M. G., Kurnia, N., & Sharov, S. (2026). Preliminary validation of a Student Digital Literacy Questionnaire based on the UNESCO Digital Literacy Global Framework and DigComp 2.2. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 5(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.36312/t385e515

Chang, C.-Y., & Kuo, H.-C. (2025). The development and validation of the digital literacy questionnaire and the evaluation of students' digital literacy. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 11549–11581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13216-7

Chen, L. L., Guo, Z., & Liang, Q. (2026). Gender differences in digital literacy: A systematic and meta-analytic review across developmental stages and socio-cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1673694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1673694

Dolan, J. E. (2016). Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among K–12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1103147

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraillon, J. (Ed.). (2025). An international perspective on digital literacy: Results from ICILS 2023. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87722-3

Gnambs, T., & Hawrot, A. (2025). The development of social, gender, and migration-related disparities in digital competencies during adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 173, Article 108800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108800

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students' ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011

Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J., & Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2 (Information Paper No. 51, UIS/2018/ICT/IP/51). UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Stoilova, M. (2023). The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people's lives and wellbeing: A systematic evidence review. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1176–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189

Maon, S. N., Mohd Hassan, N., Mohamad Yunus, N., Abdul Kader Jailani, S. F. S., & Suzila Kassim, E. (2021). Gender differences in digital competence among secondary school students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(4), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20197

Martin, F., Ceviker, E., & Gezer, T. (2026). From digital divide to digital equity: Systematic review of two decades of research on educational digital divide factors, dimensions, and interventions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 58(2), 396–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2425442

Mirazchiyski, P. V. (2025). Contemporary gaps in research on digital divide in education: A literature review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01166-3

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Nkwamah, J., Tarmo, A., & Maro, W. (2026). Digital skills gap in accessing digital technologies for learning among secondary school students. Discover Education, 5, Article 577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01511-z

Ongardwanich, N. (2022). Development of digital competence of high school students in the era of Thailand 4.0. Journal of Education and Innovation, 24(4), 177–188.

Prasetiyo, W. H., Sari, B. I., Saputri, R. N., Naidu, N. B. M., Triyanto, T., & Dewantara, J. A. (2025). Assessing digital competence in Indonesian students: Demographic and Internet usage factors through the Rasch model. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 21(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135991

Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Yang, J. (2022). The SES-based difference of adolescents' digital skills and usages: An explanation from family cultural capital. Computers & Education, 177, Article 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104382

Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.001

Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between students' socioeconomic status and ICT literacy: Findings from a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 138, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.011

Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students' ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). Development and validation of students' digital competence scale (SDiCoS). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00330-0

van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Vissenberg, J., d'Haenens, L., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Digital literacy and online resilience as facilitators of young people's well-being? A systematic review. European Psychologist, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000478

Vissenberg, J., De Coninck, D., Mascheroni, G., Joris, W., & d'Haenens, L. (2023). Digital skills and digital knowledge as buffers against online mis/disinformation? Findings from a survey study among young people in Europe. Social Media + Society, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231207859

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Wui, M. G. L., Claudio, J. S. R., Zhang, J., Reyes, C. R. R., Reyes, R. T. M., & Leviste, E. N. P. (2025). Role of classroom openness in digital literacy and online civic engagement among Filipino high school students. Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 8(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43151-025-00169-y

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11

How to Cite

Rapsanjani, H., Barrios, R. G., Dosol-Demonteverde, M. G., Yusup, M. Y., & Kurnia, N. (2026). Student Digital Literacy in Secondary Education: Patterns, Differences, and Associated Factors. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 3(2), 216–249. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v3i2.22481

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Hafsemi Rapsanjani, Rubilyn G Barrios, Mailah Grace Dosol-Demonteverde, Muhammad Yusril Yusup, Nova Kurnia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education (IJETE) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education (IJETE), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0