Exploring The Use Of Generative AI In Planning, Content, And Evaluation Of Learning Among University Lecturers

Authors

  • Agus Sumantri State University of Malang
  • Henry Praherdhiono State University of Malang
  • Deka Dyah Utami State University of Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i4.22990

Keywords:

higher education, assessment, content development, instructional planning, generative AI

Abstract

This study examines the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) among Indonesian university lecturers across three instructional domains: learning planning, content development, and assessment. It also investigates whether AI adoption levels differ across these domains and whether adoption intensity influences usage patterns. A quantitative within-subjects design was employed, involving 306 university lecturers with prior experience using generative AI in teaching. Data were collected through a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), following appropriate statistical assumption tests. The findings reveal relatively similar levels of AI use across the three instructional domains, with no statistically significant differences between them (p = 0.551). However, significant differences were identified between lecturers with high and low levels of AI adoption (p < 0.001), indicating consistently greater AI use among high-adoption lecturers across all domains. Furthermore, no significant interaction was found between instructional domains and adoption levels (p = 0.560). These findings suggest that the intensity of individual AI adoption plays a more prominent role in determining usage patterns than the specific instructional domain. The study highlights the importance of strengthening lecturers' AI competencies, particularly in prompt design, output verification, and ethical use, alongside institutional support to promote responsible and pedagogically meaningful AI integration in higher education.

References

Algorithm Watch. (2022). Western bias in AI outputs. Algorithm Watch Report.

Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). AI in curriculum design: A case study from the University of Melbourne. HolonIQ.

Deloitte. (2023). Adaptive learning and AI. Deloitte Insights.

Halme, M., et al. (2024). Resource scarcity and innovation in Global South. Journal of Management Studies.

Hrastinski, S., et al. (2023). AI-driven pedagogical innovation in higher education. Computers & Education, 205, 104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104890

Hwang, G.-J., et al. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of AI in education. Computers & Education.

Ithaka S+R. (2023). Generative AI in higher education. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.123456

Johnson, R., et al. (2024). Data privacy in AI-enhanced education: A global survey. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09745-x

Jones, R., & Smith, T. (2023). AI dependency in higher education: A case study of critical thinking decline. Higher Education Research & Development.

Kirschner, P. A., et al. (2022). The cognitive cost of over-reliance on AI. Educational Psychology Review.

Knox, J., et al. (2022). AI ethics in higher education: Implications for equity. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2024). Social implications of AI-driven personalization. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-02410345-1

Lee, K., et al. (2022). Lost in translation: AI and linguistic bias in multilingual education. Computers in Human Behavior.

Lim, W. M., et al. (2023a). Ethical challenges of generative AI. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09482-8

Lim, W. M., et al. (2023b). Generative AI and the future of education: Rethinking plagiarism and assessment. Journal of Academic Ethics.

Lo, L. S. (2023a). CLEAR framework: Enhancing AI literacy for educators. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.

Lo, L. S. (2023b). The CLEAR path: A framework for teaching AI literacy. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.

Luckin, R., et al. (2022). AI for school teachers. CRC Press.

MIT Office of Digital Learning. (2022). AI-driven curriculum design: A case study at MIT. MIT Press.

MIT Open Learning. (2024). AI pedagogy lab: Training faculty for the future. MIT Press.

Mohamed, S., et al. (2020). Decolonial AI. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

Nugroho, A., & Suryadi, D. (2024). Digital literacy challenges in Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 18(2), 112–130.

Nugroho, A., et al. (2023). Localizing AI for Indonesian education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5).

Nurkholis, A. (2023). Cultural bias in AI: Challenges for Indonesian higher education. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research.

Nurkholis, N. (2023). Decolonizing AI. Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(4).

OECD. (2024). Student voices in AI policy development. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/987654321

Santos, B. S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire. Duke University Press.

Selwyn, N. (2023). AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.

Selwyn, N., et al. (2023). AI and the future of education: Critical perspectives. Wiley.

Selwyn, N., et al. (2024). The risk of dehumanization in AI-enhanced education. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.1234567

Seo, K., et al. (2021). AI-based assistive technology for students with disabilities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4).

Smith, J., et al. (2024). Personalized learning through AI: A case study at the University of Michigan. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.1234

Stanford University. (2023). Innovative AI curriculum design. Journal of Higher Education Innovation.

Strubell, E., et al. (2023). Carbon emissions of AI models. Environmental Science & Technology.

UGM AI Center. (2024). Javanese text analysis using local AI models. Gadjah Mada University Press.

UNESCO. (2023a). AI and education: A guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023b). AI ethics in education. UNESCO Publishing.

University of Cape Town. (2023). AI for contextual research in Africa. African Journal of Technology.

Virginia Tech. (2023). AI adoption in STEM and non-STEM disciplines. Technical Report.

Williamson, B. (2023). Power, culture, and AI adoption. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(3).

____________., et al. (2023a). The ethics of artificial intelligence in education. Routledge.

____________. (2023b). The limits of AI in humanities education. Computers & Education.

World Economic Forum. (2024). The future of academic jobs in the AI era. WEF Report.

Wyatt, S. (2021). Technology determinism revisited. MIT Press.

Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Sumantri, A., Praherdhiono, H., & Utami, D. D. (2026). Exploring The Use Of Generative AI In Planning, Content, And Evaluation Of Learning Among University Lecturers. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 11(4), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i4.22990

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2026): Oktober

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Agus Sumantri, Henry Praherdhiono, Deka Dyah Utami

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright

  1. Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. Licensing for Data Publication

Licensing for Data Publication

JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)