Rethinking Learning Assessment in Lifelong Education: The Relationship Between Educational Technology and the Sustainable Development Goals

Bahasa Indonesia

Authors

  • Syafaruddin FKIP Universitas Lampung
  • Ade Aransyah FKIP Universitas Lampung https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1657-9079
  • Undang Rosidin FKIP Universitas Lampung
  • Rabiyatul Siregar FKIP Universitas Lampung
  • Handoko FKIP Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i3.21513

Keywords:

Continuing Education, Learning Assessment, Educational Technology, artificial intelligence, Technology-Enhanced Assessment

Abstract

The transformation of education in the 21st century calls for an assessment system that not only measures academic achievement but also supports the continuous development of competencies aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study aims to analyse and reconstruct the concept of learning assessment in sustainable education through the integration of educational technology and artificial intelligence. The study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were obtained from Scopus-indexed international articles published between 2020 and 2025. Following a process of identification, screening and selection based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 articles were identified as eligible for in-depth analysis. Data analysis was conducted using a thematic synthesis approach and interpreted through the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model. The findings of the study indicate that lifelong learning requires an assessment system capable of holistically measuring 21st-century competencies, including critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication and problem-solving. Educational technology plays a key role in creating flexible, adaptive and data-driven assessments. Artificial intelligence enhances the evaluation process through personalised learning, real-time data analysis, and the provision of more effective feedback. The research findings have produced a conceptual framework for continuous assessment that integrates Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), educational technology, artificial intelligence, and technology-enhanced assessment to support the achievement of the SDGs. This study makes a theoretical contribution to the development of future assessment models that are more inclusive, adaptive, and oriented towards educational sustainability.

References

Alavi, S. M., Dashtestani, R., & Mellati, M. (2022). Crisis and changes in learning behaviours: Technology-enhanced assessment in language learning contexts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(4), 461-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1985977

Arsyad, M., Suhartini, S., Devianty, T., Imronudin, I., Indah, P. D. P., & Haryono, H. (2026). Pendidikan Berkelanjutan (SDGs). Star Digital Publishing.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Caspari-Sadeghi, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in technology-enhanced assessment: A survey of machine learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(3), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221138791

Chiu, M. M., & Mok, M. M. C. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning and assessment. Educational Psychology, 40(9), 1053-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1810909

Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3), 1-19.

Efendi, I., Prawitasari, M., & Susanto, H. (2021). The implementation of learning assessment in the 2013 curriculum for the subject of history. Prabayaksa: Journal of History Education, 1(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.20527/prb.v1i1.3081

Fitriani, F. (2021). An analysis of information technology-based learning assessment and its implications for improving the quality of education SD/MI. Genderang Asa: Journal of Primary Education, 2(2), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.47766/ga.v2i2.152

Fuller, R., Goddard, V. C., Nadarajah, V. D., Treasure-Jones, T., Yeates, P., Scott, K., ... & Pyorala, E. (2022). Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations. Medical teacher, 44(8), 836-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083489

Glavič, P. (2020). Identifying key issues of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(16), 6500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166500

Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725-9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11053-0

Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Gómez-Ruiz, M. Á., Balderas, A., & Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2025). Improving Learning Through Evaluative Judgement and Feedback Using a Technology-Enhanced Assessment Environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09858-2

Jopp, R. (2020). A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 942-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637

Lestari, L. T., Aliyah, C. D. N., & Sriwulandari, N. (2024). Analysis of Assessment Tools for Evaluating Writing Skills in SMP. Dar el-Ilmi: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 11(1), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.52166/darelilmi.v11i1.6377

Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y., & Lu, O. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y

Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., & Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156100

Morel, G. M., & Spector, J. M. (2022). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.

Mundia, K., & Heru, S. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical competence in conducting assessment of early childhood learning. Obsesi Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 900-912.

Nousheen, A., Zai, S. A. Y., Waseem, M., & Khan, S. A. (2020). Education for sustainable development (ESD): Effects of sustainability education on pre-service teachers’ attitude towards sustainable development (SD). Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119537. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119537

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rahmawati, D. N., Nisa, A. F., Astuti, D., Fajariyani, F., & Suliyanti, S. (2022). The use of the Quizizz app as a means of assessing science learning in the style of. Dawuh Guru: Jurnal Pendidikan MI/SD, 2(1), 55-66.

Satria, M. R. (2024). The transformation of educational assessment standards and the revitalisation of learning assessment in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v17i1.930

Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Available at SSRN 4378735. Sok, Sarin and Heng, Kimkong, ChatGPT for Education and Research: A Review of Benefits and Risks (March 6, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4378735 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735

Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable development, 33(2), 1921-1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221

Thoriq, A., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2023). Education for sustainable development (esd): a systematic literature review on curriculum development strategy design. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(5). Doi: 10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4803

Vilmala, B. K., Karniawati, I., Suhandi, A., Permanasari, A., & Khumalo, M. (2022). A literature review of education for sustainable development (ESD) in science learning: What, why, and how. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 5(1), 35. Doi: 10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.15342

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Syafaruddin, Aransyah, A., Rosidin, U., Siregar, R., & Handoko. (2026). Rethinking Learning Assessment in Lifelong Education: The Relationship Between Educational Technology and the Sustainable Development Goals: Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 11(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i3.21513

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): Juli

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Syafaruddin, Ade Aransyah, Undang Rosidin, Rabiyatul Adawiyah Siregar, Handoko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright

  1. Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. Licensing for Data Publication

Licensing for Data Publication

JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)